RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    중국 초등학교 도덕교과서 (4-6학년) 분석 : 아리스토텔레스의 우애와 정의 개념을 중심으로

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17567843

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Abstract
    This study takes the concepts of philia (friendship) and dikaiosynē
    (justice) in Nicomachean Ethics as its theoretical foundation to conduct a
    systematic analysis of the relational structure of moral education in
    upper elementary grades in China. The basic point of departure of this
    study is that an understanding of moral education that remains at the
    level of whether certain values are presented in curriculum texts or
    textbooks is insufficient to grasp its deeper logic, rather, the more
    critical question lies in the kinds of relational-experiential structures
    within which these values are organized and arranged, and how their
    meanings are gradually generated within students’ lived experiences.
    Based on the preceding examination of curriculum structures,
    orientations of moral education, and textbook content, it can be observed
    that although moral education in upper elementary grades takes the
    formation of relationships as its central task, the way these relationships
    are organized is not arbitrary but grounded in a certain ethical structure
    (Tan, 2017, Zhu, 2014). In other words, the key issue in moral education
    does not lie in whether certain values are present, but in how these
    values are organized within particular structures of relational experience.
    At the theoretical level, this study reinterprets Aristotle’s relevant
    concepts. Philia is not understood as a mere emotional relationship, but
    as a relational virtue grounded in goodwill, trust, and shared life, with
    its core lying in mutual recognition and connection between individuals.
    Dikaiosynē, in turn, is not limited to the observance of rules or laws,
    but is manifested as a normative arrangement concerning distribution,
    responsibility, and order, serving as the fundamental condition for
    maintaining the stability and sustainability of relationships. Although
    these two differ in function, they are inherently interdependent within
    communal life: philia provides the internal bond through which
    relationships are generated, while dikaiosynē provides the normative
    boundaries through which relationships are maintained (Aristotle,
    1984/2009, Yu, 2013, Liao, 2018).
    On this basis, the study further transforms philia and dikaiosynē into
    two core dimensions of an analytical framework—reciprocity and justice
    (fairness)—and uses these as tools to conduct a comprehensive
    examination of moral education in upper elementary grades in China
    across three levels: curriculum structure, goal structure, and textbook
    content.
    The findings indicate that moral education in Chinese primary schools
    exhibits clear structural characteristics overall. First, at the institutional
    level, moral education is incorporated into a unified curriculum system
    through the course “Morality and the Rule of Law,” forming close
    connections with legal education, civic education, and national identity
    education, thereby demonstrating a strong integrative orientation
    (Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, 2022). Second,
    in terms of content organization, the curriculum typically begins with
    students’ everyday life experiences but does not remain confined to them,
    rather, it rapidly expands toward public norms, structures of
    responsibility, and institutional arrangements, transforming relationships
    from interpersonal interactions into institutional relationships (Lu, 2000).
    Third, in textbook presentation, relationships and norms are not treated
    as separate domains but are interwoven within concrete contexts,
    enabling students to gradually understand their intrinsic connections
    through experience.
    This structural feature becomes particularly evident at the upper
    elementary level. Through content such as class self-governance,
    rule-making, public life, legal norms, and rights and obligations, the
    curriculum introduces relationships from simple interactional experiences
    into normative and institutional frameworks. In this process, students are
    not only participants in relational experiences but are also constructed as
    practical agents capable of understanding norms, assuming
    responsibilities, and engaging in public life (Li, Kuang, & Liang, 2020).
    It is noteworthy that within this structure, the dimension of reciprocity
    is not absent, however, it does not appear as an independent principle
    but is embedded within normative and institutional structures, functioning
    as a relational condition for sustaining communal life. This feature also
    corroborates the view in moral education research that relational
    experience must undergo a process of meaning transformation within
    normative structures (Biesta, 2010).
    Overall, this study demonstrates that moral education in upper
    elementary grades in China does not revolve around a single value.
    Instead, it organizes relationships within a specific ethical structure and
    incorporates reciprocity into an overarching framework through normative
    and institutional pathways. In doing so, it enables students to gradually
    develop relational understanding and public consciousness within a
    normative structure, ultimately contributing to the formation of moral
    subjects oriented toward life within a community.
    Keywords: friendship, justice, reciprocity, fairness, Aristotle, moral education,
    Primary School Moral Education
    번역하기

    Abstract This study takes the concepts of philia (friendship) and dikaiosynē (justice) in Nicomachean Ethics as its theoretical foundation to conduct a systematic analysis of the relational structure of moral education in upper elementary gra...

    Abstract
    This study takes the concepts of philia (friendship) and dikaiosynē
    (justice) in Nicomachean Ethics as its theoretical foundation to conduct a
    systematic analysis of the relational structure of moral education in
    upper elementary grades in China. The basic point of departure of this
    study is that an understanding of moral education that remains at the
    level of whether certain values are presented in curriculum texts or
    textbooks is insufficient to grasp its deeper logic, rather, the more
    critical question lies in the kinds of relational-experiential structures
    within which these values are organized and arranged, and how their
    meanings are gradually generated within students’ lived experiences.
    Based on the preceding examination of curriculum structures,
    orientations of moral education, and textbook content, it can be observed
    that although moral education in upper elementary grades takes the
    formation of relationships as its central task, the way these relationships
    are organized is not arbitrary but grounded in a certain ethical structure
    (Tan, 2017, Zhu, 2014). In other words, the key issue in moral education
    does not lie in whether certain values are present, but in how these
    values are organized within particular structures of relational experience.
    At the theoretical level, this study reinterprets Aristotle’s relevant
    concepts. Philia is not understood as a mere emotional relationship, but
    as a relational virtue grounded in goodwill, trust, and shared life, with
    its core lying in mutual recognition and connection between individuals.
    Dikaiosynē, in turn, is not limited to the observance of rules or laws,
    but is manifested as a normative arrangement concerning distribution,
    responsibility, and order, serving as the fundamental condition for
    maintaining the stability and sustainability of relationships. Although
    these two differ in function, they are inherently interdependent within
    communal life: philia provides the internal bond through which
    relationships are generated, while dikaiosynē provides the normative
    boundaries through which relationships are maintained (Aristotle,
    1984/2009, Yu, 2013, Liao, 2018).
    On this basis, the study further transforms philia and dikaiosynē into
    two core dimensions of an analytical framework—reciprocity and justice
    (fairness)—and uses these as tools to conduct a comprehensive
    examination of moral education in upper elementary grades in China
    across three levels: curriculum structure, goal structure, and textbook
    content.
    The findings indicate that moral education in Chinese primary schools
    exhibits clear structural characteristics overall. First, at the institutional
    level, moral education is incorporated into a unified curriculum system
    through the course “Morality and the Rule of Law,” forming close
    connections with legal education, civic education, and national identity
    education, thereby demonstrating a strong integrative orientation
    (Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, 2022). Second,
    in terms of content organization, the curriculum typically begins with
    students’ everyday life experiences but does not remain confined to them,
    rather, it rapidly expands toward public norms, structures of
    responsibility, and institutional arrangements, transforming relationships
    from interpersonal interactions into institutional relationships (Lu, 2000).
    Third, in textbook presentation, relationships and norms are not treated
    as separate domains but are interwoven within concrete contexts,
    enabling students to gradually understand their intrinsic connections
    through experience.
    This structural feature becomes particularly evident at the upper
    elementary level. Through content such as class self-governance,
    rule-making, public life, legal norms, and rights and obligations, the
    curriculum introduces relationships from simple interactional experiences
    into normative and institutional frameworks. In this process, students are
    not only participants in relational experiences but are also constructed as
    practical agents capable of understanding norms, assuming
    responsibilities, and engaging in public life (Li, Kuang, & Liang, 2020).
    It is noteworthy that within this structure, the dimension of reciprocity
    is not absent, however, it does not appear as an independent principle
    but is embedded within normative and institutional structures, functioning
    as a relational condition for sustaining communal life. This feature also
    corroborates the view in moral education research that relational
    experience must undergo a process of meaning transformation within
    normative structures (Biesta, 2010).
    Overall, this study demonstrates that moral education in upper
    elementary grades in China does not revolve around a single value.
    Instead, it organizes relationships within a specific ethical structure and
    incorporates reciprocity into an overarching framework through normative
    and institutional pathways. In doing so, it enables students to gradually
    develop relational understanding and public consciousness within a
    normative structure, ultimately contributing to the formation of moral
    subjects oriented toward life within a community.
    Keywords: friendship, justice, reciprocity, fairness, Aristotle, moral education,
    Primary School Moral Education

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
    • 2. 연구 내용 7
    • 3. 연구 방법 9
    • Ⅱ. 아리스토텔레스의 ‘우애’와 ‘정의’ 개념 13
    • I. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
    • 2. 연구 내용 7
    • 3. 연구 방법 9
    • Ⅱ. 아리스토텔레스의 ‘우애’와 ‘정의’ 개념 13
    • 1. 아리스토텔레스의 ‘우애’ 개념 15
    • 2. 아리스토텔레스의 ‘정의’ 개념 30
    • 3. 우애와 정의의 관계 42
    • Ⅲ. 중국 초등학교 『도덕과 법치』교과서의 성격과 내용 47
    • 1. 『도덕과 법치』교과서의 목표와 구성 체계 48
    • 2. 4-6학년 『도덕과 법치』 교과서의 주요 내용 57
    • 가. 4학년 교과서 57
    • 나. 5학년 교과서 63
    • 다. 6학년 교과서 70
    • Ⅳ. 중국 초등학교 4—6학년 『도덕과 법치』교과서 분석 78
    • 1. 우애의 관점에서 본 관계 형성 방식 79
    • 2. 정의의 관점에서 본 관계 조정 방식 107
    • V. 논의 132
    • 1. 생활관계에서 공공적·제도적 공동생활로의 확장 133
    • 2. 우애의 재구성: 상호적 경험을 중심으로 138
    • 3. 생활 속 규범 이해와 공정성 판단의 과제: 비판적 판단의 형성 · 142
    • 4. 종합: 관계와 규범의 결합이 갖는 교육적 의미 146
    • Ⅵ. 요약 및 결론 151
    • 1. 요약 151
    • 2. 결론 153
    • 3. 연구의 시사점 157
    • 4. 연구의 한계 및 향후 연구 방향 160
    • 참고문헌 163
    • Abstract 175
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼