치매가족조호자를 대상으로 한 Walsh의 한국어판 가족극복력 측정도구의 신뢰도와 타당도 검증 = Reliability and validity of Walsh's Family Resilience Questionnaire-Korean for family caregivers of people with dementia

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to verify the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the family resilience measurement tool （WFRQ-K）, developed based on Walsh's family resilience theory （2015）, for Korean family caregivers of people with dementia. Methods: After the WFRQ （Walsh, 2015） was translated and adapted into Korean, the construct validity, convergent validity, concurrent validity, and reliability of the Korean version of the WFRQ were evaluated with 324 Korean family caregivers of people with dementia. Data analysis was conducted with IBM SPSS 29 for Pearson correlation, exploratory factor analysis （EFA）, and Cronbach’s alpha. Convergent validity was tested using the Korean version of the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale （K-CD-RISC-10）, whereas concurrent validity was tested using the Korean version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale （K-CES-D）. Results: Of the 32 items, five items were eliminated through principal component analysis. The final analysis identified two factors explaining 61.68% of the variance. Internal consistency was supported with a Cronbach’s alpha of .97. Convergent validity showed a strong positive correlation between the WFRQ-K and the K-CD-RISC-10 （r = .79, p 〈 .001）. Concurrent validity showed a strong negative correlation between the WFRQ-K and the K-CES-D （r = -.71, p 〈 .001）. Conclusion: The results of this study show different factor structures when compared to those of the original WFRQ by Walsh （2015）, Measurement equivalence, which means equivalent conceptual construct across groups, should be evaluated when the WFRQ is examined with different cultural groups.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론 1
• A. 연구의 필요성 1
• B. 연구의 목적 6
• C. 용어정의 7
• Ⅱ. 문헌고찰 9
• Ⅲ. 연구방법 40
• A. 연구설계 40
• B. 연구대상 40
• C. 연구도구 41
• D. 연구절차 44
• E. 자료수집방법 49
• F. 자료분석방법 50
• G. 윤리적 고려 51
• Ⅳ. 연구결과 52
• A. 일반적 특성 52
• B. 대상자의 가족극복력 57
• C. 타당도와 신뢰도 검증 66
• Ⅴ. 논의 85
• Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 96
• 참고문헌 97
• 부록 127