도시 리질리언스 관점에서 본 복합문화공간의 계획요소 도출 : 커뮤니티형을 중심으로 = Derivation of Planning Elements of a Complex Cultural Space from the Perspective of Urban Resilience: Focusing on the Community Type

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Derivation of Planning Elements of a Complex Cultural Space from the Perspective of Urban Resilience - Focusing on the Community Type - JiEun Lee Advisor : Prof. Yoon Gab-geun, Ph.D. Department of Design, Graduate School of Chosun University Modern cities are facing various crisis situations such as climate crisis, infectious diseases, regional decline, and social inequality, and the importance of urban resilience is being emphasized so that cities can respond to and recover from external shocks. In this trend, the complex cultural space is attracting attention as a space that strengthens the social and cultural resilience of local communities and cities beyond simple cultural facilities. In particular, the recent complex cultural space is playing various roles, such as community formation, regional revitalization, urban regeneration, and public reinforcement, as well as cultural enjoyment functions, and the spatial possibility from the perspective of urban resilience is expanding. The purpose of this study is to derive the planning elements of a community-type complex cultural space from the perspective of urban resilience. To this end, the components of urban resilience were derived through theoretical consideration of urban resilience and complex cultural space, and redundancy, robustness, resourcefulness, diversity, flexibility, and rapidity. Since then, the spatial characteristics of ACC National Asian Cultural Center, Potato Flower Studio, F1963, Pompidu Center, La Friche la Belle de Mai, and Matadero Madrid, which are examples of community-type complex cultural spaces at home and abroad, have been analyzed from an urban resilience perspective. As a result of the analysis, diversity, resource coexistence, and flexibility were found to be high in common throughout the cases. In particular, the complexation of various functions and programs formed a structure that could maintain space operation and urban vitality through other functions even when specific functions were weakened or changes in the external environment occurred, and the recycling of existing industrial facilities and local resources was found to be a factor that strengthened location and sustainability. In addition, the open space structure and variable program operation were analyzed as characteristics that could flexibly respond to changing social and cultural needs. On the other hand, the speed was relatively low, which was interpreted as because the complex cultural space operated around continuous cultural activities and community recovery rather than short-term recovery. In addition, differences in the way resilience is implemented depending on the space type were shown. In the single building type, resilience is implemented around the aggregation of various functions and the variability of internal space, while village and street types showed characteristics that emphasized local community revitalization and social connection based on the connection between external public spaces and urban organizations. In summary, the community-type complex cultural space was analyzed as an urban resilience-based space that strengthens the city's social and cultural resilience based on the complexation of various functions, recycling of existing resources, flexible space operation, civic participation and formation of local networks. In particular, the complexation of various functions and programs enabled continuous use of space and maintenance of urban vitality in the event of external shocks or social and cultural changes, and the recycling of existing industrial facilities and local resources was found to be a factor that forms the basis for sustainable urban regeneration while maintaining location and regional identity. In addition, the open and flexible space operation method was analyzed as a characteristic of increasing the possibility of adaptation to the changing social needs and urban environment. Therefore, an integrated planning approach that comprehensively considers the components of urban resilience is needed in future domestic complex cultural space planning. Beyond the simple creation of cultural facilities, the role of a public platform for responding to urban crises and strengthening regional resilience should be considered, and for this purpose, it is necessary to comprehensively reflect the acceptance of various functions, recycling of existing resources, connection with local communities, and flexible space management systems. It is also hoped that follow-up studies on planning standards and policy directions linking complex cultural spaces and urban resilience will contribute to the creation of sustainable urban spaces and the recovery of local communities to respond to changes and crises.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제1장 서론 1
• 1.1 연구의 배경 및 목적 2
• 1.2 연구의 범위 및 방법 5
• 1.3 연구 흐름도 6
• 제2장 도시 리질리언스에 대한 이론적 고찰 7
• 2.1 도시화와 도시 취약성 8
• 2.1.1 도시화의 개념 및 특성 8
• 2.1.2 산업화 이후 도시 구조 변화 13
• 2.1.3 도시 취약성에 따른 공간적⋅사회적 특징 14
• 2.2 리질리언스 （Resilience） 16
• 2.2.1 리질리언스의 등장 배경 16
• 2.2.2 리질리언스의 핵심 개념 22
• 2.2.3 리질리언스에 대한 다양한 관점 29
• 2.3 도시 리질리언스 （Urban Resilience） 35
• 2.3.1 도시 리질리언스의 등장과 학술동향 35
• 2.3.2 도시 리질리언스의 논의 38
• 2.3.3 도시 리질리언스의 구성요소 41
• 2.3.4 도시 리질리언스 구성요소와 개념 및 분석기준 48
• 제3장 복합문화공간과 도시 리질리언스의 관계 49
• 3.1 복합문화공간의 개념과 범위 50
• 3.1.1 복합문화공간의 정의 50
• 3.1.2 복합문화공간의 기능과 유형 52
• 3.2 복합문화공간과 도시 리질리언스의 관계 70
• 3.3 선행연구 72
• 3.3.1 선행연구 고찰 72
• 3.3.2 연구의 차별성 78
• 제4장 복합문화공간 사례 분석 80
• 4.1 사례조사 대상 범위 및 분석 방법 81
• 4.2 사례 분석 85
• 4.2.1 ACC 국립아시아문화전당 85
• 4.2.2 감자꽃 스튜디오 88
• 4.2.3 F1963 91
• 4.2.4 조르주 퐁피두 국립미술 ž 문화센터 94
• 4.2.5 Matadero Madrid 97
• 4.2.6 La Friche la Belle de Mai 100
• 4.3 종합 분석 및 소결 103
• 제5장 결론 106
• 5.1 연구 결과 및 시사점 107
• 5.2 향후 연구 방향성 111
• 참고문헌 112
• 부록 116