RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Research on Collaborative Innovation Policy of Industry-University-Research in China-Based on Cooper's Four-Dimensional Analysis Model

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17553672

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The initiative of joint innovation involving industry, university, and research signifies diverse legislative directives released by governmental bodies to foster the creation and evolution of technical breakthrough efforts, incentivizing, backing, and overseeing profound integration and cooperative creative actions among corporations, colleges, and investigative organizations. This study focuses on the collaborative innovation policy of Chinese universities, aiming to reveal the shortcomings in its implementation process and theoretically explain the key factors and characteristics that influence policy execution. This study focuses on China’s higher education industry-university-research collaborative innovation policy, aiming to reveal the shortcomings in its implementation process and theoretically explain the key factors and characteristics that affect policy execution. Based on the four-dimensional policy analysis model proposed by Cooper et al. (2004), the study analyzes the policy from a comprehensive and diversified perspective, thereby identifying the core factors and inherent traits influencing the policy implementation process. The research questions of this study are as follows: First, what major changes have occurred in the value objectives of China’s higher education industry-university-research collaborative innovation policy at different stages? Second, under what political, historical, and institutional contexts was China’s higher education industry-university-research collaborative innovation policy formed? Third, how do the main participants of China’s higher education industry-university-research collaborative innovation policy interact and cooperate? Fourth, what are the key technical means driving collaborative innovation among industry, university, and research in China, and what significant achievements have these policies accomplished? In this regard, the study uses the four-dimensional policy analysis model presented by Cooper et al. (2004) as an analytical framework to analyze innovative policies for collaboration between industry and research from four dimensions: normative, structural, constitutive and technological. The results of this analysis are as follows: First, the paper analyzes the major changes in the value objectives of collaborative innovation policies in different stages from the normative level. From an ideological perspective, this study examines the core beliefs and values reflected in these collaborative innovation policies, focusing on three aspects: the evolution trajectory of values, ideology, and core beliefs in the collaborative innovation policies at each development stage; the differences in core values among different actors in collaborative innovation; and the issues of educational equity arising during the implementation of policies for collaborative innovation among industry, university, and research. Second, the structural dimension focuses on revealing the institutional framework, organizational structure, and power relations that make policy formation possible, that is, explaining under what institutional conditions policies are formed. Unlike the normative dimension, which concerns why policies are made, the structural dimension focuses on the institutional environment and organizational carriers through which policies are implemented. To systematically understand the institutional foundation on which China’s university-industry-research collaborative innovation policies are generated and developed, this section analyzes each stage of policy evolution from three aspects: institutional framework (the basic arrangement of laws and policy systems), organizational structure (the forms of carriers for university-industry-research collaboration), and power relations (the allocation of rights and responsibilities among government, universities, and enterprises). Meanwhile, by combining data such as national university technology transactions, patent sales, and science and technology funding, national research institutions technology transactions, and comparisons of national R&D expenditures with enterprises, the stage-specific characteristics of university-industry-research cooperation policies during different periods are examined. This not only helps clarify the current development status of the policy system, but also provides an important reference for enhancing policy synergy in the future, which is precisely the core value of conducting an analysis of university-industry-research collaborative innovation policies from a structural perspective. Third, based on the four-dimensional policy analysis model proposed by Cooper et al. (2004), this systematically analyzes how different stakeholders interact and cooperate in the joint creative endeavor policies of industry-university-research integration in universities. Taking H University in Yantai, Shandong as a case study, this research uses interviews to explore core issues in the implementation of university-industry-research collaborative innovation policies, such as cooperation mechanisms, interest interactions, and coordination challenges. The aim is to gain an in-depth understanding of role positioning and interrelationships of various stakeholders within the constitutive dimension of the policy. Findings from this section indicate that although universities receive substantial resources and funding support from the government and enterprises, significantly advancing the development of top-tier innovative skills, enterprises also gain high-tech achievements through collaboration, achieving technological upgrades and enhanced competitiveness. However, enterprise participation in university-industry-research collaboration is primarily market-driven, focusing on the rapid transformation and practical application of research results, with the core objective of maximizing profit and efficiency. In contrast, the fundamental functions of universities and research institutions lie in basic research and academic innovation, which often makes it difficult to fully align with enterprises' market-oriented and immediate application needs. Fourthly, regarding the technical perspective, this research concentrates on the technical aspects of cooperative innovation strategies for Chinese institutions, enterprises, and academic labs, seeking to elucidate their primary technical assistance actions and practical outcomes. First, based on the revision of the “Law on the Progress of Science and Technology” in 2007 as a key point, it analyzes the important national-level policies, and how they, through the establishment of critical technical measures, ultimately achieved breakthrough results in collaborative innovation among universities, industries, and research institutes. Second, the study targets eight major national-level collaborative innovation policy documents issued between 2006 and 2024. Using Nvivo15 software and the policy tools perspective, the relevant provisions or statements in the policy texts are coded and categorized. With the aid of content analysis and quantitative analysis, the various policy tools are statistically analyzed. Combined with the policy cycle of collaborative innovation among universities, industries, and research institutes, a two-dimensional analysis framework is constructed. By statistically analyzing the frequency of key policy document tool types, it is possible to identify issues in the Chinese government's promotion of collaborative innovation policy tools in certain dimensions, such as deficiencies, excesses, or gaps. Finally, based on the analysis results from the normative dimension, structural dimension, compositional dimension, and technical dimension, this research offers specific recommendations for the advancement of University-Industry-Research collaborative innovation policies, helping to break cooperative barriers and stimulate innovation vitality.
    번역하기

    The initiative of joint innovation involving industry, university, and research signifies diverse legislative directives released by governmental bodies to foster the creation and evolution of technical breakthrough efforts, incentivizing, backing, an...

    The initiative of joint innovation involving industry, university, and research signifies diverse legislative directives released by governmental bodies to foster the creation and evolution of technical breakthrough efforts, incentivizing, backing, and overseeing profound integration and cooperative creative actions among corporations, colleges, and investigative organizations. This study focuses on the collaborative innovation policy of Chinese universities, aiming to reveal the shortcomings in its implementation process and theoretically explain the key factors and characteristics that influence policy execution. This study focuses on China’s higher education industry-university-research collaborative innovation policy, aiming to reveal the shortcomings in its implementation process and theoretically explain the key factors and characteristics that affect policy execution. Based on the four-dimensional policy analysis model proposed by Cooper et al. (2004), the study analyzes the policy from a comprehensive and diversified perspective, thereby identifying the core factors and inherent traits influencing the policy implementation process. The research questions of this study are as follows: First, what major changes have occurred in the value objectives of China’s higher education industry-university-research collaborative innovation policy at different stages? Second, under what political, historical, and institutional contexts was China’s higher education industry-university-research collaborative innovation policy formed? Third, how do the main participants of China’s higher education industry-university-research collaborative innovation policy interact and cooperate? Fourth, what are the key technical means driving collaborative innovation among industry, university, and research in China, and what significant achievements have these policies accomplished? In this regard, the study uses the four-dimensional policy analysis model presented by Cooper et al. (2004) as an analytical framework to analyze innovative policies for collaboration between industry and research from four dimensions: normative, structural, constitutive and technological. The results of this analysis are as follows: First, the paper analyzes the major changes in the value objectives of collaborative innovation policies in different stages from the normative level. From an ideological perspective, this study examines the core beliefs and values reflected in these collaborative innovation policies, focusing on three aspects: the evolution trajectory of values, ideology, and core beliefs in the collaborative innovation policies at each development stage; the differences in core values among different actors in collaborative innovation; and the issues of educational equity arising during the implementation of policies for collaborative innovation among industry, university, and research. Second, the structural dimension focuses on revealing the institutional framework, organizational structure, and power relations that make policy formation possible, that is, explaining under what institutional conditions policies are formed. Unlike the normative dimension, which concerns why policies are made, the structural dimension focuses on the institutional environment and organizational carriers through which policies are implemented. To systematically understand the institutional foundation on which China’s university-industry-research collaborative innovation policies are generated and developed, this section analyzes each stage of policy evolution from three aspects: institutional framework (the basic arrangement of laws and policy systems), organizational structure (the forms of carriers for university-industry-research collaboration), and power relations (the allocation of rights and responsibilities among government, universities, and enterprises). Meanwhile, by combining data such as national university technology transactions, patent sales, and science and technology funding, national research institutions technology transactions, and comparisons of national R&D expenditures with enterprises, the stage-specific characteristics of university-industry-research cooperation policies during different periods are examined. This not only helps clarify the current development status of the policy system, but also provides an important reference for enhancing policy synergy in the future, which is precisely the core value of conducting an analysis of university-industry-research collaborative innovation policies from a structural perspective. Third, based on the four-dimensional policy analysis model proposed by Cooper et al. (2004), this systematically analyzes how different stakeholders interact and cooperate in the joint creative endeavor policies of industry-university-research integration in universities. Taking H University in Yantai, Shandong as a case study, this research uses interviews to explore core issues in the implementation of university-industry-research collaborative innovation policies, such as cooperation mechanisms, interest interactions, and coordination challenges. The aim is to gain an in-depth understanding of role positioning and interrelationships of various stakeholders within the constitutive dimension of the policy. Findings from this section indicate that although universities receive substantial resources and funding support from the government and enterprises, significantly advancing the development of top-tier innovative skills, enterprises also gain high-tech achievements through collaboration, achieving technological upgrades and enhanced competitiveness. However, enterprise participation in university-industry-research collaboration is primarily market-driven, focusing on the rapid transformation and practical application of research results, with the core objective of maximizing profit and efficiency. In contrast, the fundamental functions of universities and research institutions lie in basic research and academic innovation, which often makes it difficult to fully align with enterprises' market-oriented and immediate application needs. Fourthly, regarding the technical perspective, this research concentrates on the technical aspects of cooperative innovation strategies for Chinese institutions, enterprises, and academic labs, seeking to elucidate their primary technical assistance actions and practical outcomes. First, based on the revision of the “Law on the Progress of Science and Technology” in 2007 as a key point, it analyzes the important national-level policies, and how they, through the establishment of critical technical measures, ultimately achieved breakthrough results in collaborative innovation among universities, industries, and research institutes. Second, the study targets eight major national-level collaborative innovation policy documents issued between 2006 and 2024. Using Nvivo15 software and the policy tools perspective, the relevant provisions or statements in the policy texts are coded and categorized. With the aid of content analysis and quantitative analysis, the various policy tools are statistically analyzed. Combined with the policy cycle of collaborative innovation among universities, industries, and research institutes, a two-dimensional analysis framework is constructed. By statistically analyzing the frequency of key policy document tool types, it is possible to identify issues in the Chinese government's promotion of collaborative innovation policy tools in certain dimensions, such as deficiencies, excesses, or gaps. Finally, based on the analysis results from the normative dimension, structural dimension, compositional dimension, and technical dimension, this research offers specific recommendations for the advancement of University-Industry-Research collaborative innovation policies, helping to break cooperative barriers and stimulate innovation vitality.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • CHAPTER1. Introduction 1
    • 1.1 The necessity and purpose of the research 1
    • 1.2 Research question 4
    • CHAPTER2. Theoretical Foundation and Literature Review 6
    • 2.1 Connotation of Industry-University-Research Collaborative Innovation 6
    • CHAPTER1. Introduction 1
    • 1.1 The necessity and purpose of the research 1
    • 1.2 Research question 4
    • CHAPTER2. Theoretical Foundation and Literature Review 6
    • 2.1 Connotation of Industry-University-Research Collaborative Innovation 6
    • 2.2 Theoretical Basis of Industry-University-Research Collaborative Innovation Policy 9
    • 2.2.1 Industry-University-Research Collaboration policy 9
    • 2.2.2 Industry-University-Research collaborative innovation policy 14
    • 2.3 Preliminary research 16
    • 2.3.1 Current Status of Industry-University-Research Collaborative Innovation Research at Home and Abroad 16
    • 2.3.2 The Current State of Domestic and International Research on Policies for Collaborative Innovation among Industry, University, and Research Institutions 31
    • 2.3.3 Literature Review 36
    • 2.4 Multidimensional Education Policy Analysis Model 40
    • 2.4.1 Cooper's Four-Dimensional Policy Analysis Model 40
    • 2.4.2 Key Theories of Each Dimension in Cooper's Four-Dimensional Analysis Model 46
    • 2.4.3 Prior research on Cooper's four-dimensional policy analysis model 55
    • CHAPTER3. Research Methods 69
    • 3.1 Analysis Framework 69
    • 3.1.1 Analysis Model 69
    • 3.1.2 Analysis Dimensions 73
    • 3.2 Data collection and analysis 75
    • 3.2.1 Text Collection 75
    • 3.2.2 Text analysis 76
    • CHAPTER4. Research Results 80
    • 4.1 Normative Dimension Analysis 80
    • 4.1.1 The Evolution of Value Concepts in China's Industry-University- Research Collaborative Innovation Policies 81
    • 4.1.2 Analysis of the differences in core values among different stakeholders in Industry-university-research collaborative innovation 93
    • 4.1.3 The issue of educational equity: resource concentration and uneven development 98
    • 4.1.4 Conclusion 104
    • 4.2 Structural Dimensional Analysis 107
    • 4.2.1 The initial stage of Industry-university-research cooperation policies (1978-1991) 108
    • 4.2.2 Industry-University-Research cooperation under the guidance of the strategy of revitalizing the country through science and education (1992-1998) 113
    • 4.2.3 Development and improvement of Industry-university-research cooperation policies (1999-2005) 119
    • 4.2.4 Conclusion 126
    • 4.3 Constitutive Dimensional Analysis 128
    • 4.3.1 Analysis of policy issuing entities 129
    • 4.3.2 Key Stakeholder Analysis 134
    • 4.3.3 Interview Analysis 141
    • 4.3.4 Conclusion 146
    • 4.4 Technical Dimensions Analysis 148
    • 4.4.1 Legal and regulatory achievements of Industry-university-research collaborative innovation 149
    • 4.4.2 Quantitative Analysis of Industry-University-Research Collaborative Innovation Policies from the Perspective of Policy Instruments 156
    • 4.4.3 Conclusion 177
    • CHAPTER5. Discussion and Recommendations 181
    • 5.1 Conclusion 181
    • 5.2 Suggestion 185
    • References 193
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼