Recently, the Korean capital market has experienced significant structural transformation driven by institutional reforms, including amendments to the Commercial Act and the introduction of the Corporate Value-up Program. This study examines how activ...
Recently, the Korean capital market has experienced significant structural transformation driven by institutional reforms, including amendments to the Commercial Act and the introduction of the Corporate Value-up Program. This study examines how activism affects corporate governance and firm value under these conditions, and projects the future trajectory of activism in Korea through comparison with Japanese cases.
The governance reform period following Abenomics in Japan is set as a comparative baseline. In this research, activist campaigns are classified into three archetypes: capital policy and shareholder return, business restructuring, and governance improvement.
The findings show that recent institutional pressures strengthen the feasibility of activist demands. Activist interventions are linked to short-term and long-term value improvement. Korean firms are expected to follow a conditional convergence path with Japan’s governance reform trajectory, moving from defensive responses toward selective acceptance.
Additionally, the study examines how Generative AI may reshape activist targeting and corporate defense by functioning as an information-processing infrastructure.