RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    한국어 학습자의 쓰기 수행에 영향을 미치는 어휘 능력 요인 분석 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17551765

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      서울 : 한국외국어대학교 대학원, 2026

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(박사) -- 한국외국어대학교 대학원 , 국어국문학과 , 2026. 8

    • 발행연도

      2026

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • DDC

      895.1 판사항(22)

    • 발행국(도시)

      서울

    • 기타서명

      A Study on Identifying Lexical Competence Factors Influencing Korean Learners' Writing Performance

    • 형태사항

      ix, 234p. : 삽도 ; 26 cm

    • 일반주기명

      한국외국어대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
      지도교수: 홍종명
      참고문헌: p. 211-227

    • UCI식별코드

      I804:11059-200001022212

    • 소장기관
      • 한국외국어대학교 글로벌캠퍼스 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 한국외국어대학교 서울캠퍼스 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to identify the lexical competence factors influencing Korean learners’ writing performance by operationalizing lexical competence into objective and measurable indices applicable to learner texts and examining the validity and explanatory power of each index. To achieve this goal, lexical competence indices were extracted from learners’ written productions, and their relationships with proficiency level and writing performance were analyzed in order to select representative indices. Subsequently, the explanatory power and relative influence of these representative indices on the subdomains of writing performance were examined, thereby identifying the key lexical competence factors influencing the writing performance of intermediate and advanced Korean learners.
    First, this study sought to derive quantitative and qualitative lexical competence factors related to writing performance and to operationalize them into measurable indices applicable to learner texts. Quantitative factors included lexical diversity, lexical density, lexical sophistication, and lexical error rate, while qualitative factors included collocation, lexical repetition cohesion, conjunctive cohesion, and topic-based semantic similarity.
    Second, representative indices that significantly distinguished learners’ proficiency levels and demonstrated meaningful relationships with writing performance were identified. Among the quantitative factors, CTTR, lexical density, the proportion of low-frequency vocabulary, error rate per token, and error rate per sentence were selected as representative indices. Among the qualitative factors, collocation token ratio, local cohesion, conjunctive diversity, and cosine similarity were selected as representative indices.
    Third, the study analyzed the explanatory power and relative influence of the representative indices on the subdomains of writing performance in order to identify the core lexical competence factors influencing writing performance. The results revealed that lexical sophistication, lexical error rate, lexical repetition cohesion, and topic-based semantic similarity were the key factors influencing the writing performance of intermediate learners. In contrast, lexical diversity, lexical density, lexical sophistication, lexical error rate, lexical repetition cohesion, and topic-based semantic similarity were identified as the key factors influencing the writing performance of advanced learners. Furthermore, the findings showed that, at the advanced level, multiple lexical factors interact in complex ways and that even the same lexical factor may influence different subdomains of writing performance in different ways.
    This study is significant in that it identified the lexical competence factors influencing Korean learners’ writing performance by operationalizing the components of lexical competence into measurable indices observable in actual learner texts and empirically examining their relationships with writing performance. In addition, by dividing writing performance into the subdomains of content, organization, and language use and identifying the lexical competence factors affecting each domain, this study provided a more detailed explanation of the relationship between lexical competence and writing performance. In particular, the findings confirmed that the same lexical competence factor may exert different influences depending on the specific subdomain of writing performance.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to identify the lexical competence factors influencing Korean learners’ writing performance by operationalizing lexical competence into objective and measurable indices applicable to learner texts and examining the valid...

    The purpose of this study is to identify the lexical competence factors influencing Korean learners’ writing performance by operationalizing lexical competence into objective and measurable indices applicable to learner texts and examining the validity and explanatory power of each index. To achieve this goal, lexical competence indices were extracted from learners’ written productions, and their relationships with proficiency level and writing performance were analyzed in order to select representative indices. Subsequently, the explanatory power and relative influence of these representative indices on the subdomains of writing performance were examined, thereby identifying the key lexical competence factors influencing the writing performance of intermediate and advanced Korean learners.
    First, this study sought to derive quantitative and qualitative lexical competence factors related to writing performance and to operationalize them into measurable indices applicable to learner texts. Quantitative factors included lexical diversity, lexical density, lexical sophistication, and lexical error rate, while qualitative factors included collocation, lexical repetition cohesion, conjunctive cohesion, and topic-based semantic similarity.
    Second, representative indices that significantly distinguished learners’ proficiency levels and demonstrated meaningful relationships with writing performance were identified. Among the quantitative factors, CTTR, lexical density, the proportion of low-frequency vocabulary, error rate per token, and error rate per sentence were selected as representative indices. Among the qualitative factors, collocation token ratio, local cohesion, conjunctive diversity, and cosine similarity were selected as representative indices.
    Third, the study analyzed the explanatory power and relative influence of the representative indices on the subdomains of writing performance in order to identify the core lexical competence factors influencing writing performance. The results revealed that lexical sophistication, lexical error rate, lexical repetition cohesion, and topic-based semantic similarity were the key factors influencing the writing performance of intermediate learners. In contrast, lexical diversity, lexical density, lexical sophistication, lexical error rate, lexical repetition cohesion, and topic-based semantic similarity were identified as the key factors influencing the writing performance of advanced learners. Furthermore, the findings showed that, at the advanced level, multiple lexical factors interact in complex ways and that even the same lexical factor may influence different subdomains of writing performance in different ways.
    This study is significant in that it identified the lexical competence factors influencing Korean learners’ writing performance by operationalizing the components of lexical competence into measurable indices observable in actual learner texts and empirically examining their relationships with writing performance. In addition, by dividing writing performance into the subdomains of content, organization, and language use and identifying the lexical competence factors affecting each domain, this study provided a more detailed explanation of the relationship between lexical competence and writing performance. In particular, the findings confirmed that the same lexical competence factor may exert different influences depending on the specific subdomain of writing performance.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 서론 1
    • 1.1. 연구의 목적 및 필요성 1
    • 1.2. 선행 연구 검토 4
    • 1.2.1. 어휘 사용의 양적 측면 분석 연구 4
    • 1.2.2. 어휘 사용의 질적 측면 분석 연구 8
    • 1. 서론 1
    • 1.1. 연구의 목적 및 필요성 1
    • 1.2. 선행 연구 검토 4
    • 1.2.1. 어휘 사용의 양적 측면 분석 연구 4
    • 1.2.2. 어휘 사용의 질적 측면 분석 연구 8
    • 1.2.3. 어휘 사용과 쓰기 수행 분석 연구 11
    • 1.3. 연구 문제 및 논의의 구성 16
    • 1.4. 주요 용어의 정의 17
    • 1.4.1. 어휘 능력의 구성 요인 17
    • 1.4.2. 쓰기 수행과 쓰기 수행의 세부 영역 18
    • 2. 이론적 배경 20
    • 2.1. 어휘 능력의 범위 20
    • 2.1.1. 어휘 능력의 개념과 구성 20
    • 2.1.2. 표현 어휘 능력 26
    • 2.2. 담화 구성 요소로서의 어휘 28
    • 2.2.1. 결속성의 개념과 유형 28
    • 2.2.2. 응집성의 개념과 특성 34
    • 2.3. 어휘 능력의 구성 요인 및 측정 지표 37
    • 2.3.1. 어휘 능력의 구성 요인 도출 37
    • 2.3.2. 어휘 능력의 양적 요인 측정 지표 41
    • 2.3.3. 어휘 능력의 질적 요인 측정 지표 54
    • 3. 연구 방법 70
    • 3.1. 연구 대상 70
    • 3.2. 어휘 능력 지표 산출 77
    • 3.2.1. 형태소 분석 77
    • 3.2.2. 어휘 능력 요인별 지표 산출 79
    • 3.3. 쓰기 수행 수준 판별 92
    • 4. 어휘 능력 지표의 타당성 검증 98
    • 4.1. 타당성 검증 기준 98
    • 4.2. 어휘 능력의 지표 검증 103
    • 4.2.1. 어휘 능력의 양적 지표 검증 103
    • 4.2.2. 어휘 능력의 질적 지표 검증 119
    • 4.3. 대표 지표 선정 139
    • 5. 쓰기 수행에 영향을 미치는 어휘 능력 요인 규명 145
    • 5.1. 중급 학습자의 어휘 능력 요인 분석 146
    • 5.1.1. 중급 학습자 대표 지표의 설명력 분석 146
    • 5.1.2. 중급 학습자의 핵심 어휘 능력 요인 도출 165
    • 5.2. 고급 학습자의 어휘 능력 요인 분석 171
    • 5.2.1. 고급 학습자 대표 지표의 설명력 분석 171
    • 5.2.2. 고급 학습자의 핵심 어휘 능력 요인 도출 189
    • 6. 논의 및 제언 198
    • 6.1. 연구 결과에 대한 논의 198
    • 6.2. 교육적 제언 204
    • 7. 결론 208
    • 참고문헌 211
    • ABSTRACT 232
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼