RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    카자흐어권 한국어 학습자를 위한 한국어 감사 표현의 의미·화용 대조 분석

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17550516

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study aims to analyze the use patterns of the Korean speech act of gratitude by Kazakh-speaking Korean learners (KKLL), with a particular focus on the expressions 'sugo' and 'gosaeng,' and to propose pedagogical implications for Korean language education in Kazakhstan. These two expressions function as indirect gratitude markers that acknowledge the addressee's effort or hardship, but their use is governed by strict pragmatic constraints based on the social status of the interlocutors and the contextual weight of imposition. Since Kazakh lacks lexical equivalents that directly correspond to 'sugo' and 'gosaeng,' Kazakh-speaking learners are likely to face considerable pragmatic difficulties in acquiring these expressions.
    To investigate this issue, a Discourse Completion Test (DCT) consisting of 24 situations was administered to 30 Korean native speakers (KNS) and 30 Kazakh-speaking Korean learners (KKLL). The collected responses were analyzed based on a framework comprising 14 gratitude strategies, encompassing both direct and indirect gratitude expressions. The analysis examined strategy use patterns according to situation type, social variables (status, intimacy, degree of imposition), and the specific use of 'sugo' and 'gosaeng.'
    The results revealed both similarities and differences between the two groups. Both groups most frequently employed direct gratitude expressions (KNS 43.4%, KKLL 44.4%); however, KKLL used formulaic greetings (Strategy 2) approximately 2.9 times more often than KNS, while KNS used strategies such as emphasizing the listener's burden, self-deprecation, and humor more frequently. Most notably, KKLL used 'sugo' and 'gosaeng' approximately 3.1 times more often than KNS, with the largest disparity observed in their use toward higher-status interlocutors (4.4 times higher than KNS). The error patterns of KKLL were categorized into three types: (a) violation of social status constraints, (b) mismatch with the degree of imposition, and (c) semantic confusion between 'sugo' and 'gosaeng.' These errors appear to result from the combined influence of the Kazakh cultural emphasis on acknowledging others' efforts and the limited presentation of gratitude expressions in Korean textbooks.
    Based on these findings, this study proposes the need for explicit pragmatic instruction on the use constraints of 'sugo' and 'gosaeng,' a stepwise instructional design reflecting social variables, explicit comparison of Korean and Kazakh cultural norms in gratitude expression, and supplementation of textbook materials with authentic discourse data. This study is significant in that it provides a systematic analysis of the gratitude speech act use of Kazakh-speaking Korean learners, a population that has received relatively little scholarly attention, and offers a foundation for the development of tailored pragmatic instruction for Central Asian Korean language learners.
    번역하기

    This study aims to analyze the use patterns of the Korean speech act of gratitude by Kazakh-speaking Korean learners (KKLL), with a particular focus on the expressions 'sugo' and 'gosaeng,' and to propose pedagogical implications for Korean langua...

    This study aims to analyze the use patterns of the Korean speech act of gratitude by Kazakh-speaking Korean learners (KKLL), with a particular focus on the expressions 'sugo' and 'gosaeng,' and to propose pedagogical implications for Korean language education in Kazakhstan. These two expressions function as indirect gratitude markers that acknowledge the addressee's effort or hardship, but their use is governed by strict pragmatic constraints based on the social status of the interlocutors and the contextual weight of imposition. Since Kazakh lacks lexical equivalents that directly correspond to 'sugo' and 'gosaeng,' Kazakh-speaking learners are likely to face considerable pragmatic difficulties in acquiring these expressions.
    To investigate this issue, a Discourse Completion Test (DCT) consisting of 24 situations was administered to 30 Korean native speakers (KNS) and 30 Kazakh-speaking Korean learners (KKLL). The collected responses were analyzed based on a framework comprising 14 gratitude strategies, encompassing both direct and indirect gratitude expressions. The analysis examined strategy use patterns according to situation type, social variables (status, intimacy, degree of imposition), and the specific use of 'sugo' and 'gosaeng.'
    The results revealed both similarities and differences between the two groups. Both groups most frequently employed direct gratitude expressions (KNS 43.4%, KKLL 44.4%); however, KKLL used formulaic greetings (Strategy 2) approximately 2.9 times more often than KNS, while KNS used strategies such as emphasizing the listener's burden, self-deprecation, and humor more frequently. Most notably, KKLL used 'sugo' and 'gosaeng' approximately 3.1 times more often than KNS, with the largest disparity observed in their use toward higher-status interlocutors (4.4 times higher than KNS). The error patterns of KKLL were categorized into three types: (a) violation of social status constraints, (b) mismatch with the degree of imposition, and (c) semantic confusion between 'sugo' and 'gosaeng.' These errors appear to result from the combined influence of the Kazakh cultural emphasis on acknowledging others' efforts and the limited presentation of gratitude expressions in Korean textbooks.
    Based on these findings, this study proposes the need for explicit pragmatic instruction on the use constraints of 'sugo' and 'gosaeng,' a stepwise instructional design reflecting social variables, explicit comparison of Korean and Kazakh cultural norms in gratitude expression, and supplementation of textbook materials with authentic discourse data. This study is significant in that it provides a systematic analysis of the gratitude speech act use of Kazakh-speaking Korean learners, a population that has received relatively little scholarly attention, and offers a foundation for the development of tailored pragmatic instruction for Central Asian Korean language learners.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 서론 1
    • 1.1 연구 목적 및 필요성 1
    • 1.2 선행 연구 4
    • 1.2.1 감사 화행에 관한 연구 5
    • 1.2.2 감사 화행의 대조 및 학습자 연구 8
    • 1. 서론 1
    • 1.1 연구 목적 및 필요성 1
    • 1.2 선행 연구 4
    • 1.2.1 감사 화행에 관한 연구 5
    • 1.2.2 감사 화행의 대조 및 학습자 연구 8
    • 1.3 연구 문제와 절차 12
    • 2. 이론적 배경 14
    • 2.1 감사 화행의 개념과 범위 14
    • 2.2 감사 화행 전략의 유형 18
    • 2.3 한국어와 카자흐어 감사 표현 29
    • 2.4 ‘수고’와 ‘고생’의 의미와 화용적 특성 36
    • 3. 연구 방법 43
    • 3.1 연구 대상 43
    • 3.2 자료 조사 방법 44
    • 3.3 분석 방법 50
    • 4. 연구 결과 53
    • 4.1 한국어 모어 화자와 카자흐어권 한국어 학습자의 감사 화행 전략 사용 양상. 53
    • 4.2 감사 상황 유형에 따른 사용 양상 57
    • 4.2.1 상대방이 스스로 베푼 상황 (상황 1~12) 58
    • 4.2.2 화자의 요청에 따른 상황 (상황 13~24) 66
    • 4.2.3 두 상황 유형 간 비교 종합 73
    • 4.3 사회적 변인에 따른 감사 화행 전략 사용 양상 74
    • 4.3.1 사회적 지위에 따른 사용 양상 75
    • 4.3.2 친밀도에 따른 사용 양상 77
    • 4.3.3 부담감 정도에 따른 사용 양상 79
    • 4.4 ‘수고’와 ‘고생’ 표현의 사용 양상 81
    • 4.4.1 ‘수고’와 ‘고생’의 전체 사용 빈도 82
    • 4.4.2 사회적 지위에 따른 사용 양상 83
    • 4.4.3 친밀도에 따른 사용 양상 85
    • 4.4.4 부담감 정도에 따른 사용 양상 86
    • 4.4.5 ‘수고’와 ‘고생’ 사용 양상 종합 87
    • 4.5 카자흐어권 한국어 학습자의 ‘수고·고생’ 사용 오류 유형 88
    • 4.5.1 사회적 지위 제약 위반 오류 89
    • 4.5.2 부담의 크기 불일치 오류 90
    • 4.5.3 의미적 혼동 오류 91
    • 4.5.4 사용 오류의 종합과 발생 배경 92
    • 5. 결론 94
    • 참고문헌 98
    • 〈부록〉 103
    • ABSTRACT 112
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼