This study examines public backlash against Shell’s corporate greenwashing on YouTube through social network analysis, Structural Topic Modeling (STM), and BERT-based sentiment analysis. A total of 55 videos featuring Shell’s greenwashing-rela...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17545538
부산 : 국립부경대학교 대학원, 2026
학위논문(석사) -- 국립부경대학교 대학원 , 글로벌매니지먼트·거버넌스학과 , 2026. 8
2026
영어
부산
vi,47 ; 26 cm
지도교수: Sejung Park
I804:21031-200001035252
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This study examines public backlash against Shell’s corporate greenwashing on YouTube through social network analysis, Structural Topic Modeling (STM), and BERT-based sentiment analysis. A total of 55 videos featuring Shell’s greenwashing-rela...
This study examines public backlash against Shell’s corporate greenwashing on YouTube through social network analysis, Structural Topic Modeling (STM), and BERT-based sentiment analysis. A total of 55 videos featuring Shell’s greenwashing-related content, along with 6,339 comments and 4,995 replies, were collected. The videos uploaded between January 1,2014 and March 31, 2025, and their accompanying comments were collected. The data were divided into three temporal networks: T1 network (pre-litigation), T2 network (during litigation), and T3 network (post-verdict) – corresponding to key periods of Shell’s climate lawsuit. The dominant video content varied across networks: T1 network (n = 7 videos) focused on early concerns about Shell’s climate-related practices, T2 network (n = 39 videos) featured heightened criticism of Shell’s environmentally harmful business operations, and T3 network (n = 9 videos) primarily included coverage of Shell’s legal victory in the climate lawsuit. The study highlights change in networked interactions. Content analysis classified user-generated video contents into five blaming frames (emotional, factual, sarcastic, anti- corporate, non-blaming). STM analysis of comments under each blaming frame revealed frame-specific topics-e.g., “government oil greed” (emotional), “global climate problem” (factual), “planet saving sarcasm” (sarcastic), “energy market interest” (anti-corporate), “human energy use” (non-blaming)-while sentiment analysis showed approval dominant in blaming frames videos comments while neutral and approval in non-blaming. This study provides insight into how public sentiment and backlash against greenwashing are shaped through online networks, offering implications for corporate reputation management and helping companies reduce backlash damage.
목차 (Table of Contents)
로그인하고 관련된 다양한 학술자료를 확인해 보세요.
로그인