RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    만성 비특이성 요통에 대한 다층적 감각운동 재조직화 기반 중재의 효과 : 체계적 문헌고찰 및 메타분석 = Effects of Multilevel Sensorimotor Reorganization-Based Interventions on Pain and Disability in Patients with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17540481

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to systematically analyze the effects of multilevel sensorimotor reorganization-based interventions on pain and disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP), and to compare the effect sizes across different neuroregulatory levels. A total of 32 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected through a systematic literature search conducted across five databases (SCIENCE ON, EBSCOhost, PubMed, DBpia, and Cochrane Library) covering publications from January 2016 to March 2026, following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, and the included studies were classified into four intervention types based on neuroregulatory level: Proprioceptive exercise, Visual feedback–based exercise, Sensory cueing–based motor control exercise, and Perturbation-based balance training, with the primary outcome measures being pain intensity (VAS, NRS) and disability (ODI, RMDQ), and effect sizes calculated as standardized mean differences (SMD) using a random-effects model. The results showed that multilevel sensorimotor reorganization-based interventions significantly reduced pain (SMD=−0.88, 95%CI[−1.55,−0.21], p=0.012) and improved functional outcomes (SMD=−0.41, 95%CI[−0.80,−0.02], p=0.041) compared to control groups, and in the subgroup analysis by neuroregulatory level, all four intervention types demonstrated significant pain reduction effects with Visual feedback–based exercise showing the largest effect size (SMD=−0.80), while for disability outcomes only Proprioceptive exercise demonstrated a statistically significant improvement (SMD=−0.69), with significant subgroup differences identified for disability outcomes (Q=17.26, p=0.001) whereas no significant differences were found between neuroregulatory levels for pain outcomes, and publication bias was not statistically significant, and sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the overall findings. These findings suggest that multilevel sensorimotor reorganization-based interventions are effective for reducing pain and improving function in patients with CNSLBP, with Visual feedback–based exercise demonstrating relatively greater effects for pain reduction whereas Proprioceptive exercise may be considered when functional improvement is the primary treatment goal, and this study is meaningful in that it reinterpreted interventions for CNSLBP within a neuroregulatory hierarchy framework, with future high-quality RCTs with standardized intervention protocols needed to further clarify the differential effects of each neuroregulatory level.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to systematically analyze the effects of multilevel sensorimotor reorganization-based interventions on pain and disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP), and to compare the effect sizes ...

    The purpose of this study was to systematically analyze the effects of multilevel sensorimotor reorganization-based interventions on pain and disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP), and to compare the effect sizes across different neuroregulatory levels. A total of 32 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected through a systematic literature search conducted across five databases (SCIENCE ON, EBSCOhost, PubMed, DBpia, and Cochrane Library) covering publications from January 2016 to March 2026, following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, and the included studies were classified into four intervention types based on neuroregulatory level: Proprioceptive exercise, Visual feedback–based exercise, Sensory cueing–based motor control exercise, and Perturbation-based balance training, with the primary outcome measures being pain intensity (VAS, NRS) and disability (ODI, RMDQ), and effect sizes calculated as standardized mean differences (SMD) using a random-effects model. The results showed that multilevel sensorimotor reorganization-based interventions significantly reduced pain (SMD=−0.88, 95%CI[−1.55,−0.21], p=0.012) and improved functional outcomes (SMD=−0.41, 95%CI[−0.80,−0.02], p=0.041) compared to control groups, and in the subgroup analysis by neuroregulatory level, all four intervention types demonstrated significant pain reduction effects with Visual feedback–based exercise showing the largest effect size (SMD=−0.80), while for disability outcomes only Proprioceptive exercise demonstrated a statistically significant improvement (SMD=−0.69), with significant subgroup differences identified for disability outcomes (Q=17.26, p=0.001) whereas no significant differences were found between neuroregulatory levels for pain outcomes, and publication bias was not statistically significant, and sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the overall findings. These findings suggest that multilevel sensorimotor reorganization-based interventions are effective for reducing pain and improving function in patients with CNSLBP, with Visual feedback–based exercise demonstrating relatively greater effects for pain reduction whereas Proprioceptive exercise may be considered when functional improvement is the primary treatment goal, and this study is meaningful in that it reinterpreted interventions for CNSLBP within a neuroregulatory hierarchy framework, with future high-quality RCTs with standardized intervention protocols needed to further clarify the differential effects of each neuroregulatory level.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • (Abstract)
    • Ⅰ. 서 론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
    • 2. 연구의 목적 5
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 6
    • (Abstract)
    • Ⅰ. 서 론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
    • 2. 연구의 목적 5
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 6
    • 1. 만성 비특이성 요통 6
    • 1) 정의 및 진단 기준 6
    • 2) 역학 및 사회경제적 부담 7
    • 3) 병태생리: 감각운동 조절 이상 8
    • 2. 척추 안정화 시스템과 감각운동 통합 11
    • 3. 다층적 감각운동 재조직화 기반 중재 유형 13
    • 1) 고유감각 기반 중재 13
    • 2) 시각 피드백 기반 중재 14
    • 3) 감각 단서 기반 운동조절 훈련 15
    • 4) 외부 교란 기반 균형 훈련 16
    • 4. 메타분석의 정의 17
    • 5. 비뚤림 위험 평가 19
    • 6. 효과 크기 산출 20
    • 7. 메타분석 모형 선택 기준 21
    • 8. 이질성 평가 22
    • 9. 메타 ANOVA 분석(하위집단 분석) 23
    • 10. 민감도 분석 및 영향도 분석 24
    • 11. 출판 비뚤림 평가 25
    • 12. 메타회귀 분석 26
    • Ⅲ. 연구 방법 27
    • 1. 연구 설계 27
    • 2. 문헌 검색 전략 28
    • 3. 문헌 선정 기준 및 과정 30
    • 4. 데이터 추출 및 코딩 32
    • 5. 통계 분석 방법 35
    • Ⅳ. 연구 결과 37
    • 1. 선정된 문헌의 일반적 특성 37
    • 2. 선정 문헌의 비뚤림 위험(risk of bias) 평가 41
    • 3. 통증 평가에 따른 메타분석 결과 44
    • 4. 기능 평가에 따른 메타분석 결과 46
    • 5. 신경조절 위계 수준에 따른 하위집단 분석 결과 48
    • 1) 통증에 대한 하위집단 분석 결과 49
    • 2) 기능에 대한 하위집단 분석 결과 51
    • 6. 민감도 분석 53
    • 1) 통증에 대한 민감도 분석 53
    • 2) 기능에 대한 민감도 분석 57
    • 7. 출판편향 60
    • 1) 통증에 대한 출판편향 60
    • 2) 기능에 대한 출판편향 63
    • 8. 메타회귀 분석 66
    • Ⅴ. 고 찰 68
    • 1. 통증에 대한 중재 효과 해석 및 선행연구와의 비교 69
    • 2. 기능장애에 대한 중재 효과 해석 및 선행연구와의 비교 71
    • 3. 신경조절 위계 수준별 하위집단 분석 결과 해석 73
    • 4. 이질성 및 출판편향에 대한 해석 76
    • 5. 비뚤림 위험 평가 결과에 대한 해석 78
    • 6. 임상적 의의 79
    • 7. 연구의 제한점 81
    • Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 83
    • 참고 문헌 85
    • 부록 94
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼