With the increasing global demand for climate change mitigation and sustainable construction, reducing the environmental impact of the construction industry has become a critical issue. Concrete is one of the most widely used construction materials wo...
With the increasing global demand for climate change mitigation and sustainable construction, reducing the environmental impact of the construction industry has become a critical issue. Concrete is one of the most widely used construction materials worldwide, and ordinary Portland cement (OPC), the primary binder in concrete, is recognized as a major source of carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions due to its energy-intensive manufacturing process. Consequently, alternative approaches that reduce cement consumption or utilize supplementary materials have attracted significant research interest. In this context, eco-friendly concrete incorporating industrial by-products such as fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) has emerged as a promising solution for resource recycling and environmental impact reduction. However, previous studies have reported inconsistent results regarding the compressive strength development of eco-friendly concrete compared to conventional OPC concrete. In particular, fly ash and GGBS often exhibit delayed hydration reactions at early ages, which may lead to reduced early-age compressive strength depending on replacement ratio and mix design. Conversely, several studies have demonstrated comparable or even superior long-term strength performance due to pozzolanic and latent hydraulic reactions. These conflicting findings make it difficult to establish clear guidelines for practical application. The objective of this study is to conduct a literature-based meta-analysis comparing the performance and environmental characteristics of industrial by-product-based eco-friendly concrete and ordinary Portland cement concrete. Open-access domestic and international studies were systematically collected, and compressive strength data were analyzed considering replacement ratio, water-to-binder ratio, curing age, and strength level. The compressive strength ratio relative to OPC concrete was calculated, and statistical characteristics such as mean values and dispersion were evaluated for different strength categories. The results indicate that the compressive strength performance of eco-friendly concrete strongly depends on the target strength level. For normal-strength concrete, increasing the replacement ratio of fly ash or GGBS generally resulted in reduced early-age compressive strength. In contrast, high-strength concrete and ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) demonstrated comparable or improved compressive strength when appropriate mix designs were applied. In particular, GGBS-based concrete exhibited superior long-term strength development compared to OPC concrete. From an environmental perspective, the use of industrial by-products significantly reduces cement consumption, leading to a reduction in CO₂ emissions relative to ordinary Portland cement concrete. The findings of this study highlight that a balanced consideration of mechanical performance and environmental benefits is essential for the effective application of eco-friendly concrete. This study provides fundamental data for mix design and practical application of industrial by-product-based eco-friendly concrete and serves as a reference for future research incorporating durability assessment and life cycle assessment (LCA). Keywords : Industrial by-product-based eco-friendly concrete, Ordinary ,Portland cement concrete, Compressive strength, Meta-analysis, Environmental performance