In humanity's struggle against climate change, China is currently leading the way by producing most of the global renewable energy supply. Although China's technological advancements in renewable energy could help mitigate climate change, this is hard...
In humanity's struggle against climate change, China is currently leading the way by producing most of the global renewable energy supply. Although China's technological advancements in renewable energy could help mitigate climate change, this is hardly welcome news for liberal democracies concerned about relying on a geopolitical adversary for a strategically important resource. The current situation reflects a competition between environmental and geopolitical value frames for the public and policymakers, raising the question: Does dependence on geopolitical adversaries affect public perception of climate policies? Specifically, how will dependence on China for renewable energy affect the support for energy transition? Through a survey experiment in South Korea, I tested how China's dominance in renewables affected the support for the energy transition. The results showed that although dependence didn't affect public support, they also indicated that geopolitical values didn't precede environmental values among the general public. At the same time, the treatment led to a partisan divide, as it increased support for the energy transition among conservative supporters of the People Power Party (PPP). The analysis shows that the partisan division was motivated by geopolitical sentiments, leading PPP supporters to support domestic efforts to counter China's dominance in renewable energy. The findings demonstrate that the population continues to prioritize environmental values despite adverse geopolitical circumstances.