대학 유휴부지를 활용한 시니어 커뮤니티(UBRC) 도입을 위한 사례연구 : - 광주대학교와 장안대학교의 도입 가능성 중심으로 -

국문 초록 (Abstract)

대학의 학령인구 감소와 고령인구 증가가 동시에 진행되면서, 대학의 구조적 위
기와 시니어 주거수요 확대라는 이중 과제가 나타나고 있다. 본 연구는 이러한 인
구구조 변화 속에서 대학 유휴부지를 활용한 시니어 커뮤니티(UBRC) 도입의 타
당성을 검토하고, 한국형 UBRC 모델의 도입 가능성을 사례 분석을 통해 탐색하
는 데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 광주대학교와 장안대학교를 대상으로 입지 여건, 제
도적 환경, 재정적 타당성, 이해관계자 인식 등을 중심으로 분석을 수행하였다.
연구 방법으로는 국내외 UBRC 관련 사례조사와 교수, 민간개발자, 운영자 등의
심층 인터뷰를 병행하여 대학의 공간 활용성과 민간 참여 가능성, 제도적 제약 요
인을 종합적으로 검토하였다. 또한 여러 개발 시나리오를 비교하여 복합용도 개발
과 민관 협력 방식이 UBRC 도입의 재무적 안정성과 운영 지속성을 높이는 요인
임을 확인하였다.
분석 결과, UBRC는 대학의 교육·문화·복지 인프라와 고령층 수요를 연계함으로
써 시니어 주거문제 해결과 대학의 역할 확장에 기여할 수 있는 대안적 모델로 도
출되었다. 특히 지자체의 제도적 지원과 민간투자 구조가 결합될 경우 UBRC 도
입 가능성은 더욱 높아지는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 대학 유휴부지 활용을 고
령친화 정책 및 대학 혁신 전략과 연계할 수 있는 실증적 근거를 제시한다는 점에
서 학술적·정책적 의의를 가진다.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론 ·········································································································1
• 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 ········································································1
• 2. 연구의 범위 및 방법········································································ 2
• 3. 연구의 구성 ························································································ 3
• Ⅱ. 이론적 고찰 및 선행연구 ··································································5
• 1. 시니어 커뮤니티의 개념과 발전과정 ············································ 5
• 2. 대학연계형 시니어 커뮤니티(UBRC)의 개념과 특징 ················ 7
• 1) UBRC의 개념 ················································································ 7
• 2) UBRC 도입 필요성 ···································································· 8
• 3) UBRC의 구조적 특징 ·································································· 9
• 3. 국내외 UBRC 사례 고찰 ·······························································11
• 1) 해외 사례 ····················································································11
• 2) 국내 사례 ····················································································20
• 4. 선행연구 검토 및 본 연구의 차별성 ·········································· 24
• Ⅲ. UBRC 도입을 둘러싼 환경 ························································· 26
• 1. 사회적 환경 변화 ············································································22
• 2. 대학의 구조적 여건········································································ 27
• 3. 정책 및 제도적 환경 ····································································· 27
• 4. 소결 ·································································································· 28
• - iv -
• Ⅳ. UBRC 도입을 위한 개념모델 설정 ··········································· 29
• 1. 한국형 UBRC의 개념모델 설정 ·····················································30
• 1) 한국형 UBRC의 개념적 정의 ··················································31
• 2) 정책 환경과 제도적 기반 ··························································31
• 3) UBRC 개념모델의 구조적 구성 ·············································· 33
• 2. 도입을 위한 추진체계 구상···························································· 35
• 1) 추진체계의 기본 구상 ································································35
• 2) 도입 단계별 추진 구도······························································36
• 3) 단계별 핵심 전략과 추진 방향 ················································39
• 3. 대학 참여 및 거버넌스 체계·························································· 41
• 1) 대학의 역할과 기능 ····································································41
• 2) 공공기관 및 지자체의 역할 ······················································42
• 3) 민간운영기관 및 개발자의 역할 ··············································43
• 4) UBRC 거버넌스 체계 구성 ······················································ 44
• 4. 도입 효과 및 시사점······································································46
• 1) 사회적 측면 ··················································································46
• 2) 대학 측면······················································································46
• 3) 정책적 측면 ··················································································47
• 4) 종합적 시사점 ··············································································48
• 5. 요약 ······································································································ 49
• Ⅴ. UBRC 도입 가능성 분석 ······························································50
• 1. 연구개요 및 분석 틀 ····································································· 50
• 1) 연구목적 ························································································50
• 2) 분석대상 및 선정이유 ································································51
• 3) 분석방법 ························································································52
• - v -
• 4) 분석 틀 제시 ················································································54
• 5) 연구의 흐름도 ··············································································55
• 2. UBRC 도입 가능성 평가 기준 설정 ·············································56
• 3. 대상 대학의 입지 및 제도 여건 분석 ·········································· 57
• 1) 광주대학교 도입 여건 분석 ····················································· 57
• 2) 장안대학교 도입 여건 분석 ····················································· 58
• 3) 소결 ································································································61
• 4. 이해관계자 인터뷰 분석 ·································································· 62
• 1) 인터뷰 개요 ··················································································62
• 2) 인터뷰 대상 및 질문 구성 ························································63
• 3) 그룹별 인터뷰 분석 ································································· 65
• 4) 공통인식과 도입의 주요 시사점 ············································· 70
• 5. UBRC 도입의 사업성 및 수익성 분석 ·········································72
• 1) 분석방법 및 기본 가정······························································72
• 2) 광주대학교 사업성 분석·························································· 73
• 3) 장안대학교 사업성 분석····························································77
• 4) 사례비교 및 시사점 ····································································79
• 6. 종합평가 및 시사점 ·········································································· 82
• 1) 공통인식 ························································································82
• 2) 사업성 및 수익성 요약······························································83
• 3) 통합평가 ························································································83
• 4) 정책적 시사점 ··············································································84
• Ⅵ. 결론 및 정책적 제언 ········································································85
• 1. 연구결과 요약 및 주요 결론··························································85
• 2. 정책적 제언 ························································································ 86
• - vi -
• 3. 연구의 한계 및 향후 연구과제 ······················································ 87
• 참고문헌 ······································································································88
• Abstract ······································································································91
• 부록 ·············································································································· 93