2-Dodecylisoquinolinium bromide (DB) and hexetidine are antimicrobial preservatives used in cosmetic products under regulatory concentration limits: DB is allowed up to 0.05% in leave-on cosmetics in Korea, while hexetidine is permitted up to 0.1% in ...
2-Dodecylisoquinolinium bromide (DB) and hexetidine are antimicrobial preservatives used in cosmetic products under regulatory concentration limits: DB is allowed up to 0.05% in leave-on cosmetics in Korea, while hexetidine is permitted up to 0.1% in rinse-off products in Korea, and European Union. Because dermal absorption data for both ingredients in cosmetic matrices have been limited, in vitro dermal absorption studies were performed in compliance with the guideline according to the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety of Korea. Prior to the dermal absorption experiments, LC–MS/MS methods using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) were developed and validated to quantify each analyte in key study matrices, including swabs, stratum corneum (SC), skin (dermis + epidermis), and receptor fluid (RF). The DB method showed well-fitted linearity (r² = 0.9904–0.9995), accuracy (91.8–113.7%), and precision (0.6–8.5%), and the hexetidine method demonstrated excellent performance with linearity (r² = 0.9944–0.9999), accuracy (80.9–108.3%), and precision (0.6–16.1%) in accordance with validation guidelines. Dermal absorption was evaluated using Franz diffusion cells with integrity-verified Micro-pig skin. Cream formulations containing 0.038% or 0.0127% of DB were applied at 10 μL/cm². After 24 hr, the skin surface was wiped with swabs. SC was collected by tape stripping and the remaining skin was sectioned into eight pieces. RF samples were collected at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hr. Total dermal absorption of DB was 0.08 ± 0.05 μg/cm² (2.18 ± 1.06%) for the 0.038% cream and 0.04 ± 0.02 μg/cm² (3.05 ± 1.79%) for the 0.0127% cream, with no detectable DB in RF for either formulation. However, the overall recovery (47.25 ± 25.11%) for the 0.0127% DB cream. did not meet acceptable range for mass balance/recovery (e.g., 85–115%), indicating that the low-dose DB results should be interpreted cautiously. In contrast, the recovery of the 0.038% cream was 97.79 ± 9.84%, which met the acceptance criteria for recovery. For hexetidine, 0.1% and 0.025% gel shampoo (rinse-off) formulations were applied at the same dose (10 μL/cm²) for 30 min, followed by a wash-out step to simulate shampoo-use conditions. Total dermal absorption of hexetidine was 0.008 ± 0.006 μg/cm² (0.07 ± 0.06%) for the 0.1% formulation, and 0.00 ± 0.00 μg/cm² (0.00 ± 0.00%) for the 0.025% formulation. Total recovery was 86.59 ± 13.69% for the 0.1% formulation, and 97.21 ± 2.03% for the 0.025% formulation, and both values met the acceptance criteria for recovery. Collectively, these findings provide substance- and formulation-specific dermal absorption data to support exposure assessment of the preservatives when DB and hexetidine are used as cosmetic ingredients.