RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Analytical method development and dermal absorption of cosmetic preservatives, 2-dodecylisoquinolinium bromide (DB) and hexetidine using Franz diffusion cells.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17411119

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      2-Dodecylisoquinolinium bromide (DB) and hexetidine are antimicrobial preservatives used in cosmetic products under regulatory concentration limits: DB is allowed up to 0.05% in leave-on cosmetics in Korea, while hexetidine is permitted up to 0.1% in rinse-off products in Korea, and European Union. Because dermal absorption data for both ingredients in cosmetic matrices have been limited, in vitro dermal absorption studies were performed in compliance with the guideline according to the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety of Korea. Prior to the dermal absorption experiments, LC–MS/MS methods using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) were developed and validated to quantify each analyte in key study matrices, including swabs, stratum corneum (SC), skin (dermis + epidermis), and receptor fluid (RF). The DB method showed well-fitted linearity (r² = 0.9904–0.9995), accuracy (91.8–113.7%), and precision (0.6–8.5%), and the hexetidine method demonstrated excellent performance with linearity (r² = 0.9944–0.9999), accuracy (80.9–108.3%), and precision (0.6–16.1%) in accordance with validation guidelines. Dermal absorption was evaluated using Franz diffusion cells with integrity-verified Micro-pig skin. Cream formulations containing 0.038% or 0.0127% of DB were applied at 10 μL/cm². After 24 hr, the skin surface was wiped with swabs. SC was collected by tape stripping and the remaining skin was sectioned into eight pieces. RF samples were collected at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hr. Total dermal absorption of DB was 0.08 ± 0.05 μg/cm² (2.18 ± 1.06%) for the 0.038% cream and 0.04 ± 0.02 μg/cm² (3.05 ± 1.79%) for the 0.0127% cream, with no detectable DB in RF for either formulation. However, the overall recovery (47.25 ± 25.11%) for the 0.0127% DB cream. did not meet acceptable range for mass balance/recovery (e.g., 85–115%), indicating that the low-dose DB results should be interpreted cautiously. In contrast, the recovery of the 0.038% cream was 97.79 ± 9.84%, which met the acceptance criteria for recovery. For hexetidine, 0.1% and 0.025% gel shampoo (rinse-off) formulations were applied at the same dose (10 μL/cm²) for 30 min, followed by a wash-out step to simulate shampoo-use conditions. Total dermal absorption of hexetidine was 0.008 ± 0.006 μg/cm² (0.07 ± 0.06%) for the 0.1% formulation, and 0.00 ± 0.00 μg/cm² (0.00 ± 0.00%) for the 0.025% formulation. Total recovery was 86.59 ± 13.69% for the 0.1% formulation, and 97.21 ± 2.03% for the 0.025% formulation, and both values met the acceptance criteria for recovery. Collectively, these findings provide substance- and formulation-specific dermal absorption data to support exposure assessment of the preservatives when DB and hexetidine are used as cosmetic ingredients.
      번역하기

      2-Dodecylisoquinolinium bromide (DB) and hexetidine are antimicrobial preservatives used in cosmetic products under regulatory concentration limits: DB is allowed up to 0.05% in leave-on cosmetics in Korea, while hexetidine is permitted up to 0.1% in ...

      2-Dodecylisoquinolinium bromide (DB) and hexetidine are antimicrobial preservatives used in cosmetic products under regulatory concentration limits: DB is allowed up to 0.05% in leave-on cosmetics in Korea, while hexetidine is permitted up to 0.1% in rinse-off products in Korea, and European Union. Because dermal absorption data for both ingredients in cosmetic matrices have been limited, in vitro dermal absorption studies were performed in compliance with the guideline according to the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety of Korea. Prior to the dermal absorption experiments, LC–MS/MS methods using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) were developed and validated to quantify each analyte in key study matrices, including swabs, stratum corneum (SC), skin (dermis + epidermis), and receptor fluid (RF). The DB method showed well-fitted linearity (r² = 0.9904–0.9995), accuracy (91.8–113.7%), and precision (0.6–8.5%), and the hexetidine method demonstrated excellent performance with linearity (r² = 0.9944–0.9999), accuracy (80.9–108.3%), and precision (0.6–16.1%) in accordance with validation guidelines. Dermal absorption was evaluated using Franz diffusion cells with integrity-verified Micro-pig skin. Cream formulations containing 0.038% or 0.0127% of DB were applied at 10 μL/cm². After 24 hr, the skin surface was wiped with swabs. SC was collected by tape stripping and the remaining skin was sectioned into eight pieces. RF samples were collected at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hr. Total dermal absorption of DB was 0.08 ± 0.05 μg/cm² (2.18 ± 1.06%) for the 0.038% cream and 0.04 ± 0.02 μg/cm² (3.05 ± 1.79%) for the 0.0127% cream, with no detectable DB in RF for either formulation. However, the overall recovery (47.25 ± 25.11%) for the 0.0127% DB cream. did not meet acceptable range for mass balance/recovery (e.g., 85–115%), indicating that the low-dose DB results should be interpreted cautiously. In contrast, the recovery of the 0.038% cream was 97.79 ± 9.84%, which met the acceptance criteria for recovery. For hexetidine, 0.1% and 0.025% gel shampoo (rinse-off) formulations were applied at the same dose (10 μL/cm²) for 30 min, followed by a wash-out step to simulate shampoo-use conditions. Total dermal absorption of hexetidine was 0.008 ± 0.006 μg/cm² (0.07 ± 0.06%) for the 0.1% formulation, and 0.00 ± 0.00 μg/cm² (0.00 ± 0.00%) for the 0.025% formulation. Total recovery was 86.59 ± 13.69% for the 0.1% formulation, and 97.21 ± 2.03% for the 0.025% formulation, and both values met the acceptance criteria for recovery. Collectively, these findings provide substance- and formulation-specific dermal absorption data to support exposure assessment of the preservatives when DB and hexetidine are used as cosmetic ingredients.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. Introduction 1
      • II. Materials and Methods 10
      • 1. Chemicals and reagents 10
      • 2. Analytical methods 12
      • 2.1 Equipment 12
      • Ⅰ. Introduction 1
      • II. Materials and Methods 10
      • 1. Chemicals and reagents 10
      • 2. Analytical methods 12
      • 2.1 Equipment 12
      • 2.2 LC conditions 12
      • 2.2.1 2-Dodecylisoquinolinium bromide (DB) 12
      • 2.2.2 Hexetidine 12
      • 2.3 Mass spectrometric conditions 13
      • 2.3.1 2-Dodecylisoquinolinium bromide (DB) 13
      • 2.3.2 Hexetidine 13
      • 2.4 Preparation of calibration standards and QC samples 17
      • 2.4.1 2-Dodecylisoquinolinium bromide (DB) 17
      • 2.4.2 Hexetidine 17
      • 2.5 Analytical method validation 19
      • 2.5.1 Selectivity and linearity 19
      • 2.5.2 Accuracy and precision 20
      • 2.5.3 LLOQ and acceptance criteria 21
      • 3. In vitro dermal absorption 21
      • 3.1 Selection and preparation of test formulations 21
      • 3.2 Skin preparation 24
      • 3.3 Receptor fluid selection 24
      • 3.4 Micro-pig skin integrity and dosing volume 24
      • 3.4.1 In vitro dermal absorption experiment of DB 25
      • 3.4.2 In vitro dermal absorption experiment of hexetidine 25
      • 4. Statistical analysis 28
      • Ⅲ. Results 29
      • 1. Validation of analytical methodology 29
      • 1.1 Selectivity 29
      • 1.2 Linearity 36
      • 1.3 Lower limits of quantification (LLOQ) 38
      • 1.4 Accuracy & Precision 38
      • 2. In vitro dermal absorption 42
      • 2.1 Skin integrity 42
      • 2.2 In vitro dermal absorption of DB 44
      • 2.3 In vitro dermal absorption of hexetidine 44
      • Ⅳ. Discussion 49
      • V. Conclusion 56
      • References 57
      • Abstract (in Korean) 63
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼