RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    중환자실 간호사의 의사소통 능력, 도덕적 민감성이 옹호간호에 미치는 영향 = The Effect of Intensive Care Unit Nurses’ Communication Competence and Moral Sensitivity on Advocacy Nursing

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17410232

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study is a descriptive correlational study designed to examine
    the effects of communication competence and moral sensitivity on
    advocacy nursing among intensive care unit nurses.
    Data were collected from October 2 to October 12, 2025, through a
    survey of 132 ICU nurses who had worked for more than six months
    at university hospitals with 500 or more beds located in D City. The
    collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test,
    ANOVA, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and multiple regression
    analysis with the SPSS/WIN 30.0 program.
    The results of this study are summarized as follows: The advocacy
    nursing score of intensive care unit (ICU) nurses was 3.61±0.41 out - 81 -
    of 5. Significant differences in advocacy nursing were found
    according to age (F=4.34, p=.015), total clinical experience (F=3.62,
    p=.015), and work experience in the current ICU department
    (F=4.58, p=.004). Advocacy nursing demonstrated significant
    positive correlations with communication competence (r=.23,
    p=.008) and moral sensitivity (r=.44, p<.001), indicating that higher
    levels of communication competence and moral sensitivity were
    associated with higher levels of advocacy nursing.
    Factors influencing advocacy nursing included moral sensitivity
    (β=.47, p<.001), communication competence (β=.16, p=.037), and
    work experience in the current department (β=.25, p=.037),
    collectively explaining 27.8% of the variance in advocacy nursing.
    These findings confirm that communication competence and moral
    sensitivity are important predictors of advocacy nursing among ICU
    nurses. Therefore, to strengthen advocacy nursing competency, it is
    essential to maintain and enhance moral sensitivity, support nurses’
    adaptation within their unit, and improve effective communication
    competence. Developing and implementing tailored education
    programs—reflecting real clinical situations—to strengthen ethical
    awareness and communication skills is recommended.
    Keywords: Communication Competence, Moral Sensitivity, Advocacy
    Nursing, Intensive care nuit nurses
    번역하기

    This study is a descriptive correlational study designed to examine the effects of communication competence and moral sensitivity on advocacy nursing among intensive care unit nurses. Data were collected from October 2 to October 12, 2025, through ...

    This study is a descriptive correlational study designed to examine
    the effects of communication competence and moral sensitivity on
    advocacy nursing among intensive care unit nurses.
    Data were collected from October 2 to October 12, 2025, through a
    survey of 132 ICU nurses who had worked for more than six months
    at university hospitals with 500 or more beds located in D City. The
    collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test,
    ANOVA, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and multiple regression
    analysis with the SPSS/WIN 30.0 program.
    The results of this study are summarized as follows: The advocacy
    nursing score of intensive care unit (ICU) nurses was 3.61±0.41 out - 81 -
    of 5. Significant differences in advocacy nursing were found
    according to age (F=4.34, p=.015), total clinical experience (F=3.62,
    p=.015), and work experience in the current ICU department
    (F=4.58, p=.004). Advocacy nursing demonstrated significant
    positive correlations with communication competence (r=.23,
    p=.008) and moral sensitivity (r=.44, p<.001), indicating that higher
    levels of communication competence and moral sensitivity were
    associated with higher levels of advocacy nursing.
    Factors influencing advocacy nursing included moral sensitivity
    (β=.47, p<.001), communication competence (β=.16, p=.037), and
    work experience in the current department (β=.25, p=.037),
    collectively explaining 27.8% of the variance in advocacy nursing.
    These findings confirm that communication competence and moral
    sensitivity are important predictors of advocacy nursing among ICU
    nurses. Therefore, to strengthen advocacy nursing competency, it is
    essential to maintain and enhance moral sensitivity, support nurses’
    adaptation within their unit, and improve effective communication
    competence. Developing and implementing tailored education
    programs—reflecting real clinical situations—to strengthen ethical
    awareness and communication skills is recommended.
    Keywords: Communication Competence, Moral Sensitivity, Advocacy
    Nursing, Intensive care nuit nurses

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 국문요지 = i
    • 차례 = iii
    • 표차례 = v
    • 부록차례 = vi
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 국문요지 = i
    • 차례 = iii
    • 표차례 = v
    • 부록차례 = vi
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 = 1
    • 2. 연구 목적 = 4
    • 3. 용어의 정의 = 5
    • II. 문헌고찰 = 7
    • 1. 중환자실 간호사의 의사소통 능력 = 7
    • 2. 중환자실 간호사의 도덕적 민감성 및 임상적 역할 = 11
    • 3. 중환자실 간호사의 옹호간호: 개념적 고찰과 영향 요인의 중요성 = 14
    • III. 연구 방법 = 19
    • 1. 연구 설계 = 19
    • 2. 연구 대상 = 19
    • 3. 연구 도구 = 20
    • 4. 자료수집 절차 = 23
    • 5. 윤리적 고려 = 24
    • 6. 자료분석 방법 = 25
    • IV. 연구 결과 = 26
    • 1. 대상자의 일반적 특성 = 26
    • 2. 대상자의 의사소통 능력, 도덕적 민감성, 옹호간호의 정도 = 28
    • 3. 대상자의 일반적 특성에 따른 의사소통 능력의 차이 = 30
    • 4. 대상자의 일반적 특성에 따른 도덕적 민감성의 차이 = 33
    • 5. 대상자의 일반적 특성에 따른 옹호간호의 차이 = 35
    • 6. 대상자의 의사소통 능력, 도덕적 민감성, 옹호간호 간의 상관관계 = 37
    • 7. 대상자의 옹호간호에 영향을 미치는 요인 = 38
    • V. 논의 = 40
    • VI. 결론 및 제언 = 48
    • 1. 결론 = 48
    • 2. 제언 = 50
    • 참고문헌 = 51
    • 부록 = 61
    • ABSTRACT = 81
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼