This thesis analyzes the conditions under which the United States advanced or curtailed human rights promotion in its foreign policy toward South Korea between 1976 and 1987. To explain variation in U.S. behavior, the study develops a conditional fram...
This thesis analyzes the conditions under which the United States advanced or curtailed human rights promotion in its foreign policy toward South Korea between 1976 and 1987. To explain variation in U.S. behavior, the study develops a conditional framework in which outcomes depend on the interaction of two variables: normative pressure (domestic and international demands for moral action) and security threat (perceived military or geopolitical risk).The thesis examines five critical cases: the Koreagate scandal, the troop-withdrawal debate, diplomacy under the Yushin regime, the Park Chung Hee assassination, and the Kwangju Uprising.
The findings show that U.S. human rights policy was consistently shaped by the strategic environment. High pressure combined with low threat (Koreagate) enabled assertive human rights engagement. High pressure combined with high threat (troop withdrawal) produced strong rhetoric but limited substantive action. Low pressure combined with high threat (Yushin diplomacy, Park assassination, and the Kwangju Uprising) resulted in quiet or symbolic diplomacy as security and alliance considerations dominated decision-making. Across all cases, bureaucratic actors reinforced a stability-first posture and narrowed the space for meaningful rights promotion even when presidential rhetoric was supportive.
The study concludes that U.S. policy toward South Korea operated as a form of conditional realism, in which moral commitments remained possible but only when they did not conflict with overriding security imperatives. This framework clarifies the causal mechanisms linking pressure, threat, and policy outcomes and contributes to broader debates on moral diplomacy, alliance management, and Cold War foreign policy.
Keywords: U.S. foreign policy; human rights promotion; U.S.–South Korea alliance; Cold War security; normative pressure; security threat