The building sector accounts for approximately 30% of global energy consumption, with HVAC systems in office buildings responsible for over 40% of total energy consumption. Despite the fact that HVAC capacity calculations directly impact energy perfor...
The building sector accounts for approximately 30% of global energy consumption, with HVAC systems in office buildings responsible for over 40% of total energy consumption. Despite the fact that HVAC capacity calculations directly impact energy performance, operating costs, and thermal comfort, the domestic total energy performance evaluation system still lacks standards for calculating autosizing HVAC system capacity. This results in recurring practical problems such as energy waste due to overestimated- or underestimated-HVAC design and thermal discomfort for occupants. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to quantify the impact of autosizing HVAC capacity calculation methods for office buildings in code-compliant simulations, considering occupant comfort and energy efficiency. The impact of various HVAC capacity calculation methods were evaluated on the energy use intensity (EUI) and thermal comfort (PMV·acceptable ratio) based on Korea's total energy performance code-based model to improve HVAC capacity calculation methods incode-compliant simulations. To achieve this, a DOE medium office prototype-based model was adapted to reflect Korea's climate, insulation, and scheduling conditions. The test simulations were conducted using DesignBuilder on a total of 320 cases, including VAV and VRF systems, Design days of 0.4%, 1.0%, and 2.5%, the Energy-saving design standards Annex 7, and ASHRAE Appendix G method. The analysis revealed that the application of the autosizing methods showed capacity variations within approximately ±5% depending on climate and insulation characteristics. Furthermore, while the VAV systems showed a significant increase in energy consumption and deterioration of thermal comfort performance as capacity increased, The VRF systems exhibited relatively stable energy use and thermal comfort performance, confirming distinguished energy use between HVAC system types. These tendencies were particularly pronounced in the Southern Region, Jeju, and under high-density occupancy schedules, the results indicated the need for an appropriate HVAC system capacity margin of approximately 1.1–1.2. This study provides the basis for total building energy performance evaluation system using HVAC autosizing, which will contribute to improving HVAC capacity calculation methods in future total building energy performance evaluation system.