This study provides a comprehensive analysis of Li Kan’s (1245–1320) Zhupu Xianglu (竹譜詳錄), with particular emphasis on the Huzhou Bamboo School (湖州竹派), in order to elucidate its underlying aesthetic and philosophical system. More t...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17402010
화성 : 수원대학교, 2026
학위논문(석사) -- 수원대학교 , 조형예술학과(서예) , 2026. 2
2026
한국어
경기도
26 cm
지도교수: 양호승
I804:41031-200000973108
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This study provides a comprehensive analysis of Li Kan’s (1245–1320) Zhupu Xianglu (竹譜詳錄), with particular emphasis on the Huzhou Bamboo School (湖州竹派), in order to elucidate its underlying aesthetic and philosophical system. More t...
This study provides a comprehensive analysis of Li Kan’s (1245–1320) Zhupu Xianglu (竹譜詳錄), with particular emphasis on the Huzhou Bamboo School (湖州竹派), in order to elucidate its underlying aesthetic and philosophical system. More than a technical manual on ink-bamboo painting, the Zhupu Xianglu constitutes a metaphysical reflection on artistic creation, integrating the literati ideals inherited from Wen Tong (文同) and Su Shi (蘇軾). The primary objective of this research is to reconstruct the aesthetic framework of the Huzhou Bamboo School by examining the interrelations among Qi (vital energy), Shi (dynamic configuration), Brush Method (bifa), and shencai (spiritual brilliance).
The study employs a triadic methodology combining philological investigation, art-historical comparison, and aesthetic interpretation. The Siku Quanshu edition serves as the textual foundation, supplemented by Zhao Tianye’s (2023) annotated commentary. Through comparative analysis of the intellectual lineage extending from Wen Tong and Su Shi to Li Kan, Wu Zhen, Wen Zhengming, and Zheng Xie, this research situates the Zhupu Xianglu within a continuous trajectory of literati aesthetic development.
The findings reveal that Li Kan’s principle—“Qi moves the brush, and shi forms the bamboo stem” (氣以運筆, 勢以成竿)—articulates an ontological unity between inner vitality and external structure. In this conception, Qi constitutes the internal life-force and source of artistic animation, whereas shi embodies the visible rhythm and formal tension of the composition. Painting thereby transcends mere imitation, becoming a practice of self-cultivation (修身) and a realization of Dao through brush and ink. Furthermore, the Huzhou Bamboo School is shown to integrate the Confucian ideal of moral integrity (dexiang lun 德象論), Daoist notions of natural spontaneity (自然觀), and Chan Buddhist insight into the mind (心源論). Li Kan’s dictum—“To paint Qi with the brush, to move the mind through Qi, and to unite the mind with Dao”—encapsulates this triadic harmony.
Subsequent artists, including Wu Zhen, Wen Zhengming, and Zheng Xie, embodied this philosophical orientation in distinct modes—ranging from yige (逸格, transcendental simplicity) and yazhi (雅致, refined elegance) to xinxie zhu (寫心不寫竹, painting the heart rather than the bamboo).
Ultimately, the Zhupu Xianglu represents a culmination of the literati painting tradition, unifying the technical (形而下) and the metaphysical (形而上) dimensions of art. It affirms the proposition that “the Way of brush and ink is identical with the Way of self-cultivation” (筆墨之道, 卽修身之道), thereby positioning Li Kan as a pivotal figure who transformed painting into a metaphysical act through which the unity of Dao, Mind, and Form is realized.
목차 (Table of Contents)