This study aims to identify and prioritize optimal technological, policy, and economic strategies to effectively reduce methane (CH4) emissions from rice paddy cultivation, thereby contributing to the realization of carbon neutrality in the agricultur...
This study aims to identify and prioritize optimal technological, policy, and economic strategies to effectively reduce methane (CH4) emissions from rice paddy cultivation, thereby contributing to the realization of carbon neutrality in the agricultural sector. To achieve this, a scientific and quantitative evaluation framework based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was employed, using four multidimensional criteria: effectiveness, economic feasibility, environmental impact, and social acceptability.
A comprehensive review of both domestic and international methane mitigation practices was conducted, leading to the selection of candidate strategies, including Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD), organic matter management, and the dissemination of low-methane rice cultivars as technological alternatives. Policy and economic instruments such as emissions trading schemes, direct payment incentives, low-methane certification programs, and local government partnerships were also incorporated. The AHP model was structured in four hierarchical levels (overall goal – evaluation criteria – support type – specific alternatives), and expert evaluations were conducted across two groups: academic researchers and policy practitioners, allowing for the integration of diverse perspectives.
The results indicate that AWD was identified as the highest priority among technological options, while emissions trading and direct payments were highly rated in policy and economic categories, respectively. Notable differences emerged between expert groups: researchers emphasized technical efficacy and environmental impact, whereas policy experts focused on institutional feasibility and farmer participation. A scenario-based simulation was subsequently conducted, combining high-priority strategies. The scenario integrating AWD, direct payments, and emissions trading yielded the greatest methane reduction and economic benefits.
This study provides an integrated, field-applicable mitigation model that reflects both scientific rigor and practical viability. By combining AHP-based policy evaluation with simulation analysis, the research establishes a strategic framework that can support agricultural climate policy formulation, carbon market integration, and region-specific action plans. The methodological approach and findings offer meaningful contributions toward the achievement of carbon neutrality in agriculture and can be expanded to other crops or environmental sectors.