RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      해운선사의 컨테이너 데미지 관리에 관한 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17396203

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study provides a comprehensive examination of the container damage management system of shipping companies from normative, institutional, and operational perspectives, while empirically analyzing the structural characteristics of repair costs and the allocation of liability based on real operational data. As maritime cargo constitutes the majority of global freight movement, container damage occurs frequently, resulting in significant repair expenditures for shipping lines. To address this, the study establishes a normative framework grounded in the Code of Practice for Packing of Cargo Transport Units (CTU Code) jointly issued by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), International Labour Organization (ILO), and United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), the IICL Repair Manual, and Korea’s Container Safety Inspection Standards. Based on these, the study analyzes the criteria for repair determination, patterns of damage, cost structures, and the flow of liability attribution derived from actual operational data. Furthermore, the research identifies persistent inefficiencies in the management system, particularly in third-party damage claim cases, which arise from incomplete documentation, non-standardized claim and fault-determination procedures, and asymmetrical information among the responsible entities. Empirical analysis was conducted using real records from a shipping company, including container repair logs, cost data, and claim histories. The study examined the number of repairs, repair ratios, and unit repair costs by container type, followed by quantitative comparisons to assess changes resulting from specific policy applications and improvement measures. To complement the data analysis, photographic evidence and inspection records were utilized to visually verify damage types and the responsible parties, enabling the identification of practical accountability routes that numerical data alone could not fully capture. Moreover, the study explores how inconsistencies in fault determination emerge from incomplete EIRs (Equipment Interchange Receipts) and the absence of standardized claim procedures, proposing systematic and procedural improvements to resolve these issues. By integrating empirical data analysis with a normative review, this research demonstrates that container damage management is not merely a matter of reducing repair costs, but a comprehensive management domain encompassing prevention, responsibility, documentation, and policy coordination. In particular, by combining visual validation of damage cases with analytical tracing of cost and liability, the study presents a new analytical framework in which regulatory standards, data evidence, and field experience reinforce one another. The findings of this study are expected to contribute to improving the operational efficiency and cost management of damaged containers, enhancing transparency in the distribution of responsibility, and promoting the standardization and strategic direction of container management practices within the shipping industry.
      Keywords : Container Damage, Container Repair, Container Damage Responsibility, C ontainer Transport Risk, Case-Based Analysis
      번역하기

      This study provides a comprehensive examination of the container damage management system of shipping companies from normative, institutional, and operational perspectives, while empirically analyzing the structural characteristics of repair costs and...

      This study provides a comprehensive examination of the container damage management system of shipping companies from normative, institutional, and operational perspectives, while empirically analyzing the structural characteristics of repair costs and the allocation of liability based on real operational data. As maritime cargo constitutes the majority of global freight movement, container damage occurs frequently, resulting in significant repair expenditures for shipping lines. To address this, the study establishes a normative framework grounded in the Code of Practice for Packing of Cargo Transport Units (CTU Code) jointly issued by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), International Labour Organization (ILO), and United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), the IICL Repair Manual, and Korea’s Container Safety Inspection Standards. Based on these, the study analyzes the criteria for repair determination, patterns of damage, cost structures, and the flow of liability attribution derived from actual operational data. Furthermore, the research identifies persistent inefficiencies in the management system, particularly in third-party damage claim cases, which arise from incomplete documentation, non-standardized claim and fault-determination procedures, and asymmetrical information among the responsible entities. Empirical analysis was conducted using real records from a shipping company, including container repair logs, cost data, and claim histories. The study examined the number of repairs, repair ratios, and unit repair costs by container type, followed by quantitative comparisons to assess changes resulting from specific policy applications and improvement measures. To complement the data analysis, photographic evidence and inspection records were utilized to visually verify damage types and the responsible parties, enabling the identification of practical accountability routes that numerical data alone could not fully capture. Moreover, the study explores how inconsistencies in fault determination emerge from incomplete EIRs (Equipment Interchange Receipts) and the absence of standardized claim procedures, proposing systematic and procedural improvements to resolve these issues. By integrating empirical data analysis with a normative review, this research demonstrates that container damage management is not merely a matter of reducing repair costs, but a comprehensive management domain encompassing prevention, responsibility, documentation, and policy coordination. In particular, by combining visual validation of damage cases with analytical tracing of cost and liability, the study presents a new analytical framework in which regulatory standards, data evidence, and field experience reinforce one another. The findings of this study are expected to contribute to improving the operational efficiency and cost management of damaged containers, enhancing transparency in the distribution of responsibility, and promoting the standardization and strategic direction of container management practices within the shipping industry.
      Keywords : Container Damage, Container Repair, Container Damage Responsibility, C ontainer Transport Risk, Case-Based Analysis

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • ABSTRACT· vii
      • 제 1 장 서론 1
      • 제 1 절 연구의 배경 및 목적 1
      • 제 2 절 연구의 방법 및 구성 5
      • 제 3 절 선행연구 7
      • ABSTRACT· vii
      • 제 1 장 서론 1
      • 제 1 절 연구의 배경 및 목적 1
      • 제 2 절 연구의 방법 및 구성 5
      • 제 3 절 선행연구 7
      • 제 2 장 이론적 배경 10
      • 제 1 절 컨테이너 데미지에 대한 정의 10
      • 제 2 절 컨테이너 데미지 관련 협약과 규정 12
      • Ⅰ. CSC(Convention for Safe Containers) 12
      • Ⅱ. IICL(Institute of International Container Lessors) STANDARDS 13
      • Ⅲ. CTU(Code of Practice for Packing of Cargo Transport Units) 22
      • Ⅳ. 국내규정 23
      • 제 3 절 EIR(Equipment Interchange Receipt) 26
      • 제 3 장 해운선사의 데미지 관리 28
      • 제 1 절 데미지 컨테이너 수리 프로세스 28
      • 제 2 절 컨테이너 타입별 손상발생부위 31
      • 제 3 절 Cargo Worthy와 Wear & Tear 35
      • 제 4 장 실제 컨테이너 수리 데이터 분석 39
      • 제 1 절 공컨테이너 수리비율과 비용 39
      • Ⅰ. 운용비율 39
      • Ⅱ. 수리비율과 비용분석 40
      • Ⅲ. DOE(Damage Ocean Empty Reposition) 비율과 비용분석 45
      • 제 2 절 TPC(THIRD PARTY CLAIM) 51
      • Ⅰ. 단계에 따른 귀책 51
      • Ⅱ. 식별가능 시점과 귀책판별 수단 56
      • Ⅲ. 형태에 따른 귀책 63
      • Ⅳ. 청구의 근거 79
      • Ⅴ. TPC 청구 비율과 미수금 80
      • 제 3 절 컨테이너 데미지 관리상 주요 문제점 86
      • 제 5 장 컨테이너 데미지 관리를 위한 발전방안 89
      • 제 1 절 비용 최소화 방안 89
      • Ⅰ. LEASE & OFFHIRE의 활용 89
      • Ⅱ. DOE의 일괄적 활용 90
      • Ⅲ. 수리 데이터 확보 강화 91
      • 제 2 절 청구 최소화 방안 92
      • Ⅰ. 청구 발생 최소화 92
      • Ⅱ. 미수금 및 분쟁 최소화 95
      • 제 3 절 손상 최소화 방안 97
      • 제 6 장 결론 101
      • 제 1 절 연구의 요약 및 시사점 101
      • 제 2 절 연구의 요약 및 시사점 102
      • 참고문헌 104
      • 국문초록 107
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼