RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Al-Si 합금의 미세조직 인자가 잔류응력 형성 및 거동에 미치는 영향

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17396023

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Al–Si alloys are widely used for lightweight components in the automotive and aerospace industries because they can simultaneously provide excellent castability, high thermal conductivity, good corrosion resistance, and high specific strength. Owing to industrial requirements for complex-shaped parts, these components are primarily manufactured via casting. However, residual stresses form during processing due to non-uniform cooling rates between the surface and interior of the casting, which can cause warpage and distortion and thereby degrade fatigue life and structural integrity. Residual stress is the stress remaining in a material in the absence of external loads or temperature changes; therefore, accurate prediction and analysis are essential to ensure high reliability and quality. Recent prediction simulations based on solidification and heat-treatment behavior have been developed; however, their predictive accuracy remains limited because they do not sufficiently incorporate the effects of microscale residual stresses induced by the microstructure. Although prediction simulations based on solidification and heat-treatment behavior have recently been developed, their accuracy remains limited because they do not sufficiently account for microscale residual stresses induced by microstructure. Accordingly, this study sought to elucidate the principal factors influencing residual stress based on cast alloys with varying Si contents and actual cast products.
      Based on the maximum solubility limit of Si, cast alloys of Al–1.2Si, Al–1.6Si, Al–2.0Si, and Al–10Si were fabricated with hypo- and hyper-additions of Si. In the low-Si alloys (Al–1.2Si, Al–1.6Si, and Al–2.0Si), a network-like eutectic Si phase was observed, whereas in Al–10Si alloy, the eutectic Si phase appeared predominantly in acicular and short-rod morphologies. The solid solubility of Si in each alloy was estimated using Vegard’s law. Owing to the negligible solid solubility in the low-Si alloys (Al–1.2Si, Al–1.6Si, and Al–2.0Si), a low level of compressive residual stress was observed. In contrast, in the Al–10Si alloy, stress concentration sites were formed due to the acicular and short-rod eutectic Si morphology, and it was confirmed that the combined effects of stress concentration and lattice contraction associated with Si dissolution (up to 1.22 wt.%) contributed to the residual stress behavior.
      To examine the practical applicability of the trends observed in the binary alloys, a total of ten measurement locations were selected based on simulation results for an actual cast product, comprising five sites in the high-stress region and five sites in the low-stress region. At each location, the Si area fraction, Intermetallic compound (IMC) area fraction, and Si sphericity were selected as the primary microstructural factors, and the residual stress after polishing was used as the response variable in a design of experiments (DOE). As a result, Si sphericity was identified as a statistically significant factor at the 0.05 significance level (p ≤ 0.05).
      As a result of comprehensively analyzing microstructural factors that affect residual-stress behavior in alloys with under- and over-additions based on the maximum solid solubility of Si and in actual cast products, it was confirmed that, in Al–Si alloys, the Si phase is a dominant variable in the formation and distribution behavior of residual stress. In addition, by applying the DOE, it was demonstrated that it is effective in clearly distinguishing the significance of interdependent variables. Therefore, the results of this study could be used as basic data for establishing a residual-stress prediction simulation model that reflects microstructural factors at the microscopic scale.
      번역하기

      Al–Si alloys are widely used for lightweight components in the automotive and aerospace industries because they can simultaneously provide excellent castability, high thermal conductivity, good corrosion resistance, and high specific strength. Owing...

      Al–Si alloys are widely used for lightweight components in the automotive and aerospace industries because they can simultaneously provide excellent castability, high thermal conductivity, good corrosion resistance, and high specific strength. Owing to industrial requirements for complex-shaped parts, these components are primarily manufactured via casting. However, residual stresses form during processing due to non-uniform cooling rates between the surface and interior of the casting, which can cause warpage and distortion and thereby degrade fatigue life and structural integrity. Residual stress is the stress remaining in a material in the absence of external loads or temperature changes; therefore, accurate prediction and analysis are essential to ensure high reliability and quality. Recent prediction simulations based on solidification and heat-treatment behavior have been developed; however, their predictive accuracy remains limited because they do not sufficiently incorporate the effects of microscale residual stresses induced by the microstructure. Although prediction simulations based on solidification and heat-treatment behavior have recently been developed, their accuracy remains limited because they do not sufficiently account for microscale residual stresses induced by microstructure. Accordingly, this study sought to elucidate the principal factors influencing residual stress based on cast alloys with varying Si contents and actual cast products.
      Based on the maximum solubility limit of Si, cast alloys of Al–1.2Si, Al–1.6Si, Al–2.0Si, and Al–10Si were fabricated with hypo- and hyper-additions of Si. In the low-Si alloys (Al–1.2Si, Al–1.6Si, and Al–2.0Si), a network-like eutectic Si phase was observed, whereas in Al–10Si alloy, the eutectic Si phase appeared predominantly in acicular and short-rod morphologies. The solid solubility of Si in each alloy was estimated using Vegard’s law. Owing to the negligible solid solubility in the low-Si alloys (Al–1.2Si, Al–1.6Si, and Al–2.0Si), a low level of compressive residual stress was observed. In contrast, in the Al–10Si alloy, stress concentration sites were formed due to the acicular and short-rod eutectic Si morphology, and it was confirmed that the combined effects of stress concentration and lattice contraction associated with Si dissolution (up to 1.22 wt.%) contributed to the residual stress behavior.
      To examine the practical applicability of the trends observed in the binary alloys, a total of ten measurement locations were selected based on simulation results for an actual cast product, comprising five sites in the high-stress region and five sites in the low-stress region. At each location, the Si area fraction, Intermetallic compound (IMC) area fraction, and Si sphericity were selected as the primary microstructural factors, and the residual stress after polishing was used as the response variable in a design of experiments (DOE). As a result, Si sphericity was identified as a statistically significant factor at the 0.05 significance level (p ≤ 0.05).
      As a result of comprehensively analyzing microstructural factors that affect residual-stress behavior in alloys with under- and over-additions based on the maximum solid solubility of Si and in actual cast products, it was confirmed that, in Al–Si alloys, the Si phase is a dominant variable in the formation and distribution behavior of residual stress. In addition, by applying the DOE, it was demonstrated that it is effective in clearly distinguishing the significance of interdependent variables. Therefore, the results of this study could be used as basic data for establishing a residual-stress prediction simulation model that reflects microstructural factors at the microscopic scale.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • List of Tables ⅲ
      • List of Figures ⅳ
      • ABSTRACT ⅵ
      • 1. 서론 1
      • 1.1 연구 배경 1
      • List of Tables ⅲ
      • List of Figures ⅳ
      • ABSTRACT ⅵ
      • 1. 서론 1
      • 1.1 연구 배경 1
      • 1.2 연구 목적 5
      • 2. 이론적 배경 6
      • 2.1 잔류응력 6
      • 2.1.1 잔류응력의 정의 및 분류 6
      • 2.1.2 잔류응력의 응력 텐서 및 지표 8
      • 2.1.3 잔류응력 발생원인 및 영향 10
      • 2.1.4 잔류응력 측정 기술 14
      • 2.2 Al-Si 합금 18
      • 2.3 Al-Si 합금의 주조 방안 20
      • 3. 주조 합금의 잔류응력에 영향을 미치는 미세조직 인자 도출 22
      • 3.1 연구 목적 22
      • 3.2 실험 방법 23
      • 3.2.1 시험편 제작 23
      • 3.2.2 조성 분석 23
      • 3.2.3 전해연마 24
      • 3.2.4 고용도 측정 25
      • 3.2.5 잔류응력 측정 25
      • 3.2.6 미세조직 분석 26
      • 3.3 결과 및 고찰 27
      • 3.3.1 미세조직 분석 결과 27
      • 3.3.2 고용도와 잔류응력 간의 상관관계 분석 31
      • 3.3.3 고용도-잔류응력-미세조직 간의 상관관계 분석 33
      • 4. 실제 주조품의 잔류응력에 영향을 미치는 미세조직 인자 도출 34
      • 4.1 연구 목적 34
      • 4.2 실험 방법 35
      • 4.2.1 주조 공정 및 시뮬레이션 조건 35
      • 4.2.2 잔류응력 측정 35
      • 4.2.3 미세조직 분석 36
      • 4.2.4 2-수준 완전 요인 설계 36
      • 4.3 결과 및 고찰 38
      • 4.3.1 시뮬레이션 기반의 잔류응력 측정 구역 및 위치 선정 38
      • 4.3.2 잔류응력 측정 장비의 신뢰성 분석 39
      • 4.3.3 실측 값과 시뮬레이션 값의 정합성 분석 41
      • 4.3.4 실측 값과 시뮬레이션 값의 차이에 따른 미세조직 분석 43
      • 4.3.5 측정 위치에 따른 잔류응력 분포와 미세조직 분석 44
      • 4.3.6 실험계획법 (Design of Experiments, DOE) 분석 46
      • 4.3.7 미세조직 인자와 잔류응력 간의 상관관계 분석 52
      • 5. 결론 53
      • 참고문헌 55
      • 국문초록 71
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼