RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      중소기업 정책금융 지원에 따른 재무성과 및 생존효과 분석 = An Analysis of the Effects of Policy Finance on the Financial Performance and Survival of SMEs

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17393476

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study empirically examines how investment-based policy finance, as provided by the Korea SMEs and Startups Agency (KOSME), influences the financial performance and survival of SMEs. Firm-level data from 2020 to 2022 were utilized, and comparable groups were constructed using Propensity Score Matching (PSM). Subsequently, Difference-in-Differences (DID) analysis and survival analysis employing Kaplan–Meier estimation and Cox proportional hazards models were conducted.
      The findings indicate that investment support has more favorable effects on key stability indicators—particularly by reducing debt ratios and improving capital structure—compared to non-investment firms. While conventional loan support alleviated liquidity constraints in the short term, it tended to increase financial burdens over time. In contrast, investment-based support mitigated leverage pressure and contributed to the formation of a more sustainable financial structure. Although the effects on growth and profitability varied across years, investment support did not undermine performance and, in some cases, showed modest improvements. Survival analysis further revealed that firms receiving investment support exhibited a somewhat lower hazard of exit than non-investment firms, suggesting a positive contribution to long-term corporate sustainability.
      This study provides empirical evidence on the differentiated effects of policy finance instruments, thereby extending prior research that has predominantly focused on guarantee-centered programs. From a policy perspective, the findings emphasize the need to expand investment-oriented and hybrid financing schemes to strengthen the financial resilience and long-term competitiveness of SMEs.
      번역하기

      This study empirically examines how investment-based policy finance, as provided by the Korea SMEs and Startups Agency (KOSME), influences the financial performance and survival of SMEs. Firm-level data from 2020 to 2022 were utilized, and comparable ...

      This study empirically examines how investment-based policy finance, as provided by the Korea SMEs and Startups Agency (KOSME), influences the financial performance and survival of SMEs. Firm-level data from 2020 to 2022 were utilized, and comparable groups were constructed using Propensity Score Matching (PSM). Subsequently, Difference-in-Differences (DID) analysis and survival analysis employing Kaplan–Meier estimation and Cox proportional hazards models were conducted.
      The findings indicate that investment support has more favorable effects on key stability indicators—particularly by reducing debt ratios and improving capital structure—compared to non-investment firms. While conventional loan support alleviated liquidity constraints in the short term, it tended to increase financial burdens over time. In contrast, investment-based support mitigated leverage pressure and contributed to the formation of a more sustainable financial structure. Although the effects on growth and profitability varied across years, investment support did not undermine performance and, in some cases, showed modest improvements. Survival analysis further revealed that firms receiving investment support exhibited a somewhat lower hazard of exit than non-investment firms, suggesting a positive contribution to long-term corporate sustainability.
      This study provides empirical evidence on the differentiated effects of policy finance instruments, thereby extending prior research that has predominantly focused on guarantee-centered programs. From a policy perspective, the findings emphasize the need to expand investment-oriented and hybrid financing schemes to strengthen the financial resilience and long-term competitiveness of SMEs.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 제1장 서 론 1
      • 1.1 연구 배경 및 필요성 1
      • 1.2 선행연구 검토 5
      • 1.2.1 정책금융 효과성 연구 5
      • 1.2.2 정책금융과 기업 생존율 연구 9
      • 제1장 서 론 1
      • 1.1 연구 배경 및 필요성 1
      • 1.2 선행연구 검토 5
      • 1.2.1 정책금융 효과성 연구 5
      • 1.2.2 정책금융과 기업 생존율 연구 9
      • 1.2.3 투자지원 효과 연구 11
      • 1.3 연구 목적 15
      • 제2장 이론적 배경 17
      • 2.1 정책금융 17
      • 2.1.1 정책금융의 역할 17
      • 2.1.2 정책금융 수단 20
      • 2.1.3 정책금융 수행기관 및 지원체계 24
      • 2.2 중소벤처기업진흥공단 28
      • 2.2.1 정책자금 지원사업 28
      • 2.2.2 정책자금 투자지원 현황 33
      • 2.3 기업 재무성과 관련 이론 36
      • 2.4 기업 생존율 관련 이론 38
      • 제3장 연구 방법 40
      • 3.1 연구 모형 40
      • 3.2 연구 가설 42
      • 3.3 분석 방법 44
      • 3.3.1 성향점수매칭 44
      • 3.3.2 이중차이분석 45
      • 3.3.3 생존분석 48
      • 3.4 변수의 조작적 정의 49
      • 3.4.1 분석대상 49
      • 3.4.2 처리집단 및 통제집단 설정 50
      • 3.4.3 종속변수 50
      • 3.4.4 독립변수 51
      • 3.4.5 통제변수 52
      • 제4장 연구 결과 54
      • 4.1 표본의 기초통계 및 특성 54
      • 4.2 성향점수매칭 결과 57
      • 4.2.1 성향점수매칭 결과 분석 57
      • 4.2.2 성향점수매칭 질 평가 58
      • 4.2.3 프로빗 회귀분석을 통한 성향점수 추정 결과 61
      • 4.2.4 매칭 전후의 성향 점수 분포 62
      • 4.3 이중차이분석 결과 64
      • 4.3.1 성장성 지표 분석 65
      • 4.3.2 수익성 지표 분석 67
      • 4.3.3 안정성 지표 분석 70
      • 4.3.4 활동성 지표 분석 73
      • 4.3.5 연도별 분석 결과 74
      • 4.4 생존분석 결과 77
      • 4.4.1 카플란-메이어 생존 곡선 분석 77
      • 4.4.2 콕스 비례위험모형 결과 79
      • 제5장 결론 및 시사점 81
      • 5.1 연구 결론 81
      • 5.2 고찰 및 시사점 82
      • 5.3 연구의 한계 및 향후 과제 83
      • 참고문헌 85
      • Abstract 89
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼