RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      생성형 AI 의존을 형성하는 사회적 인식 조합 탐색 : 사회 표상 이론 기반 fsQCA 분석

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17393464

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study aims to examine users ' perceptions of reliance on generative AI and to explore which configurations of social representations shape such reliance. To this end, the study integrates Social Representation Theory with fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) to identify configurations of perceptions underlying cognitive and emotional reliance on generative AI.
      In Study 1, semi-structured interviews were conducted with users who had experience using generative AI. The interview data were analyzed through open coding and network analysis, which identified the core social representations constituting generative AI reliance.
      In Study 2, survey items were developed based on the core perceptions identified in Study 1, and a survey was administered to users who self-reported reliance on generative AI. The fsQCA results revealed that cognitive reliance is primarily formed around task convenience and promptness, with psychological comfort, trust, and emotional venting constituting three alternative configurations. In contrast, emotional reliance was found to be driven by emotional venting and psychological comfort as core conditions. Notably, a distinct configuration was identified in which emotional reliance emerged even at low levels of trust when functional efficiency was sufficiently perceived and psychological interactions, such as emotional venting, were present.
      Overall, these findings indicate that generative AI reliance shares a common foundation in task convenience, with cognitive reliance driven by function-oriented mechanisms and emotional reliance shaped by emotion-centered experiential mechanisms. Moreover, by adopting a mixed-methods approach that integrates Social Representation Theory with fsQCA, this study empirically demonstrates the multiple pathways and asymmetric causal structures underlying the reliance on generative AI.
      번역하기

      This study aims to examine users ' perceptions of reliance on generative AI and to explore which configurations of social representations shape such reliance. To this end, the study integrates Social Representation Theory with fuzzy-set Qualitative Co...

      This study aims to examine users ' perceptions of reliance on generative AI and to explore which configurations of social representations shape such reliance. To this end, the study integrates Social Representation Theory with fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) to identify configurations of perceptions underlying cognitive and emotional reliance on generative AI.
      In Study 1, semi-structured interviews were conducted with users who had experience using generative AI. The interview data were analyzed through open coding and network analysis, which identified the core social representations constituting generative AI reliance.
      In Study 2, survey items were developed based on the core perceptions identified in Study 1, and a survey was administered to users who self-reported reliance on generative AI. The fsQCA results revealed that cognitive reliance is primarily formed around task convenience and promptness, with psychological comfort, trust, and emotional venting constituting three alternative configurations. In contrast, emotional reliance was found to be driven by emotional venting and psychological comfort as core conditions. Notably, a distinct configuration was identified in which emotional reliance emerged even at low levels of trust when functional efficiency was sufficiently perceived and psychological interactions, such as emotional venting, were present.
      Overall, these findings indicate that generative AI reliance shares a common foundation in task convenience, with cognitive reliance driven by function-oriented mechanisms and emotional reliance shaped by emotion-centered experiential mechanisms. Moreover, by adopting a mixed-methods approach that integrates Social Representation Theory with fsQCA, this study empirically demonstrates the multiple pathways and asymmetric causal structures underlying the reliance on generative AI.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 제 1 장. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구 배경 및 필요성 1
      • 2. 연구 목적 및 질문 4
      • 3. 연구 방법 및 구성 6
      • 제 2 장. 이론적 배경 및 개념 10
      • 제 1 장. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구 배경 및 필요성 1
      • 2. 연구 목적 및 질문 4
      • 3. 연구 방법 및 구성 6
      • 제 2 장. 이론적 배경 및 개념 10
      • 1. 생성형 AI (Generative AI) 10
      • 1) 생성형 AI의 개념 10
      • 2) 생성형 AI의 기술적 특성 및 유형 13
      • 3) 생성형 AI의 인지적 정서적 특징 16
      • 2. 생성형 AI 의존 (Reliance on generative AI) 18
      • 1) 의존(Reliance) 개념 18
      • 2) 생성형 AI 의존 20
      • 3) 생성형 AI 의존 선행연구 23
      • 3. 사회 표상 이론(Social Representations Theory) 26
      • 1) 사회 표상 이론 개요 26
      • 2) 앵커링과 객체화(Anchoring & Objectification) 27
      • 3) 핵심-주변 구조(Core-Periphery Structure) 28
      • 4) 정보시스템 분야에서의 사회 표상 이론 29
      • 제 3 장. 연구 1 : 생성형 AI 의존에 대한 사회 표상 분석 31
      • 1. 연구 1의 개요 31
      • 2. 연구 1의 자료 수집 32
      • 1) 인터뷰 참여자 선정 및 기준 32
      • 2) 인터뷰 질문 구성 및 진행 절차 32
      • 3. 연구 1의 분석 방법 34
      • 1) 개방형 코딩을 통한 주제어 도출 34
      • 2) 주제어 공동출현 네트워크 구축 35
      • 3) 중심성 지표 계산 및 구조화 36
      • 4. 연구 1의 결과 37
      • 제 4 장. 연구 2 : FsQCA 기반 생성형 AI 의존 조합 탐색 38
      • 1. 연구 2의 개요 38
      • 2. 연구 2의 자료 수집 39
      • 3. 연구 2의 분석 방법 45
      • 1) FsQCA 개요 및 특성 45
      • 2) 데이터 분석 절차 46
      • 4. 연구 2의 결과 51
      • 1) 인지적 의존 조합 51
      • 2) 정서적 의존 조합 53
      • 3) 연구 2 결과 55
      • 제 5 장. 결론 및 시사점 56
      • 1. 연구의 결과 논의 56
      • 2. 연구의 시사점 60
      • 1) 이론적 시사점 60
      • 2) 실무적 시사점 61
      • 3. 연구의 한계 및 향후 연구 방향 62
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼