RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    한국의료패널자료 성향점수매칭 후 민간의료보험이 의료이용에 미치는 영향 = The Impact of Private Health Insurance on Healthcare Utilization : A Propensity Score Matching Analysis of Korea Health Panel Survey 2019-2023

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17393347

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study analyzed the impact of private health insurance on healthcare utilization
    and medical expenditure using the Korea Health Panel Survey Wave 2 (2019-2023).
    Through propensity score matching for age, sex, education, household income, and
    household size, we examined 1,251 individuals (417 per group): those with Indemnity
    Health Insurance group, Fixed Amount Health Insurance group, and the Person without
    PRIVETE HEALTH insurance group.
    Results showed that private insurance differentially affects healthcare services
    based on coverage status and out-of-pocket payment levels. Indemnity insurance
    holders utilized non-covered services like manual therapy 2-3 times more than the
    uninsured (p<0.001). Significant differences were also observed in high-cost services
    including MRI/CT and dental implants (p=0.022, p=0.017), while no differences existed
    in low-cost basic services like vaccinations.
    Private insurance demonstrated both positive and negative effects. Positive effects
    included 15-18 percentage points higher screening participation rates (p<0.001) and
    2.6 times higher polyp detection rates (16.8% vs 6.5%, p<0.001), indicating benefits
    in preventive care and early disease detection. Treatment rates after disease
    detection showed no differences (p=0.532). Negative effects included potential
    overutilization of manual and physical therapy. Indemnity insurance holders spent
    1.05 million won more in out-of-pocket costs and 430,000 won more in non-covered
    expenses over five years (p<0.001, p=0.012), suggesting moral hazard.
    Policy implications include: strengthening regulations on non-covered services to
    curb moral hazard, continuously enhancing National Health Insurance coverage,
    promoting screening among vulnerable populations to prevent health inequalities, and
    implementing differential regulatory strategies to maximize benefits while minimizing
    adverse effects.
    This study provides rigorous analysis of private insurance effects through
    propensity score matching and five-year data integration, offering balanced
    evaluation of both benefits and drawbacks. The findings provide empirical evidence
    for healthcare system reforms aimed at strengthening National Health Insurance
    coverage and regulating Private Health Hnsurance.
    Keywords: Private Health Insurance, Indemnity Health Insurance, Fixed Amount Health
    Insurance, Healthcare utilization, Medical expenditure, Propensity score matching,
    Korea Health Panel Survey
    번역하기

    This study analyzed the impact of private health insurance on healthcare utilization and medical expenditure using the Korea Health Panel Survey Wave 2 (2019-2023). Through propensity score matching for age, sex, education, household income, and ho...

    This study analyzed the impact of private health insurance on healthcare utilization
    and medical expenditure using the Korea Health Panel Survey Wave 2 (2019-2023).
    Through propensity score matching for age, sex, education, household income, and
    household size, we examined 1,251 individuals (417 per group): those with Indemnity
    Health Insurance group, Fixed Amount Health Insurance group, and the Person without
    PRIVETE HEALTH insurance group.
    Results showed that private insurance differentially affects healthcare services
    based on coverage status and out-of-pocket payment levels. Indemnity insurance
    holders utilized non-covered services like manual therapy 2-3 times more than the
    uninsured (p<0.001). Significant differences were also observed in high-cost services
    including MRI/CT and dental implants (p=0.022, p=0.017), while no differences existed
    in low-cost basic services like vaccinations.
    Private insurance demonstrated both positive and negative effects. Positive effects
    included 15-18 percentage points higher screening participation rates (p<0.001) and
    2.6 times higher polyp detection rates (16.8% vs 6.5%, p<0.001), indicating benefits
    in preventive care and early disease detection. Treatment rates after disease
    detection showed no differences (p=0.532). Negative effects included potential
    overutilization of manual and physical therapy. Indemnity insurance holders spent
    1.05 million won more in out-of-pocket costs and 430,000 won more in non-covered
    expenses over five years (p<0.001, p=0.012), suggesting moral hazard.
    Policy implications include: strengthening regulations on non-covered services to
    curb moral hazard, continuously enhancing National Health Insurance coverage,
    promoting screening among vulnerable populations to prevent health inequalities, and
    implementing differential regulatory strategies to maximize benefits while minimizing
    adverse effects.
    This study provides rigorous analysis of private insurance effects through
    propensity score matching and five-year data integration, offering balanced
    evaluation of both benefits and drawbacks. The findings provide empirical evidence
    for healthcare system reforms aimed at strengthening National Health Insurance
    coverage and regulating Private Health Hnsurance.
    Keywords: Private Health Insurance, Indemnity Health Insurance, Fixed Amount Health
    Insurance, Healthcare utilization, Medical expenditure, Propensity score matching,
    Korea Health Panel Survey

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구배경 및 필요성 1
    • 2. 연구목적 7
    • Ⅱ. 연구대상 및 방법 8
    • 1. 연구 대상 8
    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구배경 및 필요성 1
    • 2. 연구목적 7
    • Ⅱ. 연구대상 및 방법 8
    • 1. 연구 대상 8
    • 2. 변수 정의 14
    • 3. 분석방법 19
    • Ⅲ. 연구결과 21
    • 1. 성향점수매칭에 의한 연구 대상자의 특성 21
    • 1.1 성향점수매칭 전-후 연구 대상자의 일반적 특성 21
    • 1.2 성향점수매칭 후 균형성 평가 24
    • 1.3 성향점수 매칭 후 대상자의 의료 이용의 필요 요인 비교 28
    • 2. 민간의료보험 가입형태에 따른 의료서비스 이용 32
    • 2.1 응급입원외래 의료서비스 이용 32
    • 2.2 의과치과한방 외래 의료서비스 이용 34
    • 2.3 의과 외래진료 이용 양상 및 집단 간 차이 36
    • 2.4 치과 외래진료 이용 양상 및 집단 간 차이 39
    • 2.5 한방 외래진료 이용 양상 및 집단 간 차이 43
    • 3. 민간의료보험 가입형태에 따른 건강검진 이용 46
    • 3.1 건강검진 이용 현황 및 집단 간 차이 46
    • 3.2 건강검진 질병발견 및 집단 간 차이 48
    • 4. 민간의료보험 가입형태에 따른 의료비 지출 추정 51
    • 4.1 민간보험 가입에 따른 외래 의료비 지출 추정 51
    • 4.2 민간보험 가입에 따른 입원 의료비 지출 추정 53
    • Ⅳ. 고찰 55
    • Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론 65
    • 참고문헌 67
    • 영문초록 72
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼