This study analyzed the impact of private health insurance on healthcare utilization
and medical expenditure using the Korea Health Panel Survey Wave 2 (2019-2023).
Through propensity score matching for age, sex, education, household income, and
ho...
This study analyzed the impact of private health insurance on healthcare utilization
and medical expenditure using the Korea Health Panel Survey Wave 2 (2019-2023).
Through propensity score matching for age, sex, education, household income, and
household size, we examined 1,251 individuals (417 per group): those with Indemnity
Health Insurance group, Fixed Amount Health Insurance group, and the Person without
PRIVETE HEALTH insurance group.
Results showed that private insurance differentially affects healthcare services
based on coverage status and out-of-pocket payment levels. Indemnity insurance
holders utilized non-covered services like manual therapy 2-3 times more than the
uninsured (p<0.001). Significant differences were also observed in high-cost services
including MRI/CT and dental implants (p=0.022, p=0.017), while no differences existed
in low-cost basic services like vaccinations.
Private insurance demonstrated both positive and negative effects. Positive effects
included 15-18 percentage points higher screening participation rates (p<0.001) and
2.6 times higher polyp detection rates (16.8% vs 6.5%, p<0.001), indicating benefits
in preventive care and early disease detection. Treatment rates after disease
detection showed no differences (p=0.532). Negative effects included potential
overutilization of manual and physical therapy. Indemnity insurance holders spent
1.05 million won more in out-of-pocket costs and 430,000 won more in non-covered
expenses over five years (p<0.001, p=0.012), suggesting moral hazard.
Policy implications include: strengthening regulations on non-covered services to
curb moral hazard, continuously enhancing National Health Insurance coverage,
promoting screening among vulnerable populations to prevent health inequalities, and
implementing differential regulatory strategies to maximize benefits while minimizing
adverse effects.
This study provides rigorous analysis of private insurance effects through
propensity score matching and five-year data integration, offering balanced
evaluation of both benefits and drawbacks. The findings provide empirical evidence
for healthcare system reforms aimed at strengthening National Health Insurance
coverage and regulating Private Health Hnsurance.
Keywords: Private Health Insurance, Indemnity Health Insurance, Fixed Amount Health
Insurance, Healthcare utilization, Medical expenditure, Propensity score matching,
Korea Health Panel Survey