This study investigates the effectiveness of design thinking–based participatory public design within the framework of Korea’s “Culture City” project. Since the enactment of the Regional Culture Promotion Act in 2014, the Ministry of Culture, ...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17393128
대구 : 경북대학교 대학원, 2026
2026
한국어
658.401 판사항(23)
대구
Design Thinking?Based Participatory Public Design in Culture City Projects : Empirical Implications for Urban Regeneration
iv, 44 p. ; 26 cm
지도교수: 정경철
참고문헌 수록
I804:22001-000000112097
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This study investigates the effectiveness of design thinking–based participatory public design within the framework of Korea’s “Culture City” project. Since the enactment of the Regional Culture Promotion Act in 2014, the Ministry of Culture, ...
This study investigates the effectiveness of design thinking–based participatory public design within the framework of Korea’s “Culture City” project. Since the enactment of the Regional Culture Promotion Act in 2014, the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism has designated 24 municipalities as Culture Cities to revitalize local culture and promote sustainable urban regeneration. While previous evaluations have largely focused on quantitative achievements such as cultural infrastructure expansion, less attention has been paid to qualitative outcomes—particularly the role of citizen participation and creative methodologies in project success.
The research adopts a qualitative case study approach, focusing on Suseong-gu, Daegu, which was officially designated as a Culture City in 2025 under the vision of transforming the entire district into an “Art Museum City.” Drawing upon project documents, government reports, media articles, and supplementary interviews, the study examines how design thinking was applied through resident workshops, co-creation programs, and cultural experiments. Comparative cases from Yeongdeungpo-gu (Seoul), Yeongdo-gu (Busan), and Chuncheon-si (Gangwon Province) were also analyzed to identify similarities and differences in outcomes.
Five key evaluation indicators were established: (1) resident satisfaction, (2) participation rate and continuity, (3) cultural performance, (4) community impact, and (5) policy reflection and sustainability. The analysis demonstrates that design thinking–oriented approaches led to higher levels of resident engagement, stronger community networks, and innovative cultural outputs compared to conventional top-down models. In particular, Suseong-gu and Yeongdeungpo-gu showed consistently positive results due to systematic governance structures and participatory design processes, whereas Yeongdo-gu revealed limitations in long-term sustainability.
The findings highlight that integrating design thinking into participatory public design enhances both tangible and intangible outcomes of the Culture City initiative. This approach not only fosters creative solutions tailored to local needs but also strengthens social capital, cultural identity, and policy continuity. The study concludes by suggesting that future cultural policies in Korea should institutionalize participatory design thinking practices to ensure sustainable and citizen-centered urban regeneration.
Keywords: Culture City, participatory public design, design thinking, urban regeneration, community engagement, Suseong-gu
목차 (Table of Contents)