RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      대학 일본어 교재의 어휘 연구 = A Study on Vocabulary in University-Level Japanese Textbooks

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17393099

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study scrutinizes distinct characteristics and vocabulary compositions of
      university-level Japanese textbooks tapped into education courses in Korea. While
      secondary education curricula in Korea offer a standardized vocabulary list and
      structured curriculum regarding Japanese language education, university-level Japanese
      education lacks such consistency, resulting in significant variations in vocabulary
      quantity, parts of speech, difficulty level, commonality among textbooks.
      To tackle these inconsistencies, this research analyzes five university-level Japanese
      textbooks fostered and utilized by individual universities, focusing on vocabulary quantity,
      parts of speech, lexical origin (word type), and JLPT levels. In addition to that, four high
      school Japanese textbooks approved under the 2022 revised curriculum are used as a
      control group for comparison.
      The findings reveal notable disparities in vocabulary quantity and difficulty across university textbooks, with some textbooks containing more than five times the number of vocabulary items found in high school textbooks. Moreover, the degree of vocabulary overlap (commonality) between university textbooks is relatively low. These inconsistencies may hinder the efficiency of vocabulary instruction and pose challenges for learners, particularly those at the beginner level.
      Based on these outcomes, the study puts emphasis on the need for standardization in
      university-level Japanese vocabulary education and proposes suggestions for future
      textbook enhancement. These include establishing a foundational vocabulary list,
      improving the alignment between vocabulary and learners' levels and enhancing the
      coherence of vocabulary across university-level materials. This research contributes to
      the improvement of vocabulary education in university Japanese curricula and offers a
      foundation for more systematic textbook development.
      번역하기

      This study scrutinizes distinct characteristics and vocabulary compositions of university-level Japanese textbooks tapped into education courses in Korea. While secondary education curricula in Korea offer a standardized vocabulary list and structu...

      This study scrutinizes distinct characteristics and vocabulary compositions of
      university-level Japanese textbooks tapped into education courses in Korea. While
      secondary education curricula in Korea offer a standardized vocabulary list and
      structured curriculum regarding Japanese language education, university-level Japanese
      education lacks such consistency, resulting in significant variations in vocabulary
      quantity, parts of speech, difficulty level, commonality among textbooks.
      To tackle these inconsistencies, this research analyzes five university-level Japanese
      textbooks fostered and utilized by individual universities, focusing on vocabulary quantity,
      parts of speech, lexical origin (word type), and JLPT levels. In addition to that, four high
      school Japanese textbooks approved under the 2022 revised curriculum are used as a
      control group for comparison.
      The findings reveal notable disparities in vocabulary quantity and difficulty across university textbooks, with some textbooks containing more than five times the number of vocabulary items found in high school textbooks. Moreover, the degree of vocabulary overlap (commonality) between university textbooks is relatively low. These inconsistencies may hinder the efficiency of vocabulary instruction and pose challenges for learners, particularly those at the beginner level.
      Based on these outcomes, the study puts emphasis on the need for standardization in
      university-level Japanese vocabulary education and proposes suggestions for future
      textbook enhancement. These include establishing a foundational vocabulary list,
      improving the alignment between vocabulary and learners' levels and enhancing the
      coherence of vocabulary across university-level materials. This research contributes to
      the improvement of vocabulary education in university Japanese curricula and offers a
      foundation for more systematic textbook development.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 제 1 장 서론 1
      • 1.1 연구 배경 1
      • 1.2 선행연구 검토 2
      • 1.3 연구 개요 7
      • 1.3.1 연구 대상의 선정 8
      • 제 1 장 서론 1
      • 1.1 연구 배경 1
      • 1.2 선행연구 검토 2
      • 1.3 연구 개요 7
      • 1.3.1 연구 대상의 선정 8
      • 1.3.2 연구 방법 14
      • 제 2 장 대학 일본어 교재 어휘 성격 분석 17
      • 2.1 어휘량 17
      • 2.1.1 개별어수, 전체어수 및 어휘의 평균 사용 빈도 17
      • 2.1.2 단원별 평균 어휘 수 21
      • 2.2 품사에 대한 고찰 25
      • 2.2.1 고등학교 및 대학 일본어 교재의 품사별 현황 25
      • 2.2.2 일본 국어사전과의 품사 특징 비교 30
      • 2.3 대학 일본어 교재 어휘와 JLPT 의 관련성 32
      • 2.3.1 고등학교 및 대학 일본어 교재의 JLPT 레벨별 어휘 현황 33
      • 2.3.2 중, 고등학교 교재와 대학 일본어 교재의 연계성 검토 37
      • 2.4 어종에 대한 고찰 39
      • 2.4.1 대학 일본어 교재의 어종 분포 39
      • 2.4.2 일본 국어사전과의 어종 특징 비교 41
      • 제 3 장 대학 일본어 교재 어휘 공통도에 대한 고찰 43
      • 3.1 교재별 어휘의 공통도 44
      • 3.2 품사별 어휘의 공통도 46
      • 3.3 JLPT 레벨별 어휘의 공통도 51
      • 3.4 어종별 어휘의 공통도 53
      • 제 4 장 결론 56
      • 참고문헌 59
      • 부록 65
      • 대학 일본어 교재 수록 어휘표 65
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼