RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      기후변화 대응형 교통 허브 구축을 위한 메디앙스 기반 통합 협업 프로세스에 관한 연구 - GIS를 활용한 해외 복합철도역사 조성 사례를 중심으로 - = A Study on the Mediance-based Integrated Collaborative Process for Climate Change Responsive Transport-Hub - Focusing on International Cases of Complex Railway Station using GIS -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17393076

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study aims to redefine railway stations as climate-resilient urban hubs amidst deepening climate crises and increasing urban infrastructure complexity, and to establish the structure of a GIS and parametric design interlinked architectural collaborative process to realize this goal. Through an analysis of major complex station megaprojects—including Stuttgart Main Station(SMS) in Germany, the Salesforce Transit Center(STC) in the San Francisco, and West Kowloon Station(WKS) in Hong Kong the research elucidates how climate-based data structures the collaboration and is transformed into design variables within the architectural and urban planning decision-making process. The research methodology proceeded in the following sequence: establishment of a climate-based analytical framework: Integration of legal/institutional, environmental, and urban infrastructure factors. analysis of phased collaborative procedures: examination of GIS data and the step-by-step collaboration based on urban and climate characteristics. Comparative analysis of unique architectural structural systems: comparison of the distinct structural systems(column-centric, facade-centric, and roof-centric structures) inherent to each case. Systematization of the parametric design variable derivation process: Integration of the preceding steps into a structured design process. The research yielded three core findings: First, preemptive regulatory frameworks based on climate data are essential. The study confirmed that establishing preemptive legal and institutional frameworks based on climate, terrain, and environmental data is a prerequisite for advancing megaprojects. Common structural patterns emerged across the cases, all demonstrating a "climate-preemptive regulatory setting": the protection of wind corridors in SMS, the enhancement of seismic and flood standards in STC, and the design for inundation and typhoon durability in WKS. Second, GIS based analysis functions as a climate specific diagnostic system. GIS-based urban environmental analysis functions as a problem-diagnosis system specialized for the climate and topography of each case, serving as a reference point for consensus and strategic adjustment among collaborating stakeholders. The differences in structural backgrounds—basin-type(SMS), hilly-type(STC), and coastal lowland-type(WKS)—determined distinct design variables. Third, climate analysis results are integrated into structural systems and transformed via parametric design. The climate-based analysis results are concretized into integrated structural systems(represented by the column–facade–roof elements) specific to each hub. The process of their actual transformation into architectural design via parametric design was confirmed, proving that climate-responsive strategies involve a collaborative and structured design process. Based on this analysis, the study proposes a standard structure for a GIS and parametric design interlinked collaborative process for the creation of climate-resilient urban hubs. This is a multidisciplinary structure that integrates law, data, environment, design, and operation, providing a practical framework applicable to the planning and design phases of future major railway station and urban infrastructure developments. The following areas are suggested for future refinement and supplementation, which are essential for expanding the proposed collaborative process to various domestic and international urban infrastructure projects: Refinement of institutional and spatial data for domestic application. Strengthening the Reliability of parametric design interpretation models. Dynamic process research to respond to changes in collaborating stakeholders, given the nature of long-term urban projects. Development of a real-time urban data based feedback structure for the operational phase.
      The research findings are threefold:
      1) SMS, due to its branched locational characteristics, faced complex urban environmental issues such as flooding from heavy rain, rising groundwater levels, and atmospheric stagnation. Development was driven by the goal of restructuring the city toward a carbon-neutral structure. The strategy involved relocating the above-ground railway tracks underground to secure new urban space and converting the above-ground area into a green axis, reconfiguring the ‘Urban Void’ into an ecological space. The integrated mediating structure of SMS was planned as a column-centered structure, linking the underground space with the urban environment. Natural ventilation for the underground concourse and platforms was integrated into the column interiors, ensuring air circulation and connecting with the upper green axis to create a wind path.
      2) STC is a central axis of complex transport and urban development, built as part of the Transbay program. Located on unstable ground traversed by the San Andreas Fault, STC faced complex natural disaster risks like earthquakes and the urban heat island effect. Development was initiated as an ecological transition project aimed at building a climate-responsive urban infrastructure and achieving carbon neutrality. STC was defined as an 'Urban Interface' where complex urban functions intersect, integrating transport, ecology, and mixed-use functions into a single adaptive system. The integrated mediating structure of STC was planned as an envelope-centered structure, expanding into an Ecological Buffer that manages natural lighting, ventilation, indoor temperature, and energy circulation. A complex louver system on the envelope, linked to real-time climate data, controls solar radiation, while integrated natural ventilation cells automatically regulate indoor air flow. The 22,000㎡ rooftop park mitigates the urban heat island effect and forms an ecological buffer, connecting the upper green axis with the lower transportation network. This structure integrated movement, stay, and circulation within the city into a single ‘data-physical complex system’.
      3) WKS and its surrounding area exhibit climatic characteristics such as typhoons, heavy rain, flooding, sea-level rise, and the heat island effect. Accordingly, development was pursued with the goal of carbon neutrality centered on climate-responsive ecological infrastructure. The integrated mediating structure of WKS was planned as a roof-centered structure, implementing the concept of an ‘Urban Canopy’ that links the curved roof to the city’s ecological axis. The roof, supported by a V-truss structure, was developed as a rooftop park, connecting with the central green axis of the WKCD to establish an urban green network. This spatial structure mitigates strong winds during typhoons through its curved form and prevents flooding via an internal roof drainage system, also performing a regulating function to reduce summer temperatures. The concourse and transfer spaces applied façade panels for natural light influx and ventilation systems.
      The process of their actual transformation into architectural design via parametric design was confirmed, proving that climate-responsive strategies involve a collaborative and structured design process. Based on this analysis, the study proposes a standard structure for a GIS and parametric Design interlinked collaborative process for the creation of climate-resilient urban hubs. This is a multidisciplinary structure that integrates law, data, environment, design, and operation, providing a practical framework applicable to the planning and design phases of future major railway station and urban infrastructure developments. The following areas are suggested for future refinement and supplementation, which are essential for expanding the proposed collaborative process to various domestic and international urban infrastructure projects: Refinement of Institutional and Spatial Data for domestic application. Strengthening the Reliability of parametric design interpretation models. Dynamic process research to respond to changes in collaborating stakeholders, given the nature of long-term urban projects. Development of a real-time urban data based feedback structure for the operational phase.
      번역하기

      This study aims to redefine railway stations as climate-resilient urban hubs amidst deepening climate crises and increasing urban infrastructure complexity, and to establish the structure of a GIS and parametric design interlinked architectural collab...

      This study aims to redefine railway stations as climate-resilient urban hubs amidst deepening climate crises and increasing urban infrastructure complexity, and to establish the structure of a GIS and parametric design interlinked architectural collaborative process to realize this goal. Through an analysis of major complex station megaprojects—including Stuttgart Main Station(SMS) in Germany, the Salesforce Transit Center(STC) in the San Francisco, and West Kowloon Station(WKS) in Hong Kong the research elucidates how climate-based data structures the collaboration and is transformed into design variables within the architectural and urban planning decision-making process. The research methodology proceeded in the following sequence: establishment of a climate-based analytical framework: Integration of legal/institutional, environmental, and urban infrastructure factors. analysis of phased collaborative procedures: examination of GIS data and the step-by-step collaboration based on urban and climate characteristics. Comparative analysis of unique architectural structural systems: comparison of the distinct structural systems(column-centric, facade-centric, and roof-centric structures) inherent to each case. Systematization of the parametric design variable derivation process: Integration of the preceding steps into a structured design process. The research yielded three core findings: First, preemptive regulatory frameworks based on climate data are essential. The study confirmed that establishing preemptive legal and institutional frameworks based on climate, terrain, and environmental data is a prerequisite for advancing megaprojects. Common structural patterns emerged across the cases, all demonstrating a "climate-preemptive regulatory setting": the protection of wind corridors in SMS, the enhancement of seismic and flood standards in STC, and the design for inundation and typhoon durability in WKS. Second, GIS based analysis functions as a climate specific diagnostic system. GIS-based urban environmental analysis functions as a problem-diagnosis system specialized for the climate and topography of each case, serving as a reference point for consensus and strategic adjustment among collaborating stakeholders. The differences in structural backgrounds—basin-type(SMS), hilly-type(STC), and coastal lowland-type(WKS)—determined distinct design variables. Third, climate analysis results are integrated into structural systems and transformed via parametric design. The climate-based analysis results are concretized into integrated structural systems(represented by the column–facade–roof elements) specific to each hub. The process of their actual transformation into architectural design via parametric design was confirmed, proving that climate-responsive strategies involve a collaborative and structured design process. Based on this analysis, the study proposes a standard structure for a GIS and parametric design interlinked collaborative process for the creation of climate-resilient urban hubs. This is a multidisciplinary structure that integrates law, data, environment, design, and operation, providing a practical framework applicable to the planning and design phases of future major railway station and urban infrastructure developments. The following areas are suggested for future refinement and supplementation, which are essential for expanding the proposed collaborative process to various domestic and international urban infrastructure projects: Refinement of institutional and spatial data for domestic application. Strengthening the Reliability of parametric design interpretation models. Dynamic process research to respond to changes in collaborating stakeholders, given the nature of long-term urban projects. Development of a real-time urban data based feedback structure for the operational phase.
      The research findings are threefold:
      1) SMS, due to its branched locational characteristics, faced complex urban environmental issues such as flooding from heavy rain, rising groundwater levels, and atmospheric stagnation. Development was driven by the goal of restructuring the city toward a carbon-neutral structure. The strategy involved relocating the above-ground railway tracks underground to secure new urban space and converting the above-ground area into a green axis, reconfiguring the ‘Urban Void’ into an ecological space. The integrated mediating structure of SMS was planned as a column-centered structure, linking the underground space with the urban environment. Natural ventilation for the underground concourse and platforms was integrated into the column interiors, ensuring air circulation and connecting with the upper green axis to create a wind path.
      2) STC is a central axis of complex transport and urban development, built as part of the Transbay program. Located on unstable ground traversed by the San Andreas Fault, STC faced complex natural disaster risks like earthquakes and the urban heat island effect. Development was initiated as an ecological transition project aimed at building a climate-responsive urban infrastructure and achieving carbon neutrality. STC was defined as an 'Urban Interface' where complex urban functions intersect, integrating transport, ecology, and mixed-use functions into a single adaptive system. The integrated mediating structure of STC was planned as an envelope-centered structure, expanding into an Ecological Buffer that manages natural lighting, ventilation, indoor temperature, and energy circulation. A complex louver system on the envelope, linked to real-time climate data, controls solar radiation, while integrated natural ventilation cells automatically regulate indoor air flow. The 22,000㎡ rooftop park mitigates the urban heat island effect and forms an ecological buffer, connecting the upper green axis with the lower transportation network. This structure integrated movement, stay, and circulation within the city into a single ‘data-physical complex system’.
      3) WKS and its surrounding area exhibit climatic characteristics such as typhoons, heavy rain, flooding, sea-level rise, and the heat island effect. Accordingly, development was pursued with the goal of carbon neutrality centered on climate-responsive ecological infrastructure. The integrated mediating structure of WKS was planned as a roof-centered structure, implementing the concept of an ‘Urban Canopy’ that links the curved roof to the city’s ecological axis. The roof, supported by a V-truss structure, was developed as a rooftop park, connecting with the central green axis of the WKCD to establish an urban green network. This spatial structure mitigates strong winds during typhoons through its curved form and prevents flooding via an internal roof drainage system, also performing a regulating function to reduce summer temperatures. The concourse and transfer spaces applied façade panels for natural light influx and ventilation systems.
      The process of their actual transformation into architectural design via parametric design was confirmed, proving that climate-responsive strategies involve a collaborative and structured design process. Based on this analysis, the study proposes a standard structure for a GIS and parametric Design interlinked collaborative process for the creation of climate-resilient urban hubs. This is a multidisciplinary structure that integrates law, data, environment, design, and operation, providing a practical framework applicable to the planning and design phases of future major railway station and urban infrastructure developments. The following areas are suggested for future refinement and supplementation, which are essential for expanding the proposed collaborative process to various domestic and international urban infrastructure projects: Refinement of Institutional and Spatial Data for domestic application. Strengthening the Reliability of parametric design interpretation models. Dynamic process research to respond to changes in collaborating stakeholders, given the nature of long-term urban projects. Development of a real-time urban data based feedback structure for the operational phase.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 제 1 장 서 론
      • 1.1 연구의 배경 및 목적 005
      • 1.2 연구의 범위 및 방법 012
      • 1.2.1 연구의 범위 012
      • 1.2.2 연구의 방법 016
      • 제 1 장 서 론
      • 1.1 연구의 배경 및 목적 005
      • 1.2 연구의 범위 및 방법 012
      • 1.2.1 연구의 범위 012
      • 1.2.2 연구의 방법 016
      • 1.3 선행연구 검토 및 차별성 020
      • 1.3.1 선행연구 검토 020
      • 1.3.2 연구의 차별성 025
      • 제 2 장 메디앙스 기반 철도역 중심 교통 허브 구조와 협업 프로세스의 이론적 틀 036
      • 2.1 철도역 중심 허브의 복잡계적 구조와 도시적 맥락 037
      • 2.1.1 기후변화 대응 및 탄소 중립 전환을 위한 허브 전략의 확장성 037
      • 2.1.2 철도역 중심 복잡계 허브의 매개적 역할 042
      • 2.1.3 도시적 맥락으로서의 교통 허브와 네트워크 구조 048
      • 2.2 메디앙스 기반 허브의 매개 구조와 투사적 상관관계 054
      • 2.2.1 메디앙스의 개념 및 정의 054
      • 2.2.2 교통 허브를 중심으로 작동하는 매개 구조 해석 058
      • 2.3 철도역 중심 통합 협업 프로세스의 기술적 전환 069
      • 2.3.1 과거 협업 방식의 구조적 한계 069
      • 2.3.2 기존 철도 건축 협업 프로세스의 문제점 073
      • 2.3.3 GIS 데이터 기반 통합 협업 프로세스 분석의 틀 정립 074
      • 제 3 장 해외 허브 사례의 기후 대응형 통합 협업 프로세스 분석 079
      • 3.1 메디앙스 구조 기반 교통 허브 전략의 분석 틀과 절차 080
      • 3.2 독일 슈투트가르트 중앙역(SMS)의 GIS 데이터 기반 통합 협업 프로세스 082
      • 3.2.1 SMS의 법적 조항 선제정 단계: 대기 정체ㆍ열섬 현상 대응 082
      • 3.2.2 SMS의 도시환경 분석 및 문제 진단 단계: 분지형 기후 087
      • 3.2.3 SMS의 허브 전략 통합 및 계획 반영 단계: 기둥 중심 구조 099
      • 3.3 미국 세일즈포스 트랜싯 센터(STC)의 GIS 데이터 기반 통합 협업 프로세스 120
      • 3.3.1 STC의 법적 조항 선제정 단계: 지진ㆍ홍수 대응 120
      • 3.3.2 STC의 도시환경 분석 및 문제 진단 단계: 구릉지형 기후 124
      • 3.3.3 STC의 허브 전략 통합 및 계획 반영 단계: 외피 중심 구조 140
      • 3.4 홍콩 서구룡역(WKS)의 GIS 데이터 기반 통합 협업 프로세스 161
      • 3.4.1 WKS의 법적 조항 선제정 단계: 태풍ㆍ침수 대응 161
      • 3.4.2 WKS의 도시환경 분석 및 문제 진단 단계: 해안지형 기후 165
      • 3.4.3 WKS의 허브 전략 통합 및 계획 반영 단계: 지붕 중심 구조 183
      • 3.5 사례별 허브 조성 전략간 통합 비교 214
      • 제 4 장 기후 대응형 GIS 데이터 기반 통합 협업 프로세스 구축 218
      • 4.1 허브 구축 전략에 따른 사례별 통합 매개변수 추출 및 적용 219
      • 4.1.1 SMS의 통합 매개변수 추출 및 적용: 라이트 아이 기둥 구조 220
      • 4.1.2 STC의 통합 매개변수 추출 및 적용: 펜로즈 패턴 외피 구조 224
      • 4.1.3 WKS의 통합 매개변수 추출 및 적용: 메가 트러스 지붕 구조 228
      • 4.2 기후 대응형 프로그램 연동 기반 협업 프로세스 유형화 234
      • 4.2.1 SMS의 생태 환경 분석 주도형 협업 프로세스 236
      • 4.2.2 STC의 다중 기준 통합형 협업 프로세스 238
      • 4.2.3 WKS의 형태 결정 하중 제어형 협업 프로세스 240
      • 4.3 기후 대응형 통합 협업 프로세스의 일반화된 구조 도출 247
      • 제 5 장 결 론 250
      • 5.1 연구의 의의 및 시사점 251
      • 5.2 연구의 활용 방안 및 기대효과 257
      • 5.3 향후 연구 방향 258
      • 참고 문헌 260
      • Abstract 284
      • 부 록 287
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼