RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      과학전람회 활성화를 위한 출품 가이드라인 개발 = Development of Submission Guidelines to Promote Science Fairs

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17393060

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        대구 : 경북대학교 대학원, 2026

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문 (석사) -- 경북대학교 대학원 , 과학교육학과 , 2026. 2

      • 발행연도

        2026

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 주제어
      • DDC

        372.35 판사항(23)

      • 발행국(도시)

        대구

      • 형태사항

        iii, 93 p. : 도표 ; 26 cm

      • 일반주기명

        지도교수: 박종석
        참고문헌 수록

      • UCI식별코드

        I804:22001-000000112457

      • 소장기관
        • 경북대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study seeks to revitalize science fairs by analysing participation trends and operational rules of the National Science Fair and the Gyeongsangbuk‑do Science Fair, identifying the inquiry characteristics of middle school projects, and developing a teacher-oriented submission guideline and a generative AI‑based topic‑selection prompt. Data from 2015–2024 show a sharp decline in regional entries and a 42% drop in Gyeongsangbuk‑do entries after 2017, with particularly weak participation at the middle school level. Projects advancing to the national competition were characterised by topics rooted in everyday life and local issues, clear criteria and repeated comparative experiments, concise data presentation and strong field relevance, underscoring the role of inquiry experiences in fostering scientific thinking and citizenship.
      Teacher interviews and document analysis revealed that time constraints, administrative burdens and limited guidance experience are primary barriers to participation. In response, the study compares and synthesises 2015–2024 science fair regulations to produce a comprehensive submission guideline detailing annual schedules, entry routes by school level, document formats, blind review requirements, scoring criteria, interview procedures and safety/ethics provisions. The guideline aims to reduce confusion for new teachers by aligning preparation steps with regional fairs (May–June) and national finals (September–November).
      Additionally, to support teachers and students at the topic‑selection stage, we designed a generative AI prompt that integrates the 2022 revised science curriculum and judging principles of the science fair. The prompt collects award‑winning project data from the National Science Museum and reliable social and environmental news, pairing past projects with current issues across six thematic domains to suggest research topics. It provides a template for title, rationale, objectives, hypotheses, methods and results, specifies the use of school‑accessible equipment and safety elements, and stipulates graphical and tabular presentation. While the AI prompt broadens topic exploration, the study stresses that its educational value depends on teacher judgement, explicit safety and ethics instruction, and student‑driven inquiry.
      In conclusion, the submission guideline and AI prompt offer practical tools to lower participation barriers. The study discusses educational implications including teacher professional development and administrative support, community governance, and reforms to assessment and record‑keeping systems, all of which are necessary to reinvigorate science fairs.
      번역하기

      This study seeks to revitalize science fairs by analysing participation trends and operational rules of the National Science Fair and the Gyeongsangbuk‑do Science Fair, identifying the inquiry characteristics of middle school projects, and developin...

      This study seeks to revitalize science fairs by analysing participation trends and operational rules of the National Science Fair and the Gyeongsangbuk‑do Science Fair, identifying the inquiry characteristics of middle school projects, and developing a teacher-oriented submission guideline and a generative AI‑based topic‑selection prompt. Data from 2015–2024 show a sharp decline in regional entries and a 42% drop in Gyeongsangbuk‑do entries after 2017, with particularly weak participation at the middle school level. Projects advancing to the national competition were characterised by topics rooted in everyday life and local issues, clear criteria and repeated comparative experiments, concise data presentation and strong field relevance, underscoring the role of inquiry experiences in fostering scientific thinking and citizenship.
      Teacher interviews and document analysis revealed that time constraints, administrative burdens and limited guidance experience are primary barriers to participation. In response, the study compares and synthesises 2015–2024 science fair regulations to produce a comprehensive submission guideline detailing annual schedules, entry routes by school level, document formats, blind review requirements, scoring criteria, interview procedures and safety/ethics provisions. The guideline aims to reduce confusion for new teachers by aligning preparation steps with regional fairs (May–June) and national finals (September–November).
      Additionally, to support teachers and students at the topic‑selection stage, we designed a generative AI prompt that integrates the 2022 revised science curriculum and judging principles of the science fair. The prompt collects award‑winning project data from the National Science Museum and reliable social and environmental news, pairing past projects with current issues across six thematic domains to suggest research topics. It provides a template for title, rationale, objectives, hypotheses, methods and results, specifies the use of school‑accessible equipment and safety elements, and stipulates graphical and tabular presentation. While the AI prompt broadens topic exploration, the study stresses that its educational value depends on teacher judgement, explicit safety and ethics instruction, and student‑driven inquiry.
      In conclusion, the submission guideline and AI prompt offer practical tools to lower participation barriers. The study discusses educational implications including teacher professional development and administrative support, community governance, and reforms to assessment and record‑keeping systems, all of which are necessary to reinvigorate science fairs.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 8
      • 1. 과학전람회의 개념과 교육적 의의 8
      • 2. 전국과학전람회의 제도와 운영 체제 12
      • 3. 과학전람회 참여 활성화 관련 선행연구 16
      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 8
      • 1. 과학전람회의 개념과 교육적 의의 8
      • 2. 전국과학전람회의 제도와 운영 체제 12
      • 3. 과학전람회 참여 활성화 관련 선행연구 16
      • Ⅲ. 연구 방법 18
      • 1. 연구 대상 및 범위 18
      • 2. 연구 절차 20
      • 3. 자료 분석 방법 22
      • 4. 생성형 AI 활용 방법 23
      • Ⅳ. 연구 결과 및 논의 25
      • 1. 전국과학전람회 및 경상북도과학전람회의 출품작 현황 분석 25
      • 2. 전국과학전람회에 진출한 경상북도과학전람회 중학교 부문 출품작의 특징 40
      • 3. 과학전람회 출품 가이드라인 47
      • 4. 생성형 AI를 활용한 주제선정 지원 프롬프트 68
      • Ⅴ. 결론 82
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼