RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      건축 분야의 인공지능 활용을 위한 시각 데이터셋의 구조적 유형 분석에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Typological Analysis of Visual Datasets for Artificial Intelligence Research in Architecture

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17393030

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a key technology driving innovation across diverse industries, including architecture; however, its practical application in the architectural domain remains limited. One of the main causes is the lack of high-quality training datasets and insufficient quality management. The performance of AI models depends heavily on the scale, precision, and annotation accuracy of datasets, yet architectural data are difficult to publish or share due to copyright restrictions and domain-specific complexity, often existing in irregular formats. Accordingly, this study aims to systematically collect, classify, and analyze visual datasets applicable to AI training and benchmarking in architecture, in order to clarify their structural typologies and practical characteristics.

      Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic literature review was conducted on major academic publications and web resources from 2005 to 2025. Out of 778 identified studies, 53 datasets related to architectural visual data were selected and analyzed using standardized indicators such as modality (photo, drawing, 3D), annotation type, data scale, accessibility, and application domain. As a result, architectural visual datasets were categorized into three primary modalities and eight subtypes. Photo-based datasets were divided into single-view, panoramic, and aerial imagery; drawing-based datasets were grouped into raster and vector formats; and 3D datasets were classified into depth-based views, geometric models, and attribute-based models.

      By type, photo datasets are primarily used for object detection and style classification tasks, while drawing datasets serve as key resources for floor-plan recognition, generation, and object detection. Three-dimensional datasets are widely used for spatial understanding, simulation, and performance evaluation but face limitations in accessibility and standardization. Among these, BIM/IFC-based attribute models possess the highest potential but remain restricted by copyright and file-format compatibility issues.

      This study moves beyond previous works that focused solely on individual dataset reports or case-specific utilization by providing a structural and quantitative comparison across dataset types. It proposes a standardized taxonomy and comparative indicators to help researchers and practitioners select datasets appropriate to their objectives. The findings contribute academic foundations for the systematic construction, sharing, and evaluation of architectural AI datasets and may serve as a reference framework for establishing a national-level architectural data hub and AI training infrastructure in the future.
      번역하기

      In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a key technology driving innovation across diverse industries, including architecture; however, its practical application in the architectural domain remains limited. One of the main causes ...

      In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a key technology driving innovation across diverse industries, including architecture; however, its practical application in the architectural domain remains limited. One of the main causes is the lack of high-quality training datasets and insufficient quality management. The performance of AI models depends heavily on the scale, precision, and annotation accuracy of datasets, yet architectural data are difficult to publish or share due to copyright restrictions and domain-specific complexity, often existing in irregular formats. Accordingly, this study aims to systematically collect, classify, and analyze visual datasets applicable to AI training and benchmarking in architecture, in order to clarify their structural typologies and practical characteristics.

      Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic literature review was conducted on major academic publications and web resources from 2005 to 2025. Out of 778 identified studies, 53 datasets related to architectural visual data were selected and analyzed using standardized indicators such as modality (photo, drawing, 3D), annotation type, data scale, accessibility, and application domain. As a result, architectural visual datasets were categorized into three primary modalities and eight subtypes. Photo-based datasets were divided into single-view, panoramic, and aerial imagery; drawing-based datasets were grouped into raster and vector formats; and 3D datasets were classified into depth-based views, geometric models, and attribute-based models.

      By type, photo datasets are primarily used for object detection and style classification tasks, while drawing datasets serve as key resources for floor-plan recognition, generation, and object detection. Three-dimensional datasets are widely used for spatial understanding, simulation, and performance evaluation but face limitations in accessibility and standardization. Among these, BIM/IFC-based attribute models possess the highest potential but remain restricted by copyright and file-format compatibility issues.

      This study moves beyond previous works that focused solely on individual dataset reports or case-specific utilization by providing a structural and quantitative comparison across dataset types. It proposes a standardized taxonomy and comparative indicators to help researchers and practitioners select datasets appropriate to their objectives. The findings contribute academic foundations for the systematic construction, sharing, and evaluation of architectural AI datasets and may serve as a reference framework for establishing a national-level architectural data hub and AI training infrastructure in the future.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 제 1장 서론 01
      • 1.1 연구의 배경 및 목적 02
      • 1.2 연구의 대상 및 방법 05
      • 제 2장 이론적 배경 및 선행 연구 분석 07
      • 2.1 데이터셋의 유형화와 도메인 특수성 08
      • 제 1장 서론 01
      • 1.1 연구의 배경 및 목적 02
      • 1.2 연구의 대상 및 방법 05
      • 제 2장 이론적 배경 및 선행 연구 분석 07
      • 2.1 데이터셋의 유형화와 도메인 특수성 08
      • 2.2 선행 연구 분석 12
      • 2.2.1 인공지능의 성능과 데이터셋의 관계 12
      • 2.2.2 건축 분야의 데이터셋 활용 및 구축 연구 16
      • 제 3장 건축 분야의 시각 데이터 유형화 및 데이터셋 현황 18
      • 3.1 건축 분야 시각 데이터 유형화 19
      • 3.1.1 사진 유형 21
      • 3.1.2 도면 유형 22
      • 3.1.3 3D 유형 23
      • 3.2 건축 분야 시각 데이터셋의 현황 조사 26
      • 3.2.1 데이터셋 수집 및 선별 절차 26
      • 3.2.2 데이터셋 구축 현황 29
      • 제 4장 건축 분야 시각 데이터셋의 유형별 분석 및 비교 39
      • 4.1 사진 기반 시각 데이터셋 분석 40
      • 4.1.1 단일 시점 이미지 40
      • 4.1.2 파노라마 이미지 43
      • 4.1.3 원격/항공 이미지 46
      • 4.2 도면 기반 공간 표현 시각 데이터셋 분석 49
      • 4.2.1 래스터(Raster) 형식 도면 50
      • 4.2.2 벡터(Vector) 형식 도면 52
      • 4.3 3D 공간 구조 시각 데이터셋 분석 55
      • 4.3.1 깊이 기반 시점 데이터 56
      • 4.3.2 형상 모델 데이터 57
      • 4.3.3 속성 기반 모델 데이터 60
      • 4.4 유형별 비교 분석 및 활용 전략 63
      • 4.4.1 유형별 데이터셋 특성 비교 분석 63
      • 4.4.2 데이터셋 선택 시 고려 요소 도출 67
      • 4.4.3 적용 사례 및 활용 시나리오 70
      • 제 5장 결론 72
      • 참고문헌 75
      • 영문요약 86
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼