This study investigates how authoritarian attitudes—rooted in individuals’ Needs for Security and Certainty (NSC)—shape support for redistributive policies in contemporary India. Bridging political psychology with India’s evolving welfare land...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17376998
서울 : 한국외국어대학교 국제지역대학원, 2026
학위논문(석사) -- 한국외국어대학교 국제지역대학원 , 인도·아세안학과 , 2026. 2
2026
영어
915.4 판사항(22)
서울
xi, 108 p. : 삽도 ; 26 cm
한국외국어대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
지도교수: Kim Chan-wahn
참고문헌: p. 97-105
I804:11059-200000952033
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This study investigates how authoritarian attitudes—rooted in individuals’ Needs for Security and Certainty (NSC)—shape support for redistributive policies in contemporary India. Bridging political psychology with India’s evolving welfare land...
This study investigates how authoritarian attitudes—rooted in individuals’ Needs for Security and Certainty (NSC)—shape support for redistributive policies in contemporary India. Bridging political psychology with India’s evolving welfare landscape, the analysis examines how psychological dispositions interact with economic and political contexts, particularly under the rise of authoritarian-populist governance. Using nationally representative data from the 2019 Asian Barometer Survey, the results show that authoritarian attitudes are positively associated with support for redistribution, reflecting a stability-oriented logic in which welfare is valued as a mechanism for maintaining order and predictability. The moderating analyses highlight the context-dependence of this relationship. Political interest does not significantly alter the association, a pattern consistent with India’s depoliticized redistribution environment where welfare is broadly understood as a routine state function rather than an ideological or partisan issue. In contrast, perceived economic threat weakens—rather than strengthens—the positive link between authoritarian attitudes and redistributive support, diverging from findings in other regions. Under heightened economic pessimism, authoritarian motivations shift toward deference to authority and system-justifying tendencies, reducing the demand for redistributive expansion. These dynamics intersect with India’s broader political trajectory, wherein rights-based welfare regimes of the early 2000s have increasingly been centralized and personalized under the Modi administration. The findings extend research on authoritarian attitudes and redistribution beyond Western contexts and offer a novel psychological account of how authoritarian-populist governance leverages redistributive policies as a tool of legitimacy and stability. From a policy perspective, strengthening legal literacy programs such as the Designing Innovative Solutions for Holistic Access to Justice (DISHA) initiative may help reinforce citizens’ understanding of welfare as a right, thereby countering the leader-centric framing of redistributive delivery.
목차 (Table of Contents)