RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Analysis of Russia’s Expansive Legitimation Strategy in the UN General Assembly Anti-Nazi Resolutions

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17376974

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Analysis of Russia’s Expansive Legitimation Strategy in the UN General Assembly Anti-Nazi Resolutions All political regimes employ strategies to secure legitimacy, and these strategies are manifested in a more multidimensional manner in authoritarian states. However, legitimization strategies are not confined solely to domestic audiences. There also exist strategies aimed at other states, which are referred to as expansive legitimization strategies. The UN General Assembly’s anti-Nazi resolutions serve as a representative example of such strategies. This study demonstrates that when a dominant ideology exists, expansive legitimization strategies are utilized in a supplementary manner, whereas when ideology weakens or is absent, these strategies begin to be employed in a comprehensive and primary way. Furthermore, this study analyzes how Russia’s external legitimization Moon, Seung won Department of Russian and CIS Studies, Graduate School of International and Area Studies Hankuk University of Foreign Studies strategy was restored and reinforced during the transfer of power from Yeltsin to Putin. The anti-Nazi resolutions that had continued since the Cold War period were not submitted during Yeltsin’s presidency but were reintroduced only after the transition of power to Putin. Moreover, compared to Putin’s first and second terms, both the form and content of the anti-Nazi resolutions were significantly expanded during his third and fourth terms. This indicates not only the unique nature of the power transition period but also that external legitimization strategies can intensify even within the same regime.
    번역하기

    Analysis of Russia’s Expansive Legitimation Strategy in the UN General Assembly Anti-Nazi Resolutions All political regimes employ strategies to secure legitimacy, and these strategies are manifested in a more multidimensional manner in authoritaria...

    Analysis of Russia’s Expansive Legitimation Strategy in the UN General Assembly Anti-Nazi Resolutions All political regimes employ strategies to secure legitimacy, and these strategies are manifested in a more multidimensional manner in authoritarian states. However, legitimization strategies are not confined solely to domestic audiences. There also exist strategies aimed at other states, which are referred to as expansive legitimization strategies. The UN General Assembly’s anti-Nazi resolutions serve as a representative example of such strategies. This study demonstrates that when a dominant ideology exists, expansive legitimization strategies are utilized in a supplementary manner, whereas when ideology weakens or is absent, these strategies begin to be employed in a comprehensive and primary way. Furthermore, this study analyzes how Russia’s external legitimization Moon, Seung won Department of Russian and CIS Studies, Graduate School of International and Area Studies Hankuk University of Foreign Studies strategy was restored and reinforced during the transfer of power from Yeltsin to Putin. The anti-Nazi resolutions that had continued since the Cold War period were not submitted during Yeltsin’s presidency but were reintroduced only after the transition of power to Putin. Moreover, compared to Putin’s first and second terms, both the form and content of the anti-Nazi resolutions were significantly expanded during his third and fourth terms. This indicates not only the unique nature of the power transition period but also that external legitimization strategies can intensify even within the same regime.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Chapter 1. Introduction 1
    • 1.1 Background and Purpose of the Study 1
    • 1.2 Scope and Content of the Study 2
    • 1.3 Research Methodology 4
    • Chapter 1. Introduction 1
    • 1.1 Background and Purpose of the Study 1
    • 1.2 Scope and Content of the Study 2
    • 1.3 Research Methodology 4
    • Chapter 2. Theoretical Background and Analytical Framework 6
    • 2.1 Review of Previous Studies 6
    • 2.2 Theoretical Discussion 13
    • 2.3 Analytical Framework 15
    • Chapter 3. The Anti-Nazi Resolutions as an Expansive Legitimation Strategy 18
    • 3.1 The Soviet Union’s Anti-Nazi Resolutions 19
    • 3.2 The Russia’s Anti-Nazi Resolutions 25
    • 3.3 Comparison of the Soviet and Russia’s Anti-Nazi Resolutions 42
    • Chapter 4. Changes in Russia’s Anti-Nazi Resolutions at the UN General Assembly 46
    • 4.1 The Soviet Period (1967–1988) 46
    • 4.2 The Yeltsin Period (1991–1999) 49
    • 4.3 Putin’s First and Second Terms and the Medvedev Period (2000–2011) 50
    • 4.4 Putin’s Third and Fourth Terms (2012–2024) 57
    • Chapter 5. Conclusion 64
    • References 66
    • Appendix 79
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼