Analysis of Russia’s Expansive Legitimation Strategy in the UN General Assembly Anti-Nazi Resolutions All political regimes employ strategies to secure legitimacy, and these strategies are manifested in a more multidimensional manner in authoritaria...
Analysis of Russia’s Expansive Legitimation Strategy in the UN General Assembly Anti-Nazi Resolutions All political regimes employ strategies to secure legitimacy, and these strategies are manifested in a more multidimensional manner in authoritarian states. However, legitimization strategies are not confined solely to domestic audiences. There also exist strategies aimed at other states, which are referred to as expansive legitimization strategies. The UN General Assembly’s anti-Nazi resolutions serve as a representative example of such strategies. This study demonstrates that when a dominant ideology exists, expansive legitimization strategies are utilized in a supplementary manner, whereas when ideology weakens or is absent, these strategies begin to be employed in a comprehensive and primary way. Furthermore, this study analyzes how Russia’s external legitimization Moon, Seung won Department of Russian and CIS Studies, Graduate School of International and Area Studies Hankuk University of Foreign Studies strategy was restored and reinforced during the transfer of power from Yeltsin to Putin. The anti-Nazi resolutions that had continued since the Cold War period were not submitted during Yeltsin’s presidency but were reintroduced only after the transition of power to Putin. Moreover, compared to Putin’s first and second terms, both the form and content of the anti-Nazi resolutions were significantly expanded during his third and fourth terms. This indicates not only the unique nature of the power transition period but also that external legitimization strategies can intensify even within the same regime.