RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    중대재해처벌법에 따른 안전보건관리체계에 대한 사업장 평가 개선 방안

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17376744

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    On January 27, 2022, the Serious Accident Punishment Act was implemented to reduce industrial accidents in Korea and change the paradigm of industrial accident prevention. However, even after the enforcement of the law, the industrial accident rate continues to increase, so it is urgent to prepare effective countermeasures.

    This study analyzes the fundamental causes and problems of the safety and health management system established in the workplace under the Serious Accident Punishment Act, and suggests improvement measures to solve them.

    To this end, the relevant literature was reviewed to derive key elements of the safety and health management system required by the law, and the limitations and seriousness of the current system were reaffirmed by analyzing checklists provided by related organizations such as the Ministry of Employment and Labor. In addition, document review, on-site inspection, and questionnaires were conducted on 14 workplaces to derive problems, and improvement and utilization plans were proposed.
    As a result of the study, a quantitative checklist reflecting an objective and measurable evaluation method was presented as an improvement plan, replacing the qualitative checklist centered on checking whether or not it is currently used. Through quantitative evaluation, the overall safety level and most vulnerable factors of the workplace were identified, and rapid improvement measures were possible. In addition, it is not just a simple numerical evaluation, but by recording and managing deficiencies according to the evaluation criteria, continuous follow-up management can be performed until the completion of the improvement.

    This study can be seen as a step from the qualitative evaluation method for the existing safety and health management system to the quantitative evaluation method. It is expected that the detailed standards and the evaluation improvement measures proposed until subsequent studies are conducted will serve as the basis for internalizing the safety and health management system at the workplace and ultimately contributing to preventing serious accidents.

    Keywords: Serious Accident Punishment Act, Safety and Health Management System, Checklist, Quantitative Assessment, Act on the Punishment of Serious Accidents, etc.
    번역하기

    On January 27, 2022, the Serious Accident Punishment Act was implemented to reduce industrial accidents in Korea and change the paradigm of industrial accident prevention. However, even after the enforcement of the law, the industrial accident rate co...

    On January 27, 2022, the Serious Accident Punishment Act was implemented to reduce industrial accidents in Korea and change the paradigm of industrial accident prevention. However, even after the enforcement of the law, the industrial accident rate continues to increase, so it is urgent to prepare effective countermeasures.

    This study analyzes the fundamental causes and problems of the safety and health management system established in the workplace under the Serious Accident Punishment Act, and suggests improvement measures to solve them.

    To this end, the relevant literature was reviewed to derive key elements of the safety and health management system required by the law, and the limitations and seriousness of the current system were reaffirmed by analyzing checklists provided by related organizations such as the Ministry of Employment and Labor. In addition, document review, on-site inspection, and questionnaires were conducted on 14 workplaces to derive problems, and improvement and utilization plans were proposed.
    As a result of the study, a quantitative checklist reflecting an objective and measurable evaluation method was presented as an improvement plan, replacing the qualitative checklist centered on checking whether or not it is currently used. Through quantitative evaluation, the overall safety level and most vulnerable factors of the workplace were identified, and rapid improvement measures were possible. In addition, it is not just a simple numerical evaluation, but by recording and managing deficiencies according to the evaluation criteria, continuous follow-up management can be performed until the completion of the improvement.

    This study can be seen as a step from the qualitative evaluation method for the existing safety and health management system to the quantitative evaluation method. It is expected that the detailed standards and the evaluation improvement measures proposed until subsequent studies are conducted will serve as the basis for internalizing the safety and health management system at the workplace and ultimately contributing to preventing serious accidents.

    Keywords: Serious Accident Punishment Act, Safety and Health Management System, Checklist, Quantitative Assessment, Act on the Punishment of Serious Accidents, etc.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 제1장 서 론 1
    • 제1절 연구배경 및 목적 1
    • 1. 연구배경 1
    • 2. 연구목적 3
    • 제2절 연구범위 및 방법 4
    • 제1장 서 론 1
    • 제1절 연구배경 및 목적 1
    • 1. 연구배경 1
    • 2. 연구목적 3
    • 제2절 연구범위 및 방법 4
    • 1. 연구범위 4
    • 2. 연구방법 5
    • 제3절 선행 연구 현황 및 검토·분석 8
    • 1. 중대재해처벌법의 안전보건관리체계에 대한 연구 현황 8
    • 가. 중대재해처벌법의 본질 측면 8
    • 나. 중대재해처벌법의 효과적인 관리 측면 10
    • 다. 안전보건관리 수준평가 및 정량적 평가방안 측면 12
    • 2. 선행 연구 검토·분석 및 본 연구의 방향 13
    • 제2장 이론적 고찰 15
    • 제1절 중대재해처벌법 입법 배경 15
    • 1. 입법 배경 15
    • 2. 입법 경과 16
    • 제2절 안전보건 관련 법령 체계 및 비교 18
    • 1. 산업안전보건법 상 안전보건관리체제 18
    • 2. 중대재해처벌법의 안전보건관리체계 19
    • 3. 산업안전보건법과 중대재해처벌법의 비교 고찰 19
    • 4. 중대재해처벌법과 유사한 다른 나라 법령 비교 20
    • 제3절 안전보건관리체계 평가를 위한 이론적 배경 24
    • 1. 법경제학적 유인 구조와 최적의 사고 회피자 24
    • 2. 안전보건경영시스템의 순환 구조와 체계적 관리 24
    • 3. 조직의 성숙도 모델 27
    • 4. 안전문화와 안전풍토 28
    • 5. 리스크 매니지먼트 모형 28
    • 6. 평가방안 설계를 위한 계량화 이론 29
    • 제4절 연구 분석의 틀 30
    • 제3장 중대재해처벌법의 안전보건관리체계 구축 현황 및 수준 분석 31
    • 제1절 사업장의 안전보건관리체계 구축 및 재해율 현황 분석 31
    • 제2절 사업장의 안전보건관리체계 수준 및 문제점 분석 36
    • 1. 조사 설계 및 방법 36
    • 가. 표본 설계 및 대상 선정 36
    • 나. 측정도구의 타당도 및 신뢰도 검증 37
    • 다. 현장조사 절차 및 분석도구 39
    • 2. 사업장 설문조사 결과 분석 41
    • 가. 우수사항 41
    • 나. 미흡사항 42
    • 다. 설문조사 세부분석 결과 43
    • 3. 사업장 현장 점검 51
    • 4. 고용노동부·안전보건공단에서 제공한 점검표 분석 65
    • 제3절 문제점 및 개선방안 제시 69
    • 제4장 중대재해처벌법의 안전보건관리체계 평가방안 제시 및 사업장 적용 72
    • 제1절 안전보건관리체계에 대한 평가방안 구성안 72
    • 1. 개선 방안의 세부항목 구성 시 원칙 73
    • 2. 개선 방안 구성 시 반영 내용 74
    • 3. 개선 방안에 대한 적용 시 활용 방법 75
    • 제2절 안전보건관리체계에 대한 평가 개선안 75
    • 제3절 사업장 적용 82
    • 제5장 결 론 86
    • 참고문헌 88
    • 부록 93
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼