As global markets grow more competitive and knowledge becomes a key economic asset, firms’ long-term development increasingly depends on their ability to enhance innovation capabilities. As a crucial driver of organizational innovation, Researchers ...
As global markets grow more competitive and knowledge becomes a key economic asset, firms’ long-term development increasingly depends on their ability to enhance innovation capabilities. As a crucial driver of organizational innovation, Researchers and practitioners now devote considerable attention to how different leadership approaches shape employees’ behavioral responses and psychological resources. In China’s distinctive organizational environment, traditional hierarchical management often suppresses employee initiative and creativity. Therefore, Exploring leadership approaches that align with China’s organizational environment and assessing their effects on employees’ innovation outcomes holds significant theoretical and practical value. This study focuses on inclusive leadership and proposes an integrated framework comprising multiple psychological and behavioral pathways. Drawing upon extensive domestic and international literature, eleven hypotheses were proposed, covering direct, mediating, moderating, and moderated mediating effects. Established measurement scales were revised to fit the Chinese context, and a large sample survey was conducted among frontline employees. The analyses were conducted with SPSS 25.0, AMOS 24.0, and PROCESS 3.5, which facilitated reliability assessment, CFA, structural equation modeling, and mediation-moderation testing to verify the hypotheses. The results indicate that Inclusive leadership enhances employees’ innovation outcomes not only through direct effects but also via several indirect psychological and behavioral processes. Voice behavior and positive psychological capital act as key mediating mechanisms: the former represents proactive communication and problem-solving actions, whereas the latter reflects employees’ psychological resources that sustain motivation and resilience. Regarding moderation, job crafting positively shapes how positive psychological capital relates to innovation outcomes and amplifies the indirect influence of inclusive leadership through positive psychological capital. This implies suggesting that employees who proactively redefine their task boundaries are better able to convert psychological resources into innovative outputs. However, job crafting did not exhibit a significant moderating role on the direct impacts of inclusive leadership or voice behavior on innovation outcomes, indicating that contextual factors such as job autonomy and organizational systems may shape its boundary conditions. Theoretically, this study deepens the theoretical comprehension of inclusive leadership by clarifying both its direct and indirect influences on innovation, and broadens the application of social cognitive theory and conservation of resources perspectives. Practically, organizations should cultivate inclusive leadership, protect employee voice, strengthen psychological capital development, and offer reasonable autonomy to support job crafting, ultimately fostering sustainable innovation capacity in dynamic environments.