The architectural landscape of the Philippines went through one of the most transformative periods during the Marcos administration (1965–1986), particularly under the conditions of Martial Law (1972–1981). It was an era not only characterized by ...
The architectural landscape of the Philippines went through one of the most transformative periods during the Marcos administration (1965–1986), particularly under the conditions of Martial Law (1972–1981). It was an era not only characterized by the extreme political and socio-economic changes, but also by the lasting impact it left on the evolution of Philippine Architecture. The government’s ambition to project an image of national progress initiated an unprecedented wave of expedited construction projects, mostly commissioned by the former First Lady Imelda Marcos. These were aimed to define and forge a strong sense of Filipino identity after periods of colonialism. The convergence of strong political will, economic resources, and architectural innovation of that period enabled the realization of projects that might otherwise have remained conceptual.
Architecturally, this period became known for the extensive amount of monumental architectural projects commissioned. It left behind a legacy that has continuously dominated space and also public memory. These͏͏ structures͏͏ have͏͏ served͏͏ as͏͏ evidence͏͏ of͏͏ the͏͏ Marcos administration’s power and͏͏ are͏͏ often͏͏ referred͏͏ to͏͏ by͏͏ supporters͏͏ as͏͏ proof͏͏ of͏͏ a͏͏ golden͏͏ age of͏͏ the͏͏ the Philippines.͏͏ The golden age narrative,͏͏ while͏͏ frequently͏͏ examined͏͏ ͏͏under͏͏ an͏͏ economic͏͏ lens͏͏ to͏͏ study the͏͏ severe͏͏ detrimental effect on the national economy,͏͏ is͏͏ rarely͏͏ analyzed through͏͏ the͏͏ lens͏͏ of͏͏ architecture͏͏ itself,͏͏ the͏͏ very͏͏ medium͏͏ through͏͏ which͏͏ the͏͏ regime͏͏ sought͏͏ to͏͏ timelessly͏͏ project͏͏ their power.͏͏ This͏͏ study͏͏ addresses͏͏ that͏͏ gap͏͏ through an exhaustive review of the͏͏ intersection͏͏ of͏͏ architecture͏͏ and͏͏ power͏͏ during͏͏ the͏͏ Marcos͏͏ administration,͏͏ focusing on͏͏ two buildings,͏͏ the CCP Main Building and the Coconut Palace. Both buildings are on the reclaimed͏͏ site͏͏ known as the CCP Complex, the͏͏ core of the commissioned͏͏ cultural͏͏ projects͏͏ during͏͏ of Marcos͏͏ era.͏͏ The͏͏ CCP͏͏ Main͏͏ Building was built͏͏ at͏͏ the͏͏ beginning͏͏ of͏͏ the͏͏ regime and͏͏ the͏͏ Coconut͏͏ Palace was constructed͏͏ towards the end, with its inauguration coinciding the day Martial Law was officially lifted. The stark difference in political context at the time of conception to inauguration of both buildings are reflected in the built form, evident͏͏ in͏͏ scale,͏͏ form,͏͏ and͏͏ spatial͏͏ organization.͏͏ Despite͏͏ the differences in design strategies involved,͏͏ these bipolar qualities converge into a share͏d objective,͏͏ to͏͏ embody͏͏ and͏͏ project͏͏ power.͏͏ Analyzing the implications of these͏͏ parallel and contrasting͏͏ points,͏ reveal how political͏͏ power͏͏ is inscribed into͏͏ architecture͏͏ through͏͏ multiple strategies,͏͏ shaping͏͏ public͏͏ perception,͏͏ cultural͏͏ identity,͏͏ and͏͏ leaving a timeless legacy͏͏.͏͏
In͏͏ the period of Martial Law under the Marcos administration,͏͏ critique͏͏ on͏͏ government͏͏ activities͏͏ were͏͏ severely͏͏ constrained͏͏ and͏͏ carried͏͏ significant͏͏ risks͏͏ for͏͏ those͏͏ who͏͏ questioned͏͏ the͏͏ regime’s͏͏ narratives.͏͏ Building on the privilege to study a topic in today’s time, this paper aims ͏͏to͏͏ examine the allegations of the architectural golden age narrative surrounding the built environment under the Marcos administration and contribute͏͏ to͏͏ a͏͏ broad discourse͏͏ regarding͏͏ the͏͏ architectural͏͏ strategies͏͏ that͏͏ influenced͏͏ such͏͏ claims,͏͏ offering͏͏ a͏͏ critical͏͏ lens͏͏ through͏͏ which͏͏ to͏͏ understand͏͏ how͏͏ built͏͏ forms͏͏ were͏͏ mobilized͏͏ to͏͏ shape͏͏ public͏͏ memory͏͏ and͏͏ political͏͏ legitimacy.