As maritime trade growth is anticipated to decelerate to around 2% per year until 2030, container terminals—responsible for over 80% of worldwide seaborne traffic—are redirecting their operational emphasis from capacity augmentation to the efficie...
As maritime trade growth is anticipated to decelerate to around 2% per year until 2030, container terminals—responsible for over 80% of worldwide seaborne traffic—are redirecting their operational emphasis from capacity augmentation to the efficient usage of current resources. In this evolving landscape, terminal competitiveness increasingly hinges on the proper operation of existing infrastructure and equipment, rendering operational decision-making under resource restrictions increasingly vital. Bottlenecks in container flows resulting from waterside activities associated with boats and landside operations related to inland transportation have emerged as critical factors limiting overall terminal performance.
This dissertation addresses two major operational decision problems to alleviate these bottlenecks: quay crane scheduling on the waterside and drayage truck routing on the landside. On the waterside, the focus is on dual-spreader quay cranes, which are increasingly adopted to improve handling speeds for large container vessels. While dual-spreader cranes can lift two containers simultaneously and increase potential quay productivity, actual operations require consideration of mode changeovers and weight constraints, making scheduling far more complex than for conventional single-spreader cranes. In particular, computational complexity increases as the number of combinations of feasible tandem-lift container pairs increases.
Previous studies have addressed this problem using sequence-based mixed-integer programming formulations that provide precise representations. However, for large vessels with hundreds of containers, model size grows exponentially, limiting the ability to obtain solutions within practical time frames. To overcome this limitation, this study proposes a phase-based approach that assigns containers to phases defined by mode changeovers rather than individual sequence positions. The proposed approach is proven theoretically equivalent to sequence-based models, thereby preserving both representational accuracy and solution optimality. Building on this foundation, a two-stage solution method is developed that first determines lift types and phases, and then constructs detailed sequences within each phase. Computational experiments demonstrate efficiency gains over state-of-the-art logic-based Benders decomposition, solving large bay problems with up to 500 containers in under 12 seconds.
On the landside, this study addresses truck routing under separation-mode drayage operations, which are used to enhance truck utilization flexibility. In separation mode, trucks can decouple from trailers during loading and unloading at customer sites, enabling more efficient routing. However, this also introduces compound challenges involving truck–trailer synchronization in time and space, along with empty container management. Despite these complexities, most existing studies either assume empty containers are always available or pre-plan empty container flows separately.
To overcome these limitations, this study proposes an integrated model that treats empty container sourcing and repositioning as endogenous decision variables. The proposed model explicitly captures shipping-line compatibility constraints and dual-transaction requirements within a multi-terminal environment. Recognizing that branch-and-bound approaches become increasingly difficult as problem size grows, an Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search (ALNS) algorithm is also designed to efficiently solve large-scale instances. Computational experiments show that the MIP formulation fails to find optimal solutions for instances with 36 or more requests within one hour, whereas the proposed ALNS solves instances with up to 180 requests in under 17 minutes, serving an average of 4.6 additional requests on the largest instances compared to the MIP.
The results of this dissertation contribute to faster and more cost-effective operational decision-making for terminal operators and trucking companies across both waterside and landside domains. The phase-based crane scheduling approach provides quantitative foundations for rapidly comparing and evaluating alternative operational scenarios in higher-level decisions such as crane assignment and berth allocation. The integrated approach to landside drayage, by explicitly incorporating realistic operational constraints including empty container availability and repositioning, demonstrates potential as an analytical tool to support dispatchers in day-to-day decision-making.