Urbanization and the increasing occurrence of short-duration, high-intensity rainfall have exposed the limitations of Conventional Urban Drainage systems (CUDs), which rely primarily on surface conveyance and offer limited infiltration and temporary s...
Urbanization and the increasing occurrence of short-duration, high-intensity rainfall have exposed the limitations of Conventional Urban Drainage systems (CUDs), which rely primarily on surface conveyance and offer limited infiltration and temporary storage capacity. This study examines infiltration-type rainwater drainage systems (IRDs) to characterize their hydraulic and hydrologic behavior and to assess their performance in comparison with CUDs. The primary aim is to identify how IRDs influence runoff generation and attenuation, and to establish numerical modeling strategies suitable for their heterogeneous and anisotropic structure.
Rainfall experiments were conducted using full-scale IRDs and O-shape Channel system (OCs) physical model under identical initial and boundary conditions. The tests were performed after pre-saturating both systems to ensure consistent initial condition. The IRDs comprise a block layer made of permeable blocks and joints, and a sand layer composed of a granular sand medium. Measurements of outflow initiation, peak discharge behavior, and drainage patterns after rainfall cessation were used to analyze the infiltration, storage, and delayed-release characteristics of IRDs. The experimental observations show that IRDs delay runoff initiation, moderate surface discharge, and provide improved attenuation of hydrologic responses compared with CUDs.
A three-dimensional numerical model was adopted to reproduce these processes and to evaluate the flow mechanisms within the IRDs. Experimentally measured permeability and porosity obtained from constant-head tests primarily represent vertical hydraulic properties and did not yield sufficient correspondence with the rainfall experiments when directly applied to the numerical model.
This inconsistency arises from the heterogeneous and anisotropic block and sand layer structure, which cannot be fully represented at the grid scale. To resolve this issue, effective permeability (keff) and effective porosity (neff) were introduced to describe the averaged hydraulic behavior of IRDs. Incorporating these effective parameters allowed stable and computationally efficient simulations and improved the statistical agreement between numerical predictions and experimental observations. Sensitivity analysis confirmed that permeability and porosity exert substantial influence on the discharge behavior of IRDs, indicating that keff and neff should be employed when representing heterogeneous block layers in numerical simulations. The numerical model reproduced the overall trends observed in the physical experiments and demonstrated reliable predictive capability under varying conditions. These findings verify the hydrologic advantages of IRDs compared with CUDs and provide a basis for establishing design parameters that reflect realistic infiltration and drainage behavior. The outcomes of this study offer engineering guidance for the application, evaluation, and optimization of infiltration-based drainage systems in urban environments.