RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      맞벌이 부부의 가사 시간 결정 요인 : 가구 소득 수준별 차이를 중심으로 = Determinants of Housework Time among Dual-Earner Couples

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17370574

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study examines how the determinants of housework time among dual-earner couples vary by household income level. Specifically, it investigates whether the core mechanisms proposed by relative resources theory, gender ideology theory, and gender display theory operate differently across income contexts. While previous studies have largely applied these theories without questioning the conditions under which they hold, relatively little attention has been paid to the economic contexts that may enable or constrain their explanatory power.
      Using data from the 2019 Korean Time Use Survey, this study focuses on dual-earner couples living in households composed exclusively of married parents and their minor children. Household income is treated as a contextual variable that may generate differences in how couples determine the division of housework. Given the zero-inflated distribution of men’s housework time, Tobit regression models are estimated for men, while OLS regression models are used for women.
      The results show that relative income contribution is an important determinant of housework time for both men and women, but its effects vary by gender and day of the week. On weekdays, relative resources matter for both men and women, while men’s non-traditional gender ideology is associated with their own housework time only. On weekends, men’s housework time continues to be shaped by their non-traditional gender ideology, and a non-linear relationship between men’s income contribution and housework time is observed, though not fully consistent with the assumptions of gender display theory. For women, weekend housework time is influenced by both spouses’ non-traditional gender ideology: women holding more non-traditional gender ideology tend to spend more time on housework, whereas having husbands with more non-traditional gender ideology is associated with a reduction in women’s housework time.
      Most importantly, the stratification of housework decision-making mechanisms by household income is more evident on weekends than on weekdays. Patterns observed in subgroup analyses suggest that in lower-income households, increases in men’s income contribution are associated with reductions in men’s housework time, whereas such patterns are less apparent in higher-income households. In addition, the positive association between women’s non-traditional gender ideology and women’s weekend housework time appears only among households classified in the lowest- and highest-income categories. No clear evidence is found for the stratification of gender display mechanisms.
      These findings suggest that the applicability of relative resources theory and gender ideology theory may vary depending on the economic context in which couples organize paid labor and housework. By highlighting the contextual and conditional operation of housework allocation mechanisms, this study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of gendered time use among dual-earner couples.
      번역하기

      This study examines how the determinants of housework time among dual-earner couples vary by household income level. Specifically, it investigates whether the core mechanisms proposed by relative resources theory, gender ideology theory, and gender di...

      This study examines how the determinants of housework time among dual-earner couples vary by household income level. Specifically, it investigates whether the core mechanisms proposed by relative resources theory, gender ideology theory, and gender display theory operate differently across income contexts. While previous studies have largely applied these theories without questioning the conditions under which they hold, relatively little attention has been paid to the economic contexts that may enable or constrain their explanatory power.
      Using data from the 2019 Korean Time Use Survey, this study focuses on dual-earner couples living in households composed exclusively of married parents and their minor children. Household income is treated as a contextual variable that may generate differences in how couples determine the division of housework. Given the zero-inflated distribution of men’s housework time, Tobit regression models are estimated for men, while OLS regression models are used for women.
      The results show that relative income contribution is an important determinant of housework time for both men and women, but its effects vary by gender and day of the week. On weekdays, relative resources matter for both men and women, while men’s non-traditional gender ideology is associated with their own housework time only. On weekends, men’s housework time continues to be shaped by their non-traditional gender ideology, and a non-linear relationship between men’s income contribution and housework time is observed, though not fully consistent with the assumptions of gender display theory. For women, weekend housework time is influenced by both spouses’ non-traditional gender ideology: women holding more non-traditional gender ideology tend to spend more time on housework, whereas having husbands with more non-traditional gender ideology is associated with a reduction in women’s housework time.
      Most importantly, the stratification of housework decision-making mechanisms by household income is more evident on weekends than on weekdays. Patterns observed in subgroup analyses suggest that in lower-income households, increases in men’s income contribution are associated with reductions in men’s housework time, whereas such patterns are less apparent in higher-income households. In addition, the positive association between women’s non-traditional gender ideology and women’s weekend housework time appears only among households classified in the lowest- and highest-income categories. No clear evidence is found for the stratification of gender display mechanisms.
      These findings suggest that the applicability of relative resources theory and gender ideology theory may vary depending on the economic context in which couples organize paid labor and housework. By highlighting the contextual and conditional operation of housework allocation mechanisms, this study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of gendered time use among dual-earner couples.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • Ⅱ. 가사 시간 결정 이론의 논리와 한계 6
      • 1. 상대적 자원 이론(relative resources theory) 6
      • 2. 성역할 이념 이론(gender ideology theory) 11
      • 3. 성 전시 이론(gender display theory) 15
      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • Ⅱ. 가사 시간 결정 이론의 논리와 한계 6
      • 1. 상대적 자원 이론(relative resources theory) 6
      • 2. 성역할 이념 이론(gender ideology theory) 11
      • 3. 성 전시 이론(gender display theory) 15
      • Ⅲ. 연구모델 구성 20
      • 1. 데이터 및 분석 모형 20
      • 2. 변수 정의 및 측정 22
      • 1) 종속변수 22
      • 2) 독립변수 및 조절변수, 통제변수 23
      • 3. 분석 방법 33
      • Ⅳ. 분석 결과 36
      • 1. 기술통계 36
      • 2. 가사 시간에 대한 회귀분석 결과 54
      • 1) 요일 통합 가사 시간에 대한 회귀분석 결과 55
      • 2) 평일 가사 시간에 대한 회귀분석 결과 63
      • 3) 주말 가사 시간에 대한 회귀분석 결과 69
      • Ⅴ. 결론 및 한계 82
      • 부록 90
      • 참고문헌 91
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼