RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    지역사회 거주 정신질환자의 자기낙인이 회복에 미치는 영향 : 자기결정과 실천관계의 매개효과 = Effects of Self-Stigma on Recovery among Community-Dwelling People with Mental Illness: The Mediating Effects of Self-Determination and Practice Relationship

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17370423

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the mediating effects of self-determination and practice Relationship on the relationship between self-stigma and recovery among community-dwelling individuals with mental illness.

    Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 168 service users of community mental health welfare centers and psychiatric rehabilitation facilities. Data were collected using structured questionnaires assessing self-stigma, recovery, self-determination, and practice Relationship. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple regression analysis were performed using SPSS 25.0, and mediation analysis was conducted using the PROCESS macro (Model 4) with bootstrapping (5,000 resamples).

    Results: The mean level of self-stigma was 2.65 on a 5-point scale, which is lower than the midpoint, whereas recovery (3.40), self-determination (3.24), and practice Relationship (3.66) were all above the midpoint. Correlation analysis showed that self-stigma was significantly and negatively correlated with recovery (r=−.17), self-determination (r=−.19), and practice Relationship (r=−.27). Both self-determination (r=.73) and practice Relationship (r=.64) showed significant positive correlations with recovery. In the mediation model, the direct effect of self-stigma on recovery was not statistically significant (B=0.02, p=.770). However, the indirect effects through self-determination (B=−0.11, 95% BootCI [−0.22, −0.01]) and practice Relationship (B=−0.08, 95% BootCI [−0.17, −0.02]) were both significant, indicating full mediation.

    Conclusion: These findings suggest that self-stigma does not undermine recovery directly, but rather indirectly by diminishing the internal resource of self-determination and the external relational resource of the practice Relationship. Therefore, recovery-oriented interventions for people with mental illness should focus on simultaneously empowering self-determination and fostering strong, collaborative therapeutic alliances with practitioners.
    번역하기

    Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the mediating effects of self-determination and practice Relationship on the relationship between self-stigma and recovery among community-dwelling individuals with mental illness. Methods: A cross-sectional s...

    Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the mediating effects of self-determination and practice Relationship on the relationship between self-stigma and recovery among community-dwelling individuals with mental illness.

    Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 168 service users of community mental health welfare centers and psychiatric rehabilitation facilities. Data were collected using structured questionnaires assessing self-stigma, recovery, self-determination, and practice Relationship. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple regression analysis were performed using SPSS 25.0, and mediation analysis was conducted using the PROCESS macro (Model 4) with bootstrapping (5,000 resamples).

    Results: The mean level of self-stigma was 2.65 on a 5-point scale, which is lower than the midpoint, whereas recovery (3.40), self-determination (3.24), and practice Relationship (3.66) were all above the midpoint. Correlation analysis showed that self-stigma was significantly and negatively correlated with recovery (r=−.17), self-determination (r=−.19), and practice Relationship (r=−.27). Both self-determination (r=.73) and practice Relationship (r=.64) showed significant positive correlations with recovery. In the mediation model, the direct effect of self-stigma on recovery was not statistically significant (B=0.02, p=.770). However, the indirect effects through self-determination (B=−0.11, 95% BootCI [−0.22, −0.01]) and practice Relationship (B=−0.08, 95% BootCI [−0.17, −0.02]) were both significant, indicating full mediation.

    Conclusion: These findings suggest that self-stigma does not undermine recovery directly, but rather indirectly by diminishing the internal resource of self-determination and the external relational resource of the practice Relationship. Therefore, recovery-oriented interventions for people with mental illness should focus on simultaneously empowering self-determination and fostering strong, collaborative therapeutic alliances with practitioners.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
    • 2. 연구의 목적 3
    • 3. 용어 정의 4
    • Ⅱ. 문헌고찰 7
    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
    • 2. 연구의 목적 3
    • 3. 용어 정의 4
    • Ⅱ. 문헌고찰 7
    • 1. 정신질환자의 자기낙인, 회복, 자기결정, 실천관계의 개념 7
    • 2. 정신질환자의 자기낙인, 회복, 자기결정 및 실천관계와 회복 간의 관계 13
    • Ⅲ. 연구방법 19
    • 1. 연구 설계 19
    • 2. 연구 대상 19
    • 3. 연구 도구 20
    • 4. 자료 수집 방법 및 절차 24
    • 5. 윤리적 고려 25
    • 6. 자료 분석 방법 25
    • Ⅳ. 연구결과 27
    • 1. 연구대상자의 일반적 특성 및 정신질환 특성 27
    • 2. 연구대상자의 자기낙인, 회복, 자기결정, 실천관계 정도 27
    • 3. 연구 대상자의 일반적 특성에 따른 자기낙인, 회복, 자기결정, 실천관계의 차이 29
    • 4. 대상자의 자기낙인, 회복, 자기결정, 실천관계 간의 관계 32
    • 5. 대상자의 자기낙인이 회복에 미치는 영향에서 자기결정과 실천관계의 매개효과 32
    • Ⅴ. 논의 37
    • Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 43
    • 1. 결론 43
    • 2. 제언 44
    • 참 고 문 헌 46
    • 부 록 55
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼