This study examines the structural relationships among financial soundness, ESG performance, and firm value for firms listed on the KOSPI market, with particular attention to the moderating role of chaebol characteristics, a distinctive feature of Kor...
This study examines the structural relationships among financial soundness, ESG performance, and firm value for firms listed on the KOSPI market, with particular attention to the moderating role of chaebol characteristics, a distinctive feature of Korean corporate governance.
The empirical analysis is based on 3,768 firm-year observations from 2012 to 2024. To reduce potential endogeneity concerns, key explanatory variables are lagged by one period (t-1). When constructing interaction terms, orthogonalized residuals are employed to alleviate multicollinearity.
Several findings emerge from the analysis. Chaebol firms exhibit significantly higher ESG levels than non-chaebol firms, a pattern associated with greater resource availability and higher public visibility. Financial soundness, measured by operating cash flow, is positively related to ESG performance regardless of firm type, while no evidence is found that chaebol firms respond more sensitively to financial conditions. This suggests that ESG management has become
a broadly shared managerial requirement rather than a firm-type-specific strategy. However, the relationship between ESG and firm value differs across
firm types. For chaebol firms, ESG performance alone is not associated with higher Tobin’s Q. Only ESG activities supported by strong financial soundness show a positive association with firm value, consistent with a signaling interpretation in which the market assigns credibility to ESG engagement when it is accompanied by substantial resource commitment. Overall, the results highlight financial soundness as a key mechanism supporting the sustainability of ESG management and
suggest that, particularly for chaebol firms, financial capacity plays an important role in determining whether ESG investments are perceived as substantive rather than symbolic.