RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    인플루언서 유형에 따른 소셜미디어 마케팅활동이 여행의도에 미치는 영향 = The Effects of Social Media Marketing Activities on Travel Intention: A Comparative Study of Influencer Types

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17368492

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study investigates the effects of social media influencer marketing activities on travel intention by integrating the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) and Social Influence Theory. As social media influencers have emerged as key information sources shaping travelers' attitudes and decision-making, understanding the psychological mechanisms underlying their persuasive effects has become increasingly important. This study proposes an integrated research model that examines how social media marketing activities influence travel intention through dual persuasion routes—source credibility (peripheral route) and argument quality (central route)—mediated by two types of social influence: informational influence and value-expressive influence. Additionally, this study examines the moderating effects of Fear of Missing Out (FOMO), distinguishing between personal FOMO and social FOMO, and compares persuasion pathways between mega influencers (over 1 million followers) and non-mega influencers (10,000 to 1 million followers).
    Data were collected from 400 respondents, equally divided between the mega influencer group (n=200) and the non-mega influencer group (n=200). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was employed for data analysis.
    The results indicate that all nine direct effect hypotheses (H1-H9) were supported. Social media marketing activities significantly influenced both source credibility and argument quality, with a stronger effect on source credibility. Source credibility also had a significant positive effect on argument quality, confirming a halo effect from peripheral to central route cues. Both source credibility and argument quality significantly influenced informational influence and value-expressive influence, which in turn positively affected travel intention. The two types of social influence showed similar levels of effect on travel intention.
    Regarding FOMO's moderating effects, personal FOMO significantly moderated the relationship between value-expressive influence and travel intention, supporting H10. However, social FOMO showed no significant moderating effect, leading to the rejection of H11. This finding suggests that the fear of missing out on valuable experiences (personal FOMO) plays a more direct role in facilitating travel decisions than the fear of social exclusion (social FOMO).
    Multi-group analysis revealed significant differences in persuasion pathways between influencer types. Non-mega influencers exhibited a significantly stronger effect of source credibility on value-expressive influence compared to mega influencers, partially supporting H12. Furthermore, the moderating effect of personal FOMO was significant only in the mega influencer group.
    Overall, 11 of 12 hypotheses were supported. This study contributes to the literature by providing an integrated theoretical framework that combines ELM and Social Influence Theory to explain influencer marketing effectiveness in the tourism context. The findings offer practical implications for tourism marketers, suggesting that non-mega influencer campaigns should emphasize authenticity and trustworthiness, while mega influencer campaigns may benefit from activating personal FOMO through messages highlighting unique experiences. The differential effects across influencer types provide evidence-based guidance for developing tailored influencer marketing strategies in the tourism industry.
    번역하기

    This study investigates the effects of social media influencer marketing activities on travel intention by integrating the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) and Social Influence Theory. As social media influencers have emerged as key information sour...

    This study investigates the effects of social media influencer marketing activities on travel intention by integrating the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) and Social Influence Theory. As social media influencers have emerged as key information sources shaping travelers' attitudes and decision-making, understanding the psychological mechanisms underlying their persuasive effects has become increasingly important. This study proposes an integrated research model that examines how social media marketing activities influence travel intention through dual persuasion routes—source credibility (peripheral route) and argument quality (central route)—mediated by two types of social influence: informational influence and value-expressive influence. Additionally, this study examines the moderating effects of Fear of Missing Out (FOMO), distinguishing between personal FOMO and social FOMO, and compares persuasion pathways between mega influencers (over 1 million followers) and non-mega influencers (10,000 to 1 million followers).
    Data were collected from 400 respondents, equally divided between the mega influencer group (n=200) and the non-mega influencer group (n=200). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was employed for data analysis.
    The results indicate that all nine direct effect hypotheses (H1-H9) were supported. Social media marketing activities significantly influenced both source credibility and argument quality, with a stronger effect on source credibility. Source credibility also had a significant positive effect on argument quality, confirming a halo effect from peripheral to central route cues. Both source credibility and argument quality significantly influenced informational influence and value-expressive influence, which in turn positively affected travel intention. The two types of social influence showed similar levels of effect on travel intention.
    Regarding FOMO's moderating effects, personal FOMO significantly moderated the relationship between value-expressive influence and travel intention, supporting H10. However, social FOMO showed no significant moderating effect, leading to the rejection of H11. This finding suggests that the fear of missing out on valuable experiences (personal FOMO) plays a more direct role in facilitating travel decisions than the fear of social exclusion (social FOMO).
    Multi-group analysis revealed significant differences in persuasion pathways between influencer types. Non-mega influencers exhibited a significantly stronger effect of source credibility on value-expressive influence compared to mega influencers, partially supporting H12. Furthermore, the moderating effect of personal FOMO was significant only in the mega influencer group.
    Overall, 11 of 12 hypotheses were supported. This study contributes to the literature by providing an integrated theoretical framework that combines ELM and Social Influence Theory to explain influencer marketing effectiveness in the tourism context. The findings offer practical implications for tourism marketers, suggesting that non-mega influencer campaigns should emphasize authenticity and trustworthiness, while mega influencer campaigns may benefit from activating personal FOMO through messages highlighting unique experiences. The differential effects across influencer types provide evidence-based guidance for developing tailored influencer marketing strategies in the tourism industry.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목 차 ⅰ
    • 표 목 차 ⅴ
    • 그림목차 ⅶ
    • Ⅰ. 서 론 1
    • 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 1
    • 목 차 ⅰ
    • 표 목 차 ⅴ
    • 그림목차 ⅶ
    • Ⅰ. 서 론 1
    • 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 1
    • 1) 연구 배경 1
    • 2) 연구 목적 3
    • 2. 연구 내용 및 구성 체계 4
    • 1) 연구 내용 4
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 및 선행연구 7
    • 1. 정교화 가능성 모델(ELM) 7
    • 1) ELM의 개념 및 구성 7
    • 2) 중심경로와 주변경로 8
    • 3) 소셜미디어 맥락에서의 ELM 10
    • 4) 선행연구 고찰 11
    • 2. 사회적 영향 이론 12
    • 1) 사회적 영향 이론의 개념 12
    • 2) 정보적 영향 13
    • 3) 가치표현적 영향 14
    • 4) 선행연구 고찰 16
    • 3. 인플루언서 마케팅 18
    • 1) 인플루언서의 개념과 유형 18
    • 2) 메가 인플루언서와 Non-메가 인플루언서 19
    • 3) 인플루언서 유형 분류 및 차이 20
    • 4) 선행연구 고찰 23
    • 4. 소셜미디어 마케팅활동 25
    • 1) 소셜미디어 마케팅의 개념 25
    • 2) 소셜미디어 마케팅활동 구성요소 26
    • 3) 소셜미디어 마케팅활동과 설득 단서 27
    • 4) 선행연구 고찰 28
    • 5. 정보원 신뢰도, 논거의질 30
    • 1) 정보원 신뢰도 (Source Credibility) 30
    • 2) 논거의질 33
    • 3) 선행연구 고찰 34
    • 6. 여행의도 38
    • 1) 여행의도의 개념 39
    • 2) 선행연구 고찰 40
    • 7. FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) 42
    • 1) FOMO의 개념 42
    • 2) 개인적 FOMO와 사회적 FOMO 43
    • 3) 선행연구 고찰 44
    • Ⅲ. 연구모형 및 가설의 설정 47
    • 1. 연구모형 및 연구가설의 설정 47
    • 1) 선행연구의 연구모형 고찰 47
    • 2) 연구모형의 설계 48
    • 2. 연구가설의 설정 50
    • 1) 소셜미디어 마케팅활동과 정보원 신뢰도 및 논거의질 50
    • 2) 정보원 신뢰도와 논거의질 간의 관계 52
    • 3) 정보원 신뢰도, 논거의질과 사회적 영향 간의 관계 53
    • 4) 사회적 영향과 여행의도 간의 관계 55
    • 5) FOMO의 조절효과 56
    • 6) 인플루언서 유형별 차이 57
    • 3. 변수의 조작적 정의 59
    • 1) 소셜미디어 마케팅활동 59
    • 2) 정보원 신뢰도 및 논거의질 59
    • 3) 여행의도 60
    • 4) 사회적 영향 및 FOMO 60
    • 4. 연구대상 및 분석방법 62
    • 1) 연구대상 62
    • 2) 자료 수집 및 분석방법 64
    • Ⅳ. 연구 결과 65
    • 1. 자료의 수집과 표본의 특성 65
    • 2. 측정모형 검증 67
    • 1) 신뢰성 및 타당성 분석 68
    • 2) 구조모형 및 가설검증 78
    • 3) 조절효과 분석 81
    • 3. 인플루언서 유형별 비교분석 82
    • 1) 메가 인플루언서 구조모형 분석 83
    • 2) Non-메가 인플루언서 구조모형 분석 84
    • 3) 집단간 경로계수 차이 검정 85
    • 4) 집단별 FOMO 조절효과 비교 89
    • 5) 가설 검증 결과 종합 90
    • Ⅴ. 결론 92
    • 1. 연구 결과 요약 92
    • 2. 연구의 의의 및 시사점 95
    • 1) 학문적 시사점 95
    • 2) 실무적 시사점 98
    • 3. 연구의 한계점 및 향후 연구 방향 104
    • 참 고 문 헌 106
    • 영 문 초 록 118
    • 부 록 121
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼