RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    노인요양시설 요양보호사를 위한 구강간호교육프로그램 개발 및 효과 = Development and Effectiveness of an Oral Care Education Program for Caregivers in Long-Term Care Facilities

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17368437

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study developed an oral care education program to enhance oral health management competency among caregivers in long-term care facilities and evaluated its effects on caregivers’ oral health management knowledge, self-efficacy, attitudes, and performance. A nonequivalent control group pretest–posttest quasi-experimental design was employed. Participants included 60 caregivers (30 each in the experimental and control groups) recruited through convenience sampling from two long-term care facilities. The program was developed based on the Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation (ADDIE) model and comprised five sessions combining lectures and hands-on practice. Pretest data were collected from July 25 to 31, 2025, and posttest data were collected from September 1 to 5, 2025, one week after completion of the five-week intervention. Data were analyzed using SPSS WIN 28.0 with descriptive statistics, the Shapiro–Wilk test for normality, chi-square tests or Fisher’s exact tests, independent t-tests, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The homogeneity of regression slopes was examined prior to conducting the ANCOVA.
    The main findings were as follows:
    1. After controlling for baseline knowledge score, education level, and prior oral care education experience, the experimental group showed significantly higher posttest oral health management knowledge than did the control group (F=12.99, p<.001).
    2. After controlling for baseline self-efficacy score and education level, no significant difference was observed in oral health management self-efficacy between the two groups (F=1.13, p=.292).
    3. After controlling for baseline attitude score and education level, no significant difference was observed in oral health management attitude between the two groups (F=0.97, p=.329).
    4. After controlling for baseline performance score, total work experience, and the number of residents in charge, no significant difference was observed in oral health management performance between the two groups (F=0.01, p=.906).
    In conclusion, although the oral care education program developed in this study was effective in improving oral health management knowledge among caregivers in long-term care facilities, no statistically significant effects were observed for self-efficacy, attitudes, or performance. These findings indicate a need to provide repeated practice-based education to strengthen caregivers’ practical competence in oral health management and to establish institutional and environmental support at the facility level to ensure sustained performance.
    번역하기

    This study developed an oral care education program to enhance oral health management competency among caregivers in long-term care facilities and evaluated its effects on caregivers’ oral health management knowledge, self-efficacy, attitudes, and p...

    This study developed an oral care education program to enhance oral health management competency among caregivers in long-term care facilities and evaluated its effects on caregivers’ oral health management knowledge, self-efficacy, attitudes, and performance. A nonequivalent control group pretest–posttest quasi-experimental design was employed. Participants included 60 caregivers (30 each in the experimental and control groups) recruited through convenience sampling from two long-term care facilities. The program was developed based on the Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation (ADDIE) model and comprised five sessions combining lectures and hands-on practice. Pretest data were collected from July 25 to 31, 2025, and posttest data were collected from September 1 to 5, 2025, one week after completion of the five-week intervention. Data were analyzed using SPSS WIN 28.0 with descriptive statistics, the Shapiro–Wilk test for normality, chi-square tests or Fisher’s exact tests, independent t-tests, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The homogeneity of regression slopes was examined prior to conducting the ANCOVA.
    The main findings were as follows:
    1. After controlling for baseline knowledge score, education level, and prior oral care education experience, the experimental group showed significantly higher posttest oral health management knowledge than did the control group (F=12.99, p<.001).
    2. After controlling for baseline self-efficacy score and education level, no significant difference was observed in oral health management self-efficacy between the two groups (F=1.13, p=.292).
    3. After controlling for baseline attitude score and education level, no significant difference was observed in oral health management attitude between the two groups (F=0.97, p=.329).
    4. After controlling for baseline performance score, total work experience, and the number of residents in charge, no significant difference was observed in oral health management performance between the two groups (F=0.01, p=.906).
    In conclusion, although the oral care education program developed in this study was effective in improving oral health management knowledge among caregivers in long-term care facilities, no statistically significant effects were observed for self-efficacy, attitudes, or performance. These findings indicate a need to provide repeated practice-based education to strengthen caregivers’ practical competence in oral health management and to establish institutional and environmental support at the facility level to ensure sustained performance.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목 차 ⅰ
    • 표 목 차 ⅲ
    • 그림목차 ⅳ
    • Ⅰ. 서 론 01
    • 1. 연구 필요성 01
    • 목 차 ⅰ
    • 표 목 차 ⅲ
    • 그림목차 ⅳ
    • Ⅰ. 서 론 01
    • 1. 연구 필요성 01
    • 2. 연구 목적 04
    • 3. 연구 가설 04
    • 4. 용어 정의 05
    • Ⅱ. 문헌고찰 08
    • 1. 노인요양시설 입소 노인의 구강관리 현황 08
    • 2. 노인요양시설 요양보호사의 구강관리 역할 10
    • 3. 구강간호교육프로그램 및 효과 12
    • Ⅲ. 연구 방법 15
    • 1. 연구 설계 15
    • 2. 연구 대상 16
    • 3. 연구 도구 17
    • 4. 연구 진행 절차 20
    • 1) 구강간호교육프로그램 20
    • (1) 분석단계 22
    • (2) 설계단계 26
    • (3) 개발단계 28
    • (4) 실행단계 34
    • (5) 평가단계 35
    • 5. 자료 수집 방법 36
    • 6. 윤리적 고려 36
    • 7. 자료 분석 방법 37
    • Ⅳ. 연구 결과 38
    • 1. 연구 대상자의 동질성 검정 38
    • 2. 가설 검정 47
    • Ⅴ. 논의 51
    • Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 57
    • 참 고 문 헌 59
    • 영 문 초 록 68
    • 부 록 71
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼