RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    과제지향적 서킷트레이닝과 저항기반 서킷트레이닝이 만성 뇌졸중 생존자의 하지 근활성도, 보행능력 및 일상생활수행능력에 미치는 영향 = Effects of Task-Oriented Circuit Training and Resistance-Based Circuit Training on Lower Limb Muscle Activity, Walking Ability, and Activities of Daily Living in Chronic Stroke Survivors

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17368428

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the effects of task-oriented gait-based circuit training and lower limb–centered resistance-based circuit training on lower limb muscle activity, walking ability, and activities of daily living in individuals with chronic stroke.
    Fourteen individuals with chronic stroke who were hospitalized at a single institution participated in this study. Participants were assigned to either a task-oriented gait-based circuit training group (n=5) or a lower limb–centered resistance-based circuit training group (n=9). Both groups underwent circuit training interventions twice a week for eight weeks. Lower limb muscle activity was analyzed using surface electromyography (sEMG). Walking ability was assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and the Korean version of the Dynamic Gait Index (K-DGI), and activities of daily living were evaluated using the Korean version of the Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI). Intervention effects were analyzed by comparing pre- and post-intervention changes within each group and changes between the two groups.
    The results showed that the task-oriented gait-based circuit training group demonstrated significant improvements in walking adaptability and activities of daily living after the intervention (p<.05), whereas no significant changes were observed in walking endurance or gait symmetry assessed by lower limb muscle activity (p>.05). In the lower limb–centered resistance-based circuit training group, walking adaptability and activities of daily living were significantly improved after the intervention (p<.05), while walking endurance did not show a statistically significant change, although a clinically meaningful improvement was observed. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in changes in lower limb muscle activity, walking adaptability, walking endurance, or activities of daily living (p>.05).
    In conclusion, both task-oriented gait-based circuit training and lower limb–centered resistance-based circuit training can be effectively utilized as interventions to improve walking adaptability and activities of daily living in individuals with chronic stroke, and may be selectively applied according to patients’ functional characteristics and rehabilitation goals.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the effects of task-oriented gait-based circuit training and lower limb–centered resistance-based circuit training on lower limb muscle activity, walking ability, and activities of daily living in...

    The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the effects of task-oriented gait-based circuit training and lower limb–centered resistance-based circuit training on lower limb muscle activity, walking ability, and activities of daily living in individuals with chronic stroke.
    Fourteen individuals with chronic stroke who were hospitalized at a single institution participated in this study. Participants were assigned to either a task-oriented gait-based circuit training group (n=5) or a lower limb–centered resistance-based circuit training group (n=9). Both groups underwent circuit training interventions twice a week for eight weeks. Lower limb muscle activity was analyzed using surface electromyography (sEMG). Walking ability was assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and the Korean version of the Dynamic Gait Index (K-DGI), and activities of daily living were evaluated using the Korean version of the Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI). Intervention effects were analyzed by comparing pre- and post-intervention changes within each group and changes between the two groups.
    The results showed that the task-oriented gait-based circuit training group demonstrated significant improvements in walking adaptability and activities of daily living after the intervention (p<.05), whereas no significant changes were observed in walking endurance or gait symmetry assessed by lower limb muscle activity (p>.05). In the lower limb–centered resistance-based circuit training group, walking adaptability and activities of daily living were significantly improved after the intervention (p<.05), while walking endurance did not show a statistically significant change, although a clinically meaningful improvement was observed. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in changes in lower limb muscle activity, walking adaptability, walking endurance, or activities of daily living (p>.05).
    In conclusion, both task-oriented gait-based circuit training and lower limb–centered resistance-based circuit training can be effectively utilized as interventions to improve walking adaptability and activities of daily living in individuals with chronic stroke, and may be selectively applied according to patients’ functional characteristics and rehabilitation goals.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목 차 ⅰ
    • 표 목 차 ⅱ
    • 그림목차 ⅲ
    • Ⅰ. 서 론 01
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 01
    • 목 차 ⅰ
    • 표 목 차 ⅱ
    • 그림목차 ⅲ
    • Ⅰ. 서 론 01
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 01
    • 2. 연구의 목적 04
    • 3. 연구의 가설 05
    • 4. 연구의 제한점 06
    • Ⅱ. 연구 방법 07
    • 1. 연구 대상 및 기간 07
    • 1) 선정 기준 07
    • 2) 제외 기준 07
    • 2. 연구 설계 08
    • 3. 측정 도구 및 방법 09
    • 1) 표면 근전도(sEMG) 09
    • 2) 6분 걷기 검사(6MWT) 11
    • 3) 한글판 동적 보행 검사(K-DGI) 12
    • 4) 한글판 수정 바델 지수(K-MBI) 13
    • 4. 중재 방법 13
    • 1) 과제지향적 보행기반 서킷트레이닝(TOGCT) 14
    • 2) 하지중심 저항기반 서킷트레이닝(LRCT) 17
    • 5. 자료 처리 방법 20
    • Ⅲ. 연구 결과 21
    • 1. 연구 대상자의 일반적 특성 21
    • 2. TOGCT 집단의 중재 전·후 차이 분석 22
    • 1) 하지 근활성도 23
    • 2) 보행능력 24
    • (1) 보행 지구력 24
    • (2) 보행 적응성 24
    • 3) 일상생활수행능력 24
    • 3. LRCT 집단의 중재 전·후 차이 분석 24
    • 1) 하지 근활성도 25
    • 2) 보행능력 26
    • (1) 보행 지구력 26
    • (2) 보행 적응성 26
    • 3) 일상생활수행능력 26
    • 4. 두 집단 간 변화량 차이 분석 26
    • 1) 하지 근활성도 27
    • 2) 보행능력 28
    • (2) 보행 지구럭 28
    • (3) 보행 적응성 28
    • 3) 일상생활수행능력 28
    • Ⅳ. 논 의 29
    • 1. TOGCT 집단의 집단 내 변화 29
    • 2. LRCT 집단의 집단 내 변화 31
    • 3. 두 집단 간 변화량 비교 33
    • Ⅴ. 결 론 36
    • 참 고 문 헌 38
    • 영 문 초 록 45
    • 부 록 47
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼