RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Factors Affecting Training Effectiveness and Their Relationship with Aviation Safety : (An) Empirical Case Study in Yemen Global Aviation Policy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17368198

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Aviation safety is influenced not only by regulatory and technological systems but also by the quality and effectiveness of human-centered training programs. This study empirically investigates how training curriculum design (TC), instructor characteristics (IS), and the training environment (TE) influence training effectiveness (TEF) and, subsequently, aviation safety (AS) within Yemen’s civil aviation sector. Guided by Baldwin and Ford’s (1988) Transfer of Training Model and ICAO’s Competency-Based Training and Assessment (CBTA) framework, the study examines both the direct and mediated pathways linking training quality to safety performance. A quantitative, correlational, cross-sectional design was implemented using a structured questionnaire administered to aviation personnel from CAMA, Yemenia Airlines, and major airports. A total of 179 valid responses were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with 5,000 bootstrap resamples. Reliability and validity assessments confirmed strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α > 0.88) and acceptable psychometric properties. The SEM results showed that TC, IS, and TE significantly predict TEF (β = 0.270, 0.457, and 0.171, respectively). TEF, in turn, demonstrated the strongest direct effect on AS (β = 0.556). TC and IS exhibited significant direct effects on AS (β = 0.239 and 0.143), whereas TE had no significant direct effect (β = 0.0747, p = 0.143). However, all three predictors exerted significant indirect effects on AS through TEF (TC = 0.158; IS = 0.243; TE = 0.0871), confirming training effectiveness as the central mediating mechanism. The model explained 66.9% of the variance in TEF and 85.8% in AS, demonstrating strong predictive power. The findings conclude that enhancing curriculum structure, strengthening instructor competence, and improving training environments can substantially elevate aviation safety through improved training effectiveness and learning transfer. This study extends Baldwin and Ford’s model to a developing-country aviation context and provides evidence that effective training is a strategic driver of operational safety and organizational resilience. Keywords: Training Effectiveness, Aviation Safety, Structural Equation Modeling, Training Curriculum, Instructor Characteristics, Training Environment, Yemen, Civil Aviation
      번역하기

      Aviation safety is influenced not only by regulatory and technological systems but also by the quality and effectiveness of human-centered training programs. This study empirically investigates how training curriculum design (TC), instructor character...

      Aviation safety is influenced not only by regulatory and technological systems but also by the quality and effectiveness of human-centered training programs. This study empirically investigates how training curriculum design (TC), instructor characteristics (IS), and the training environment (TE) influence training effectiveness (TEF) and, subsequently, aviation safety (AS) within Yemen’s civil aviation sector. Guided by Baldwin and Ford’s (1988) Transfer of Training Model and ICAO’s Competency-Based Training and Assessment (CBTA) framework, the study examines both the direct and mediated pathways linking training quality to safety performance. A quantitative, correlational, cross-sectional design was implemented using a structured questionnaire administered to aviation personnel from CAMA, Yemenia Airlines, and major airports. A total of 179 valid responses were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with 5,000 bootstrap resamples. Reliability and validity assessments confirmed strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α > 0.88) and acceptable psychometric properties. The SEM results showed that TC, IS, and TE significantly predict TEF (β = 0.270, 0.457, and 0.171, respectively). TEF, in turn, demonstrated the strongest direct effect on AS (β = 0.556). TC and IS exhibited significant direct effects on AS (β = 0.239 and 0.143), whereas TE had no significant direct effect (β = 0.0747, p = 0.143). However, all three predictors exerted significant indirect effects on AS through TEF (TC = 0.158; IS = 0.243; TE = 0.0871), confirming training effectiveness as the central mediating mechanism. The model explained 66.9% of the variance in TEF and 85.8% in AS, demonstrating strong predictive power. The findings conclude that enhancing curriculum structure, strengthening instructor competence, and improving training environments can substantially elevate aviation safety through improved training effectiveness and learning transfer. This study extends Baldwin and Ford’s model to a developing-country aviation context and provides evidence that effective training is a strategic driver of operational safety and organizational resilience. Keywords: Training Effectiveness, Aviation Safety, Structural Equation Modeling, Training Curriculum, Instructor Characteristics, Training Environment, Yemen, Civil Aviation

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Chapter I: Introduction 1
      • 1.1 Background of the Study 1
      • 1.2 Problem Statement 4
      • 1.3 Research Objectives 6
      • 1.4 Research Questions 8
      • Chapter I: Introduction 1
      • 1.1 Background of the Study 1
      • 1.2 Problem Statement 4
      • 1.3 Research Objectives 6
      • 1.4 Research Questions 8
      • 1.5 Hypotheses of the Study 10
      • 1.6 Significance of the Study 12
      • 1.6.1 Theoretical Significance 13
      • 1.6.2 Practical Significance 13
      • 1.6.3 Policy Significance 14
      • 1.6.4 Academic Significance 14
      • 1.7 Scope of the Study 15
      • Chapter II: Review of Related Literature 17
      • 2.1 Theoretical Foundations of the Study 17
      • 2.1.1 Baldwin and Ford’s (1988) Transfer of Training Model 17
      • 2.1.2 Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Evaluation Model 20
      • 2.1.3 ICAO’s Competency-Based Training and Assessment (CBTA) Framework 23
      • 2.1.4 Human Factors and Safety Management Systems (SMS) Theory 26
      • 2.2 Training Inputs and Aviation Safety. 29
      • 2.2.1 Training Curriculum Design (TC) 29
      • 2.2.2 Instructor Characteristics (IS) 33
      • 2.2.3 Training Environment (TE) 36
      • 2.3 Training Effectiveness (TEF) and Its Role in Aviation Safety 40
      • 2.4 Aviation Safety and Human Performance 45
      • 2.5 Research Gaps and Conceptual Synthesis 49
      • 2.5.1 Identified Research Gaps 49
      • 2.5.2 How This Study Addresses the Gaps 50
      • 2.5.3 Theoretical Synthesis: Proposed Model 50
      • 2.5.4 Implications for the Present Study 51
      • Chapter III: Research Methodology 53
      • 3.1 Research Design 53
      • 3.2 Population and Sampling 54
      • 3.2.1 Target Population 54
      • 3.2.2 Sampling Technique 55
      • 3.2.3 Sample Size Determination 56
      • 3.3 Research Instrument 58
      • 3.3.1 Questionnaire Design 58
      • 3.3.2 Validity and Reliability 59
      • 3.4 Operational Definition of Variables 60
      • 3.5 Data Collection Procedure 63
      • 3.6 Data Processing and Analysis Techniques 64
      • 3.6.1 Data Screening and Preparation 64
      • 3.6.2 Descriptive Analysis 65
      • 3.6.3 Reliability and Validity Tests 66
      • 3.6.4 Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) 67
      • 3.7 Ethical Considerations 69
      • Chapter IV: Results and Discussion 71
      • 4.1 Preliminary Analysis. 71
      • 4.1.1 Sample Characteristics 71
      • 4.1.2 Reliability and Validity of Measures 79
      • 4.1.3 Descriptive Statistics and Correlations 81
      • 4.1.4 Structural Model Results 82
      • 4.2 Discussion of Findings 88
      • 4.2.1 Interpretation of Key Results 88
      • 4.2.2 Direct and Indirect Effects Explained 90
      • 4.2.3 Unexpected Findings and Model Behavior 94
      • 4.2.4 Total Effects and Variable Importance 97
      • 4.2.5 Theoretical Contributions 100
      • 4.2.6 Practical Implications 103
      • 4.2.7 Policy Implications for Yemen 106
      • Chapter V: Conclusions and Recommendations. 114
      • 5.1 Overview of the Study 114
      • 5.2 Summary of Key Findings 115
      • 5.3 Theoretical Implications 116
      • 5.4 Practical Implications 118
      • 5.5 Policy Implications for Yemen 122
      • 5.6 Recommendations 127
      • 5.7 Limitations of the Study 130
      • 5.8 Future Research Directions 132
      • 5.9 Conclusion 135
      • References 137
      • Appendix 1: Survey Questionnaire 144
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼