RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Enhancing Passenger Experience in Smart Airports : (A) Human?Technology Interaction perspective

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17368197

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Smart airports are rapidly transforming global air-transport operations by integrating digital technologies, automation, and intelligent service systems into the passenger journey. As airports expand self-service options and automate key processes, understanding how technology-driven interactions influence passenger experience and satisfaction has become a critical scholarly and managerial priority. This study examines the determinants of passenger satisfaction in smart airports from a human–technology interaction perspective, focusing on three core predictors: Self- Service Technology (SST), Passenger Readiness (REA), and Service Benefits (SB). Personalized Convenience (CON), though initially included, did not meet reliability and validity thresholds and was therefore excluded from the final empirical model. A cross-sectional survey of 100 international passengers and airport staff was analyzed using exploratory factor analysis and multiple regression. Findings indicate that Passenger Readiness is the strongest predictor of satisfaction, underscoring the importance of psychological and technological preparedness in digital environments (Parasuraman, 2000; Venkateswaran, 2020). Self-Service Technology also significantly enhances satisfaction through perceived ease of use, usefulness, and interaction quality (Kim & Park, 2019; Choi & Park, 2014). Service Benefits, including convenience, efficiency, and perceived value, demonstrate a moderate but meaningful contribution to satisfaction (Sharma, 2024; Rajapaksha & Jayasuriya, 2020). Grounded in Human–Computer Interaction (HCI) theory, the study highlights that meaningful passenger experience in smart airports emerges not from technology alone but from the quality of human–technology cooperation embedded in airport systems. These insights extend current smart- airport literature by offering an empirically validated model that positions user readiness and interface quality as central to enhancing digital passenger experience. The study also provides strategic recommendations for airport authorities and technology designers and identifies directions for future research in AI-driven personalization, trust, and digital privacy.

      KEYWORDS: Smart airports, self-service technologies, smart parking, technology readiness, perceived benefits, and passenger satisfaction.
      번역하기

      Smart airports are rapidly transforming global air-transport operations by integrating digital technologies, automation, and intelligent service systems into the passenger journey. As airports expand self-service options and automate key processes, un...

      Smart airports are rapidly transforming global air-transport operations by integrating digital technologies, automation, and intelligent service systems into the passenger journey. As airports expand self-service options and automate key processes, understanding how technology-driven interactions influence passenger experience and satisfaction has become a critical scholarly and managerial priority. This study examines the determinants of passenger satisfaction in smart airports from a human–technology interaction perspective, focusing on three core predictors: Self- Service Technology (SST), Passenger Readiness (REA), and Service Benefits (SB). Personalized Convenience (CON), though initially included, did not meet reliability and validity thresholds and was therefore excluded from the final empirical model. A cross-sectional survey of 100 international passengers and airport staff was analyzed using exploratory factor analysis and multiple regression. Findings indicate that Passenger Readiness is the strongest predictor of satisfaction, underscoring the importance of psychological and technological preparedness in digital environments (Parasuraman, 2000; Venkateswaran, 2020). Self-Service Technology also significantly enhances satisfaction through perceived ease of use, usefulness, and interaction quality (Kim & Park, 2019; Choi & Park, 2014). Service Benefits, including convenience, efficiency, and perceived value, demonstrate a moderate but meaningful contribution to satisfaction (Sharma, 2024; Rajapaksha & Jayasuriya, 2020). Grounded in Human–Computer Interaction (HCI) theory, the study highlights that meaningful passenger experience in smart airports emerges not from technology alone but from the quality of human–technology cooperation embedded in airport systems. These insights extend current smart- airport literature by offering an empirically validated model that positions user readiness and interface quality as central to enhancing digital passenger experience. The study also provides strategic recommendations for airport authorities and technology designers and identifies directions for future research in AI-driven personalization, trust, and digital privacy.

      KEYWORDS: Smart airports, self-service technologies, smart parking, technology readiness, perceived benefits, and passenger satisfaction.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1
      • CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW . 6
      • 2.1 TECHNOLOGY-BASED SELF-SERVICES 6
      • 2.2 INTERNET OF THINGS FOR SMART AIRPORT 8
      • CHAPTER 3: THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK . 12
      • CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1
      • CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW . 6
      • 2.1 TECHNOLOGY-BASED SELF-SERVICES 6
      • 2.2 INTERNET OF THINGS FOR SMART AIRPORT 8
      • CHAPTER 3: THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK . 12
      • 3.1 HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION (HCI) MODEL . 12
      • 3.2 PASSENGER EXPERIENCE 15
      • CHAPTER 4: RESEARCH HYPOTHESES (A) 18
      • 4.1 HYPOTHESIS 1: . 19
      • 4.2 HYPOTHESIS 2: . 20
      • 4.3 HYPOTHESIS 3: . 21
      • 4.4 HYPOTHESIS 4: . 22
      • 4.5 RESEARCH MODEL 23
      • CHAPTER 5: RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 24
      • 5.1 VARIABLE OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS 26
      • 5.2 DATA COLLECTION 28
      • 5.3.1 Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) 36
      • 5.3.2 Reliability Tests (Cronbach’s α) 38
      • 5.3.3 Multiple Regression Analysis 39
      • CHAPTER 6: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION . 40
      • 6.1 FACTOR ANALYSIS . 40
      • 6.1.1 CORRELATION MATRIX 40
      • 6.1.2 KMO AND BARTLETT’S TEST 42
      • 6.1.3 COMMUNALITIES 43
      • 6.1.4 TOTAL VARIANCE 45
      • 6.1.5 SCREE PLOT 47
      • 6.2 REGRESSION ANALYSIS 51
      • 6.2.1 DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS 51
      • 6.2.2 CORRELATIONS 52
      • 6.2.3 MODEL SUMMARY 53
      • 6.2.4 ANOVA 54
      • 6.2.5 COEFFICIENTS 55
      • CHAPTER 7: CONCLUSION 57
      • 7.1 RECOMMENDATIONS . 58
      • 7.2 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY 59
      • 7.3 ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS 60
      • REFERENCES 61
      • APPENDICES 65
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼