The development of a nation through improved connectivity is vital, and airport infrastructure plays a crucial role in facilitating trade and promoting regional growth. However, in many democratic systems, the progress and prioritisation of airport pr...
The development of a nation through improved connectivity is vital, and airport infrastructure plays a crucial role in facilitating trade and promoting regional growth. However, in many democratic systems, the progress and prioritisation of airport projects are often heavily influenced by political factors, particularly during election seasons. This study examines how political campaign promises have affected airport development in Ghana from 2000 to 2024 (7 election cycles). This study employs a documentary-based approach, analysing political party manifestos, campaign speeches, media reports, parliamentary records, and documents from the Ghana Airports Company Limited (GACL). In Ghana, electoral motivations, the findings reveal, are closely tied to identifiable patterns in airport projects. Like the expansion of the Kumasi Airport, which has become Prempeh I International Airport, strong economic justification and important political attention were gained by some of these projects, making them maintain momentum across different administrations. On the other hand, like the Ho and Wa Airport projects, some projects after completion can face challenges because of weak demand, symbolic regional politics and lack of stakeholder alignment, which will lead to the “white elephant” scenario and underutilization. The proposed construction of an airport in Cape Coast is another pattern that was demonstrated where projects can face delays notwithstanding repeated political commitments, due to intense public scrutiny and questioned feasibility. A Comparative Analytical Framework based on four criteria is created by this research. These are political salience, economic feasibility, institutional alignment, and project outcomes. A typology of projects on the airport is created by this and introduces, (1) Political–Economic Alignment, (2) Politically Symbolic, and (3) Politically Contested. Connecting empirical findings to concepts within Public Choice Theory and Flyvbjerg’s framework of megaproject risks, this typology represents the study's key academic contribution. In conclusion, in shaping airport development decisions in Ghana, political campaigns play a vital role. However, hinging on the project's success is the interplay between political motivations, economic realities, and institutional capabilities. As part of the study’s recommendations are the mandatory independent feasibility assessments, greater transparency in infrastructure planning, and governance reforms to ensure that, beyond electoral interests, development holds long-term values.
Keywords Airport infrastructure, political campaign promises, comparative analytical framework, white elephant and feasibility