RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      수의사 진료 프로세스에서 임상 의사결정 지원을 위한 LLM 기반 에이전트의 효과성 평가 = Evaluation of the Effectiveness of an LLM-based Agent for Clinical Decision Support in Veterinary Practice

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17368002

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study evaluates the effectiveness of a Large Language Model (LLM)-based agent designed to support the veterinary clinical process, aiming to alleviate the administrative burdens of documentation and the complexities of clinical decision-making, which are primary contributors to high workload and professional burnout among veterinarians. A mixed-methods research design was employed.
      In the first phase, a survey of 100 practicing veterinarians analyzed the need for AI technology. The results confirmed that support for the clinical reasoning (Assessment) phase, such as preliminary diagnosis support (M=6.00), was the most urgent need, rated higher than administrative conveniences such as charting automation (M=5.45). Based on these findings, a prototype system was developed, integrating Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) for academic information retrieval, Electronic Medical Record (EMR) integration, and multi-step reasoning capabilities.
      In the second phase, 30 veterinarians evaluated the system's effectiveness in a controlled scenario. The results demonstrated that the system significantly reduced cognitive load, as measured by NASA-TLX. The overall mean cognitive load score decreased from 5.57 to 3.49 (p<.001). Notably, the Performance sub-scale score increased from 4.00 to 5.40 (p=.003), indicating that the system not only reduced perceived effort but also enhanced users’ perception of task performance.
      Furthermore, the study confirmed improvements in the objective quality of clinical records. An expert panel (N=5) evaluated 20 anonymized clinical records (10 manual vs. 10 AI-assisted) and rated the AI-assisted records significantly higher across all criteria, including completeness, logical consistency, and readability (Overall Score M=4.75 vs. M=6.63, p<.001), with readability (M=6.52) showing the greatest improvement.
      The system also demonstrated high usability, scoring highly on items such as usable without separate learning (M=6.10) and intuitive and easy to use (M=5.80). However, qualitative feedback identified seamless EMR integration, voice recognition, and enhanced RAG reliability as key challenges for future commercialization.
      In conclusion, the proposed LLM-based agent proved to be an effective prototype in terms of quality, efficiency, and user satisfaction. These findings suggest that AI can function as a collaborative partner rather than a replacement, enabling clinicians to focus on higher-level clinical reasoning. With further development in workflow integration, this approach holds significant potential to reduce veterinarian burnout and improve the standardization of clinical care.
      번역하기

      This study evaluates the effectiveness of a Large Language Model (LLM)-based agent designed to support the veterinary clinical process, aiming to alleviate the administrative burdens of documentation and the complexities of clinical decision-making, w...

      This study evaluates the effectiveness of a Large Language Model (LLM)-based agent designed to support the veterinary clinical process, aiming to alleviate the administrative burdens of documentation and the complexities of clinical decision-making, which are primary contributors to high workload and professional burnout among veterinarians. A mixed-methods research design was employed.
      In the first phase, a survey of 100 practicing veterinarians analyzed the need for AI technology. The results confirmed that support for the clinical reasoning (Assessment) phase, such as preliminary diagnosis support (M=6.00), was the most urgent need, rated higher than administrative conveniences such as charting automation (M=5.45). Based on these findings, a prototype system was developed, integrating Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) for academic information retrieval, Electronic Medical Record (EMR) integration, and multi-step reasoning capabilities.
      In the second phase, 30 veterinarians evaluated the system's effectiveness in a controlled scenario. The results demonstrated that the system significantly reduced cognitive load, as measured by NASA-TLX. The overall mean cognitive load score decreased from 5.57 to 3.49 (p<.001). Notably, the Performance sub-scale score increased from 4.00 to 5.40 (p=.003), indicating that the system not only reduced perceived effort but also enhanced users’ perception of task performance.
      Furthermore, the study confirmed improvements in the objective quality of clinical records. An expert panel (N=5) evaluated 20 anonymized clinical records (10 manual vs. 10 AI-assisted) and rated the AI-assisted records significantly higher across all criteria, including completeness, logical consistency, and readability (Overall Score M=4.75 vs. M=6.63, p<.001), with readability (M=6.52) showing the greatest improvement.
      The system also demonstrated high usability, scoring highly on items such as usable without separate learning (M=6.10) and intuitive and easy to use (M=5.80). However, qualitative feedback identified seamless EMR integration, voice recognition, and enhanced RAG reliability as key challenges for future commercialization.
      In conclusion, the proposed LLM-based agent proved to be an effective prototype in terms of quality, efficiency, and user satisfaction. These findings suggest that AI can function as a collaborative partner rather than a replacement, enabling clinicians to focus on higher-level clinical reasoning. With further development in workflow integration, this approach holds significant potential to reduce veterinarian burnout and improve the standardization of clinical care.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 서 론
      • 1. 연구 배경 및 필요성
      • 2. 연구 목적 및 연구 문제
      • 3. 연구의 범위 및 한계
      • II. 이론적 배경
      • I. 서 론
      • 1. 연구 배경 및 필요성
      • 2. 연구 목적 및 연구 문제
      • 3. 연구의 범위 및 한계
      • II. 이론적 배경
      • 1. 수의 임상 진료 프로세스와 SOAP 모형
      • 2. LLM 기반 의사결정 지원 기술 개요
      • 3. RAG 기반 의료 정보 검색 및 생성 기술
      • 4. 임상 의사결정 지원 시스템 연구 동향
      • 5. 사용성 및 인지적 부담 관련 선행연구
      • 6. 관련 연구의 한계점 및 본 연구의 차별성
      • III. 연구 방법
      • 1. 기존 임상 진료 프로세스 변화
      • 2. 연구 설계 개요
      • 3. 효과성 평가 방법
      • 4. 자료 수집 및 분석 방법
      • IV. 시스템 설계 및 구현
      • 1. 시스템 개발 방법론
      • 2. 시스템 아키텍처
      • 3. 핵심 모듈 설계 및 구현
      • V. 효과성 평가 결과
      • 1. 진료 프로세스 내 AI 기술 적용 가능 단계 탐색 결과
      • 2. 진료 효율성 변화 분석
      • 3. 진료 기록 품질 변화 분석
      • 4. 사용성 평가 결과
      • 5. 인지적 부담 변화 분석
      • VI. 결론 및 논의
      • 1. 연구 결과 요약 및 해석
      • 2. 연구의 의의 및 시사점
      • 3. 연구 한계 및 향후 과제
      • 참고문헌
      • ABSTRACT
      • 부록
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼