RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      경영 의사결정 지원을 위한 프로세스 마이닝에서의 근본 원인 분석 = Root Cause Analysis in Process Mining for Managerial Decision Support

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17367940

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      With the widespread adoption of integrated enterprise information systems and the digitalization of business activities, process mining—analyzing organizational processes from event logs—has attracted increasing attention across industries. Conventional process mining, however, largely relies on frequency and pattern analyses, which are effective for revealing process flows and where anomalies occur but less effective at explaining why they occur. In management, identifying factors that causally drive outcomes is essential for deciding what to change and how to achieve performance improvement. Despite this need, systematic, context-aware root cause analysis in process mining remains limited. Prior causal approaches often search for causes using user-defined hypothesis templates, which can narrow the candidate space and weaken interpretability under time constraints and limited contextual information. As a result, important true causes may be missed, or spurious causes may be reported when context is ignored. To address these limitations, we propose a comprehensive root cause analysis methodology for process mining. We introduce three criteria for candidate cause identification—precedence, causal eligibility, and probability raising—and propose AR-ACE (Association Rule–Automatic Candidate Extraction), an association-rule-based method that automatically extracts candidate causes from event logs. We then apply causal tests to the extracted candidates to verify whether they constitute causal antecedents of the outcome. Comparative experiments with prior studies show that the proposed method identifies context-aware causes that existing approaches fail to detect. By automatically deriving evidence-based candidates from event logs, the proposed methodology reduces dependence on user subjectivity and provides actionable causal insights to support decision making for problem solving and process improvement.
      번역하기

      With the widespread adoption of integrated enterprise information systems and the digitalization of business activities, process mining—analyzing organizational processes from event logs—has attracted increasing attention across industries. Conven...

      With the widespread adoption of integrated enterprise information systems and the digitalization of business activities, process mining—analyzing organizational processes from event logs—has attracted increasing attention across industries. Conventional process mining, however, largely relies on frequency and pattern analyses, which are effective for revealing process flows and where anomalies occur but less effective at explaining why they occur. In management, identifying factors that causally drive outcomes is essential for deciding what to change and how to achieve performance improvement. Despite this need, systematic, context-aware root cause analysis in process mining remains limited. Prior causal approaches often search for causes using user-defined hypothesis templates, which can narrow the candidate space and weaken interpretability under time constraints and limited contextual information. As a result, important true causes may be missed, or spurious causes may be reported when context is ignored. To address these limitations, we propose a comprehensive root cause analysis methodology for process mining. We introduce three criteria for candidate cause identification—precedence, causal eligibility, and probability raising—and propose AR-ACE (Association Rule–Automatic Candidate Extraction), an association-rule-based method that automatically extracts candidate causes from event logs. We then apply causal tests to the extracted candidates to verify whether they constitute causal antecedents of the outcome. Comparative experiments with prior studies show that the proposed method identifies context-aware causes that existing approaches fail to detect. By automatically deriving evidence-based candidates from event logs, the proposed methodology reduces dependence on user subjectivity and provides actionable causal insights to support decision making for problem solving and process improvement.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 서론 ·················································· 1
      • 1. 연구 배경 및 목적 ··················································· 1
      • 2. 논문 구성 ····························································· 6
      • II. 배경 연구 ············································ 7
      • I. 서론 ·················································· 1
      • 1. 연구 배경 및 목적 ··················································· 1
      • 2. 논문 구성 ····························································· 6
      • II. 배경 연구 ············································ 7
      • 1. 프로세스 마이닝 ····················································· 7
      • 1) 프로세스 마이닝 기법의 기본 개념 ···································· 7
      • 2) 프로세스 마이닝 기법의 세 가지 기본 유형 ·························· 8
      • 3) 프로세스 마이닝의 주요 구성 요소 ··································· 11
      • 4) 프로세스 마이닝의 도출 알고리즘 ····································· 12
      • (1) 알파 마이닝 ···························································· 12
      • (2) 휴리스틱 마이닝 ······················································ 14
      • (3) 퍼지 마이닝 ···························································· 17
      • (4) 유전자 알고리즘 마이닝 ·············································· 19
      • 2. 프로세스 마이닝에서의 원인 분석 ······························· 21
      • Ⅲ. 선행 연구 ··········································· 24
      • 1. 프로세스 마이닝의 연구 현황 ···································· 24
      • 2. 프로세스 마이닝에서의 원인 분석 연구 현황 ················ 26
      • 3. 인과 기반 원인 분석 ··············································· 28
      • 4. 기존 연구와의 차이점 ·············································· 29
      • Ⅳ. 방법론 ·············································· 31
      • 1. 프로세스 도출 및 분석 ············································ 35
      • 2. 원인 후보군 도출 ··················································· 36
      • 3. 인과성 검정 및 원인 제시 ········································ 44
      • 1) 인과 강도 계산 ··························································· 44
      • 2) 인과성 검정 ······························································· 47
      • Ⅴ. 제안된 모델 검증 ·································· 49
      • 1. 프로세스 도출 및 분석 ············································ 49
      • 1) 이벤트 로그 수집 ······················································· 49
      • 2) 전처리 ····································································· 51
      • 3) 프로세스 도출 및 흐름 분석 ··········································· 52
      • 2. 원인 후보군 도출 ··················································· 56
      • 3. 인과성 검정 및 원인 제시 ········································ 60
      • 1) 인과 강도 계산 ··························································· 60
      • 2) 인과성 검정 ······························································· 61
      • 3) 유사 연구와의 비교 ······················································ 63
      • Ⅵ. 요약 및 결론 ······································· 70
      • 1. 연구 요약 및 시사점 ·············································· 70
      • 2. 연구의 한계점 및 향후 연구 ······································ 71
      • 참고문헌 ················································ 73
      • Abstract ················································ 79
      • 부록 ····················································· 81
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼