RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      가중 K-shell을 활용한 특징 적응형 그래프 어텐션 기반 추천 시스템 = Data-Efficient Graph Attention Network for Recommendation with Weighted K-Shell Features

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17367932

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      사용자-아이템 상호작용 그래프 기반 추천 시스템은 희소성, 노이즈가 포함된 관계, 그리고 심층 메시지 패싱에서 발생하는 과잉 평활화 문제를 겪는다. 본 논문은 무거운 메타데이터에 의존하지 않으면서 데이터 효율성과 강건성을 향상시키는 2단계 프레임워크를 제안한다.

      Method-I에서는 평점 강도, 시간적 최신성, 시청 연도 엔트로피, 시간적 모멘텀을 엣지 가중치로 변환하는 특징 인식 가중 k-shell 기법을 도입하고, 수정된 k-shell 프로세스를 통해 노드 중요도를 도출한다. 이 점수를 활용하여 고코어 노드는 제거하고 저코어 노드는 보강하는 개인화된 엣지 교란 뷰를 구축하며, 대조 학습을 통해 그래프 인코더를 훈련하여 강건하고 메타데이터 의존도가 낮은 사용자/아이템 표현을 획득한다.

      Method-II에서는 특징 적응형 다중 헤드 그래프 어텐션 네트워크인 FAGAT를 제시한다. 동일한 헤드를 사용하는 대신, FAGAT는 RatingEncoding, PopEncoding(차수/통계), TimeEncoding이라는 세 가지 특징 기반 헤드를 사용하며, 각 헤드는 어텐션 집계 전에 LayerNorm과 학습 가능한 게이팅 스칼라로 안정화된다. 최종 사용자/아이템 임베딩은 BPR 손실을 통해 랭킹에 최적화된다.

      MovieLens-100K, MovieLens-1M, 그리고 극도로 희소한 Amazon Digital Music 데이터셋에서 수행한 실험 결과, 7가지 랭킹 지표(Recall@K, Precision@K, F1@K, MRR@K, MAP@K, HR@K, NDCG@K)와 다양한 K 값에서 일관된 성능 향상을 보였다. 특히 제안 모델은 강력한 GNN 베이스라인(GCN, GIN, GAT, GraphSAGE, AGNN)에 비해 명확한 개선을 보였으며, 희소한 음악 데이터에서는 기본 BPR 대비 특히 큰 상대적 성능 향상을 달성하여 희소성 환경에서의 강건성을 입증하였다. 반면, 최신 SSL 기반 모델에 비해서는 다소 낮은 성능을 보여, 극도로 희소한 데이터셋에서 순수 지도 학습의 한계를 드러냈다.
      번역하기

      사용자-아이템 상호작용 그래프 기반 추천 시스템은 희소성, 노이즈가 포함된 관계, 그리고 심층 메시지 패싱에서 발생하는 과잉 평활화 문제를 겪는다. 본 논문은 무거운 메타데이터에 의...

      사용자-아이템 상호작용 그래프 기반 추천 시스템은 희소성, 노이즈가 포함된 관계, 그리고 심층 메시지 패싱에서 발생하는 과잉 평활화 문제를 겪는다. 본 논문은 무거운 메타데이터에 의존하지 않으면서 데이터 효율성과 강건성을 향상시키는 2단계 프레임워크를 제안한다.

      Method-I에서는 평점 강도, 시간적 최신성, 시청 연도 엔트로피, 시간적 모멘텀을 엣지 가중치로 변환하는 특징 인식 가중 k-shell 기법을 도입하고, 수정된 k-shell 프로세스를 통해 노드 중요도를 도출한다. 이 점수를 활용하여 고코어 노드는 제거하고 저코어 노드는 보강하는 개인화된 엣지 교란 뷰를 구축하며, 대조 학습을 통해 그래프 인코더를 훈련하여 강건하고 메타데이터 의존도가 낮은 사용자/아이템 표현을 획득한다.

      Method-II에서는 특징 적응형 다중 헤드 그래프 어텐션 네트워크인 FAGAT를 제시한다. 동일한 헤드를 사용하는 대신, FAGAT는 RatingEncoding, PopEncoding(차수/통계), TimeEncoding이라는 세 가지 특징 기반 헤드를 사용하며, 각 헤드는 어텐션 집계 전에 LayerNorm과 학습 가능한 게이팅 스칼라로 안정화된다. 최종 사용자/아이템 임베딩은 BPR 손실을 통해 랭킹에 최적화된다.

      MovieLens-100K, MovieLens-1M, 그리고 극도로 희소한 Amazon Digital Music 데이터셋에서 수행한 실험 결과, 7가지 랭킹 지표(Recall@K, Precision@K, F1@K, MRR@K, MAP@K, HR@K, NDCG@K)와 다양한 K 값에서 일관된 성능 향상을 보였다. 특히 제안 모델은 강력한 GNN 베이스라인(GCN, GIN, GAT, GraphSAGE, AGNN)에 비해 명확한 개선을 보였으며, 희소한 음악 데이터에서는 기본 BPR 대비 특히 큰 상대적 성능 향상을 달성하여 희소성 환경에서의 강건성을 입증하였다. 반면, 최신 SSL 기반 모델에 비해서는 다소 낮은 성능을 보여, 극도로 희소한 데이터셋에서 순수 지도 학습의 한계를 드러냈다.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 서론························································································································· 1
      • II. 관련연구················································································································ 5
      • 1. Mixture of Experts 기반 그래프 추천 시스템·········································6
      • 2. Multi_view Learning 기반 그래프 추천 시스템······································7
      • 3. 그래프 신경망 관련 연구 ·············································································8
      • I. 서론························································································································· 1
      • II. 관련연구················································································································ 5
      • 1. Mixture of Experts 기반 그래프 추천 시스템·········································6
      • 2. Multi_view Learning 기반 그래프 추천 시스템······································7
      • 3. 그래프 신경망 관련 연구 ·············································································8
      • III. 제안하는 연구···································································································13
      • 1. 전체 시스템 구조도·······················································································13
      • 2. 데이터 수집 및 전처리 ···············································································15
      • 3. Feature-aware K-shell based representation Learning ······················18
      • 3-1. K-shell 알고리즘의 데이터기반 엣지 변형···································18
      • 3-2. 특징 가중치기반의 Weighted Kshell··············································23
      • 3-3. K-core 기반 그래프 데이터 증강기 설계·····································24
      • 3-4. 그래프 증강기 학습 및 결과 시각화··············································29
      • 4. Feature-adaptive Graph Attention Network ········································30
      • 4-1. GAT에서의 Multi-head 연산 ·························································30
      • 4-2. 데이터 효율적인 FAGAT 모델의 헤드 설계·······························33
      • 4-3. 안정적인 특징 주입방법 및 헤드 설계 ········································37
      • 4-4. 전체 학습 파이프라인 ······································································39
      • IV. 성능 평가 ········································································································44
      • 1. BaseLine 모델 선정······················································································44
      • 2. 학습 환경 및 하이퍼파라미터 설정 ·························································47
      • 3. 추천 시스템에서의 성능 평가 방법 및 지표···········································49
      • 4. 성능 비교 ·······································································································53
      • V. 결론······················································································································ 59
      • 부록···························································································································· 61
      • 참고 문헌·················································································································· 66
      • ABSTRACT············································································································ 71
      • 감사의 글·················································································································· 74
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼