RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    불교와 분석심리학의 비교 : 번뇌와 그림자를 중심으로

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17367224

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This thesis compares the Buddhist concept of kilesa (defilements) in early Buddhism with the concept of the shadow in Jungian analytical psychology, with the aim of providing an integrated understanding of the origins of human suffering and the process of healing. The researcher notes that Buddhist kilesa refers to the totality of mental impurities that disturb the mind and produce suffering, explaining that these defilements arise primarily from the Three Poisons—greed, anger, and ignorance—and are formed conditionally through the principle of dependent origination. Furthermore, the thesis states that defilements gradually diminish through the practice of the Four Noble Truths and the Noble Eightfold Path, and that they undergo a transformative healing process through the cultivation of wisdom and compassion.
    In contrast, the shadow in Jungian psychology refers to the psychological domain of negative or rejected aspects of the self that have been repressed into the unconscious, operating within both the personal unconscious and the broader framework of the collective unconscious. Jung argued that, rather than eliminating the shadow, individuals must recognize and integrate it in order to restore psychological wholeness, or the Self. The shadow not only contains repressed emotions, desires, and impulses but also serves as a pathway to the true self concealed behind the social persona.
    The thesis identifies a shared focus on “negative psychological content” in both Buddhist kilesa and Jung’s shadow, yet highlights a critical distinction: Buddhism regards defilements as something to be ultimately eliminated, whereas Jung views the shadow as something to be integrated. Buddhism explains that defilements arise from misperception rooted in ignorance, while Jung sees repression and the split between consciousness and the unconscious as the source of shadow-related psychological problems.
    In addition, the thesis suggests a correspondence between the Buddhist path of practice—mindfulness, concentration, and wisdom—and the Jungian therapeutic process of recognition, exploration, and integration. Both traditions emphasize self-observation and insight as essential means of addressing mental suffering and facilitating inner transformation. In Buddhist counseling, defilements are understood as the roots of cognitive distortions and negative emotional patterns, and practices such as mindfulness, compassion meditation, and insight meditation are proposed as therapeutic interventions. Likewise, Jungian psychology emphasizes that confronting and integrating the shadow expands the ego into a larger Self, a developmental process that parallels aspects of the Buddhist insight into non-self.
    Finally, the researcher concludes that comparing defilements and the shadow offers a valuable integrated framework for modern counseling, providing a theoretical basis for combining Buddhist meditative methods with depth-psychological approaches. This integrative view is presented as a meaningful contribution to the practical development of Buddhist counseling.
    번역하기

    This thesis compares the Buddhist concept of kilesa (defilements) in early Buddhism with the concept of the shadow in Jungian analytical psychology, with the aim of providing an integrated understanding of the origins of human suffering and the proces...

    This thesis compares the Buddhist concept of kilesa (defilements) in early Buddhism with the concept of the shadow in Jungian analytical psychology, with the aim of providing an integrated understanding of the origins of human suffering and the process of healing. The researcher notes that Buddhist kilesa refers to the totality of mental impurities that disturb the mind and produce suffering, explaining that these defilements arise primarily from the Three Poisons—greed, anger, and ignorance—and are formed conditionally through the principle of dependent origination. Furthermore, the thesis states that defilements gradually diminish through the practice of the Four Noble Truths and the Noble Eightfold Path, and that they undergo a transformative healing process through the cultivation of wisdom and compassion.
    In contrast, the shadow in Jungian psychology refers to the psychological domain of negative or rejected aspects of the self that have been repressed into the unconscious, operating within both the personal unconscious and the broader framework of the collective unconscious. Jung argued that, rather than eliminating the shadow, individuals must recognize and integrate it in order to restore psychological wholeness, or the Self. The shadow not only contains repressed emotions, desires, and impulses but also serves as a pathway to the true self concealed behind the social persona.
    The thesis identifies a shared focus on “negative psychological content” in both Buddhist kilesa and Jung’s shadow, yet highlights a critical distinction: Buddhism regards defilements as something to be ultimately eliminated, whereas Jung views the shadow as something to be integrated. Buddhism explains that defilements arise from misperception rooted in ignorance, while Jung sees repression and the split between consciousness and the unconscious as the source of shadow-related psychological problems.
    In addition, the thesis suggests a correspondence between the Buddhist path of practice—mindfulness, concentration, and wisdom—and the Jungian therapeutic process of recognition, exploration, and integration. Both traditions emphasize self-observation and insight as essential means of addressing mental suffering and facilitating inner transformation. In Buddhist counseling, defilements are understood as the roots of cognitive distortions and negative emotional patterns, and practices such as mindfulness, compassion meditation, and insight meditation are proposed as therapeutic interventions. Likewise, Jungian psychology emphasizes that confronting and integrating the shadow expands the ego into a larger Self, a developmental process that parallels aspects of the Buddhist insight into non-self.
    Finally, the researcher concludes that comparing defilements and the shadow offers a valuable integrated framework for modern counseling, providing a theoretical basis for combining Buddhist meditative methods with depth-psychological approaches. This integrative view is presented as a meaningful contribution to the practical development of Buddhist counseling.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 제1장 서 론 1
    • 제1절 연구의 목적 1
    • 제2절 연구의 범위 및 방법 4
    • 1. 연구의 범위 4
    • 2. 연구의 방법 5
    • 제1장 서 론 1
    • 제1절 연구의 목적 1
    • 제2절 연구의 범위 및 방법 4
    • 1. 연구의 범위 4
    • 2. 연구의 방법 5
    • 제2장 불교의 번뇌(煩惱) ...................................................................................6
    • 제1절 번뇌 개념과 범위 6
    • 제2절 근본 번뇌 8
    • 제3절 번뇌의 발생 구조 11
    • 제4절 번뇌의 소멸과 수행 13
    • 제5절 번뇌의 정화와 마음치유....................................................................16
    • 제6절 현대 불교 상담에서 번뇌의 이해 .................................................19
    • 제3장 분석심리학의 그림자(Shadow) 22
    • 제1절 융의 인간관 22
    • 제2절 융의 분석심리학 체계와 무의식의 구조.....................................25
    • 제3절 그림자의 개념......................................................................................28
    • 제4절 그림자의 통합과 자기실현(Self-realization) 과정.....................32
    • 제5절 현대 심리치료에서의 그림자 개념의 적용 ................................35
    • 제4장 번뇌와 그림자의 비교 분석.................................................................37
    • 제1절 번뇌와 그림자의 개념적 구조 비교 37
    • 1. 번뇌의 심리적 구조 37
    • 2. 그림자의 심리적 구조 38
    • 3. 번뇌의 발생과 그림자의 형성............................................................42
    • 4. 융의 무의식 구조와 그림자 생성 ....................................................45
    • 5. 무명과 억압의 관계 .............................................................................47
    • 제2절 번뇌의 소멸과 그림자의 통합: 수행과 자기실현의 길 50
    • 1. 사성제와 팔정도의 수행 단계 ........................................................50
    • 2. 그림자 통합의 심리학적 과정 ........................................................53
    • 3. 깨달음(Nibbāna)과 자기실현(Self-realization)의 비교..............57
    • 제3절 수행과 분석의 과정: 마음치유의 단계별 비교 .........................62
    • 1. 사띠(Sati)와 그림자 인식....................................................................62
    • 2. 선정(Samadhi)과 무의식 탐색 .........................................................65
    • 3. 통찰(Vipassana)과 자아 그림자 통합 ............................................67
    • 4. 상담 명상에서의 적용 가능성 ..........................................................71
    • 제4절 통합적 관점에서 본 번뇌와 그림자의 치유적 함의 ................73
    • 1. 고통의 자각에서 치유로 불교와 융의 공통 통찰 .......................73
    • 2. 무아(Anatta)와 자기(Self)의 통합적 해석 ....................................74
    • 3. 불교 상담학과 분석심리학의 융합 가능성 ....................................76
    • 제5장 결론 79
    • 1. 비교 결과의 종합적 고찰 .....................................................................82
    • 2. 불교 상담학적 함의 ...............................................................................84
    • 3. 연구의 한계와 후속 연구 제언 ..........................................................85
    • 참 고 문 헌 88
    • ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................95
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼