RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    강한상관이 존재하는 보조정보를 이용한 회귀 추정

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17367050

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Regression estimation can be improved survey precision by incorporating auxiliary information, but highly correlated auxiliary variables often cause multicollinearity and unstable coefficient estimation. This study studies regression estimation using highly correlated auxiliary variables under complex survey designs and proposes weighted principal component regression (WPCR) and weighted ridge regression (WRR) as alternatives to the generalized regression estimator (GREG). Monte Carlo simulations across varying correlation structures evaluate bias, standard deviation, RMSE, and absolute relative bias (ARB). The results show that WPCR and especially WRR provide more stable and accurate estimation than GREG in highly correlated settings.
    번역하기

    Regression estimation can be improved survey precision by incorporating auxiliary information, but highly correlated auxiliary variables often cause multicollinearity and unstable coefficient estimation. This study studies regression estimation using ...

    Regression estimation can be improved survey precision by incorporating auxiliary information, but highly correlated auxiliary variables often cause multicollinearity and unstable coefficient estimation. This study studies regression estimation using highly correlated auxiliary variables under complex survey designs and proposes weighted principal component regression (WPCR) and weighted ridge regression (WRR) as alternatives to the generalized regression estimator (GREG). Monte Carlo simulations across varying correlation structures evaluate bias, standard deviation, RMSE, and absolute relative bias (ARB). The results show that WPCR and especially WRR provide more stable and accurate estimation than GREG in highly correlated settings.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 제1장 서 론 ·········································································································· 1
    • 제2장 이론적 배경 ······························································································ 3
    • 제1절 회귀모형과 회귀계수 추정의 기본 개념 ····································· 3
    • 제2절 다중공선성의 개념과 회귀추정에 미치는 영향 ························· 5
    • 제3장 회귀추정(Regression Estimation) ··················································· 7
    • 제1장 서 론 ·········································································································· 1
    • 제2장 이론적 배경 ······························································································ 3
    • 제1절 회귀모형과 회귀계수 추정의 기본 개념 ····································· 3
    • 제2절 다중공선성의 개념과 회귀추정에 미치는 영향 ························· 5
    • 제3장 회귀추정(Regression Estimation) ··················································· 7
    • 제1절 가중 최소제곱 회귀(WLS) ······························································ 7
    • 제2절 가중 주성분 회귀(WPCR) ····························································· 10
    • 제3절 가중 능형 회귀(WRR) ··································································· 13
    • 제4장 데이터 분석 ··························································································· 16
    • 제1절 자료 소개 및 시뮬레이션 방법 ···················································· 16
    • 제2절 모의실험 ······························································································ 19
    • 제3절 실제 데이터 분석 ············································································· 25
    • 제5장 결 론 ········································································································ 27
    • 참 고 문 헌 ·································································································· 29
    • ABSTRACT ······································································································ 31
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼