The steady rise in global air travel is placing new demands on medium-sized airports. The latter now faces the difficult task of handling more passengers despite having limited space, staff, and equipment. Unlike large international hubs, they often l...
The steady rise in global air travel is placing new demands on medium-sized airports. The latter now faces the difficult task of handling more passengers despite having limited space, staff, and equipment. Unlike large international hubs, they often lack the flexibility and spare capacity needed to handle demand peaks. As a result, bottlenecks frequently appear at check-in, security screening, passport control, and baggage claim. Such delays slow operations and affect passenger comfort and the overall image of the airport. In response, many airports have expanded their terminals and adopted modern systems such as e-gates, self-service kiosks, and automated security lanes. Yet, despite these improvements, there is still little concrete evidence on how much these upgrades have enhanced day-to-day performance. This thesis examined how infrastructure expansion and technological innovation affect passenger flow optimization in medium-sized airports. Using statistical analysis and queueing theory (M/M/s), the study evaluated actual waiting times across multiple checkpoints using longitudinal data from 2019-2024. Tirana International Airport (TIA) was selected as the representative example. It was selected based on the surge in passenger numbers from 3.3 million in 2019 to over 10 million in 2024 and their choice of mitigation measures which were terminal growth and automation. TIA’s case provides a realistic example of how a rapidly developing regional airport manages growth while aiming to sustain service quality under limited resources. This study used statistics and queueing simulations to track waiting-time trends and predict future demand. The collected data were checked with queueing models to make sure the results were consistent. Findings were compared with IATA Level of Service (Los) Code C standards to show what is acceptable. Both descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted, including ANOVA and post-hoc tests, to verify whether the observed improvements were statistically significant across all five processing domains: check-in, security control, passport control (departure and arrival), and baggage claim. Results show that terminal expansion and new technologies helped cut delays, especially at security and passport control. Year-over-year (YoY) changes were clear. The queueing theory analysis revealed reduced utilization rates (ρ) and shorter queue lengths (Lq) in most domains, indicating better operational balance between arrival and service rates. Simulations suggest that when TIA handles more than 13 million passengers a year, service quality may drop unless more capacity is added. This also applies to airports of a similar size. These findings imply that while short-term congestion can be effectively mitigated, long-term sustainability will depend on continuous investment, adaptive scheduling, and data-driven resource management. Overall, the study finds that infrastructure upgrades paired with new technologies can ease congestion and improve flows in medium-sized airports, while stressing the need for careful planning, data-informed choices, and continuous monitoring. Beyond TIA, the methodological framework presented here, combining statistical evaluation, queueing modeling, and international benchmarking, can serve as a practical tool for airport managers seeking to anticipate congestion and design evidence-based capacity plans. The research contributes both academically, by validating the application of M/M/s modeling in airport flow studies, and practically, by offering measurable insights into how terminal development and automation improve passenger experience and operational efficiency.
Keywords: passenger flow management, medium-sized airports, queueing theory, airport capacity optimization, waiting time analysis, terminal expansion, technological innovation, operational efficiency.